Re: [PATCH] IRDA: Avoid a label defined but not used warning in irda_init()
From: Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 23:22:33 +0200 > Hi, > > Easily avoidable compiler warnings bug me. > > > Building irmod without CONFIG_SYSCTL currently results in : > net/irda/irmod.c:132: warning: label 'out_err_2' defined but not used > > But that can easily be avoided by simply moving the label inside > the existing "#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL" one line above it. > > This patch moves the label and buys us one less warning with no > ill effects. > > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, thanks Jesper. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] IRDA: Avoid a label defined but not used warning in irda_init()
From: Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 23:22:33 +0200 Hi, Easily avoidable compiler warnings bug me. Building irmod without CONFIG_SYSCTL currently results in : net/irda/irmod.c:132: warning: label 'out_err_2' defined but not used But that can easily be avoided by simply moving the label inside the existing #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL one line above it. This patch moves the label and buys us one less warning with no ill effects. Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Applied, thanks Jesper. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH] IRDA: Avoid a label defined but not used warning in irda_init()
Hi, Easily avoidable compiler warnings bug me. Building irmod without CONFIG_SYSCTL currently results in : net/irda/irmod.c:132: warning: label 'out_err_2' defined but not used But that can easily be avoided by simply moving the label inside the existing "#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL" one line above it. This patch moves the label and buys us one less warning with no ill effects. Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- net/irda/irmod.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/irda/irmod.c b/net/irda/irmod.c index 1900937..8ba703d 100644 --- a/net/irda/irmod.c +++ b/net/irda/irmod.c @@ -128,8 +128,8 @@ static int __init irda_init(void) out_err_3: #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL irda_sysctl_unregister(); -#endif out_err_2: +#endif #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS irda_proc_unregister(); #endif - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH] IRDA: Avoid a label defined but not used warning in irda_init()
Hi, Easily avoidable compiler warnings bug me. Building irmod without CONFIG_SYSCTL currently results in : net/irda/irmod.c:132: warning: label 'out_err_2' defined but not used But that can easily be avoided by simply moving the label inside the existing #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL one line above it. This patch moves the label and buys us one less warning with no ill effects. Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- net/irda/irmod.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/irda/irmod.c b/net/irda/irmod.c index 1900937..8ba703d 100644 --- a/net/irda/irmod.c +++ b/net/irda/irmod.c @@ -128,8 +128,8 @@ static int __init irda_init(void) out_err_3: #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL irda_sysctl_unregister(); -#endif out_err_2: +#endif #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS irda_proc_unregister(); #endif - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
