Re: [PATCH] MIPS: select CPU_MIPS64 for remaining MIPS64 CPUs
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 2:41 PM Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Feb 2021, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > > The CPU_MIPS64 and CPU_MIPS32 variables are supposed to be able to > > distinguish broadly between 64-bit and 32-bit MIPS CPUs. However, they > > That is not true. The purpose of these options is to identify MIPS64 and > MIPS32 ISA processors respectively (and the generic features these ISAs > imply). There are 64-bit and 32-bit MIPS processors which do not qualify, > specifically all MIPS I, MIPS II, MIPS III, and MIPS IV implementations. > > > weren't selected by the specialty CPUs, Octeon and Loongson, which meant > > it was possible to hit a weird state of: > > > > MIPS=y, CONFIG_64BIT=y, CPU_MIPS64=n > > This is a correct combination for MIPS III and MIPS IV processors. > > > This commit rectifies the issue by having CPU_MIPS64 be selected when > > the missing Octeon or Loongson models are selected. > > From the description and/or other options selected by CPU_LOONGSON64 and > CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON I infer the change itself is correct, so you only need > to rewrite the change description. Indeed you're right. v2 on its way. Jason
Re: [PATCH] MIPS: select CPU_MIPS64 for remaining MIPS64 CPUs
On Sat, 27 Feb 2021, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > The CPU_MIPS64 and CPU_MIPS32 variables are supposed to be able to > distinguish broadly between 64-bit and 32-bit MIPS CPUs. However, they That is not true. The purpose of these options is to identify MIPS64 and MIPS32 ISA processors respectively (and the generic features these ISAs imply). There are 64-bit and 32-bit MIPS processors which do not qualify, specifically all MIPS I, MIPS II, MIPS III, and MIPS IV implementations. > weren't selected by the specialty CPUs, Octeon and Loongson, which meant > it was possible to hit a weird state of: > > MIPS=y, CONFIG_64BIT=y, CPU_MIPS64=n This is a correct combination for MIPS III and MIPS IV processors. > This commit rectifies the issue by having CPU_MIPS64 be selected when > the missing Octeon or Loongson models are selected. From the description and/or other options selected by CPU_LOONGSON64 and CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON I infer the change itself is correct, so you only need to rewrite the change description. Though overall it seems we have quite a mess here, several other CPUs, such as at the very least CPU_XLR and CPU_XLP, do not select this option either, and then we have say CPU_MIPSR2 that is selected by some CPUs while being conditional on other ones. All this stuff asks for being rewritten in a consistent manner. In any case your change may have to be run-time verified though with the respective processors. Maciej
[PATCH] MIPS: select CPU_MIPS64 for remaining MIPS64 CPUs
The CPU_MIPS64 and CPU_MIPS32 variables are supposed to be able to distinguish broadly between 64-bit and 32-bit MIPS CPUs. However, they weren't selected by the specialty CPUs, Octeon and Loongson, which meant it was possible to hit a weird state of: MIPS=y, CONFIG_64BIT=y, CPU_MIPS64=n This commit rectifies the issue by having CPU_MIPS64 be selected when the missing Octeon or Loongson models are selected. Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer Cc: Ralf Baechle Cc: George Cherian Cc: Huacai Chen Cc: Jiaxun Yang Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld --- arch/mips/Kconfig | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/mips/Kconfig b/arch/mips/Kconfig index d89efba3d8a4..3e0e8f1d2e82 100644 --- a/arch/mips/Kconfig +++ b/arch/mips/Kconfig @@ -2118,7 +2118,7 @@ config CPU_MIPS32 config CPU_MIPS64 bool default y if CPU_MIPS64_R1 || CPU_MIPS64_R2 || CPU_MIPS64_R5 || \ -CPU_MIPS64_R6 +CPU_MIPS64_R6 || CPU_LOONGSON64 || CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON # # These indicate the revision of the architecture -- 2.30.1
