Please add a prefix to the patch subject.
> kobject_init_and_add() takes reference even when it fails. I suggest to extend this description another bit. Which object is affected here? > If this function returns an error, kobject_put() must be called to > properly clean up the memory associated with the object. Such a copy from the function description of this programming interface can be helpful. > Thus, when call of kobject_init_and_add() fail, I propose to avoid the repetition of this condition. > we should call kobject_put() instead of kfree(). How do you think about a wording variant like the following? Replace a call of the function “kfree” by “kobject_put” because of using kernel objects in the proper way. > Previous commit "b8eb718348b8" fixed a similar problem. I wonder if such information is really relevant for the commit message. Regards, Markus
