Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

[Viresh Kumar]

On 10-04-17, 08:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Yes, keeping both make most sense, I think.
> 
> Anyway, I found now the original report thread of Masahiro and I see
> Mark's response about using '-'. In that case I am fine with this. I
> would prefer to take only the exynos part (separated to ARMv7 and
> ARMv8) through my tree but I already sent a pull request so I am fine
> with this going directly to arm-soc.

This may end up going via the PM tree.

> I think you need to update also:
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.txt

Oops. I searched for opp@ and missed the complex ones. There are some
DT files as well for TI which I missed. Will send a V2 with all that
fixed.

> With that change:
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
> (and implied acked-by)

Thanks.

-- 
viresh

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

[Viresh Kumar]

On 10-04-17, 08:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Yes, keeping both make most sense, I think.
> 
> Anyway, I found now the original report thread of Masahiro and I see
> Mark's response about using '-'. In that case I am fine with this. I
> would prefer to take only the exynos part (separated to ARMv7 and
> ARMv8) through my tree but I already sent a pull request so I am fine
> with this going directly to arm-soc.

This may end up going via the PM tree.

> I think you need to update also:
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.txt

Oops. I searched for opp@ and missed the complex ones. There are some
DT files as well for TI which I missed. Will send a V2 with all that
fixed.

> With that change:
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
> (and implied acked-by)

Thanks.

-- 
viresh

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Viresh Kumar  wrote:
> On 10-04-17, 15:30, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> 2017-04-10 15:22 GMT+09:00 Viresh Kumar :
>> > On 10-04-17, 10:46, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> >> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:
>> >>
>> >> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a
>> >> unit name, but no reg property
>> >>
>> >> Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
>> >> "reg" property.
>> >>
>> >> Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada 
>> >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
>> >
>> > + Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
>> >
>> > --
>> > viresh
>>
>>
>> Given that this had already been reported one year before,
>> the reported-by credit should be given to Krzysztof.
>>
>> Please drop my Reported-by.
>
> I don't think we need to drop any of you. We can very well keep both
> :)

Yes, keeping both make most sense, I think.

Anyway, I found now the original report thread of Masahiro and I see
Mark's response about using '-'. In that case I am fine with this. I
would prefer to take only the exynos part (separated to ARMv7 and
ARMv8) through my tree but I already sent a pull request so I am fine
with this going directly to arm-soc.

I think you need to update also:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.txt
With that change:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
(and implied acked-by)

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Viresh Kumar  wrote:
> On 10-04-17, 15:30, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> 2017-04-10 15:22 GMT+09:00 Viresh Kumar :
>> > On 10-04-17, 10:46, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> >> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:
>> >>
>> >> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a
>> >> unit name, but no reg property
>> >>
>> >> Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
>> >> "reg" property.
>> >>
>> >> Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada 
>> >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
>> >
>> > + Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
>> >
>> > --
>> > viresh
>>
>>
>> Given that this had already been reported one year before,
>> the reported-by credit should be given to Krzysztof.
>>
>> Please drop my Reported-by.
>
> I don't think we need to drop any of you. We can very well keep both
> :)

Yes, keeping both make most sense, I think.

Anyway, I found now the original report thread of Masahiro and I see
Mark's response about using '-'. In that case I am fine with this. I
would prefer to take only the exynos part (separated to ARMv7 and
ARMv8) through my tree but I already sent a pull request so I am fine
with this going directly to arm-soc.

I think you need to update also:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.txt
With that change:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
(and implied acked-by)

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

[Chanwoo Choi]

Hi,

On 2017년 04월 10일 14:16, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:
> 
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a
> unit name, but no reg property
> 
> Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
> "reg" property.
> 
> Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt | 46 +++
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt  | 38 ++---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi  | 46 +++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi  | 32 +--
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-prime.dtsi|  4 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi  | 66 
> +++---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi  | 40 ++---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi  | 56 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa25x.dtsi  |  8 +--
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi  | 14 ++---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi   |  8 +--
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/uniphier-pro5.dtsi   | 32 +--
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/uniphier-pxs2.dtsi   | 16 +++---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-bus.dtsi | 48 
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi | 50 
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld11.dtsi   | 14 ++---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20.dtsi   | 32 +--
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/zte/zx296718.dtsi  | 10 ++--
>  18 files changed, 280 insertions(+), 280 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi 

[snip]

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

[Chanwoo Choi]

Hi,

On 2017년 04월 10일 14:16, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:
> 
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a
> unit name, but no reg property
> 
> Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
> "reg" property.
> 
> Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt | 46 +++
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt  | 38 ++---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi  | 46 +++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi  | 32 +--
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-prime.dtsi|  4 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi  | 66 
> +++---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi  | 40 ++---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi  | 56 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa25x.dtsi  |  8 +--
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi  | 14 ++---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi   |  8 +--
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/uniphier-pro5.dtsi   | 32 +--
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/uniphier-pxs2.dtsi   | 16 +++---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-bus.dtsi | 48 
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi | 50 
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld11.dtsi   | 14 ++---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20.dtsi   | 32 +--
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/zte/zx296718.dtsi  | 10 ++--
>  18 files changed, 280 insertions(+), 280 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi 

[snip]

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

[Viresh Kumar]

On 10-04-17, 15:30, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2017-04-10 15:22 GMT+09:00 Viresh Kumar :
> > On 10-04-17, 10:46, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:
> >>
> >> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a
> >> unit name, but no reg property
> >>
> >> Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
> >> "reg" property.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada 
> >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
> >
> > + Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
> >
> > --
> > viresh
> 
> 
> Given that this had already been reported one year before,
> the reported-by credit should be given to Krzysztof.
> 
> Please drop my Reported-by.

I don't think we need to drop any of you. We can very well keep both
:)

-- 
viresh

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

[Viresh Kumar]

On 10-04-17, 15:30, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2017-04-10 15:22 GMT+09:00 Viresh Kumar :
> > On 10-04-17, 10:46, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:
> >>
> >> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a
> >> unit name, but no reg property
> >>
> >> Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
> >> "reg" property.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada 
> >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
> >
> > + Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
> >
> > --
> > viresh
> 
> 
> Given that this had already been reported one year before,
> the reported-by credit should be given to Krzysztof.
> 
> Please drop my Reported-by.

I don't think we need to drop any of you. We can very well keep both
:)

-- 
viresh

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

[Masahiro Yamada]

2017-04-10 15:22 GMT+09:00 Viresh Kumar :
> On 10-04-17, 10:46, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:
>>
>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a
>> unit name, but no reg property
>>
>> Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
>> "reg" property.
>>
>> Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada 
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
>
> + Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
>
> --
> viresh


Given that this had already been reported one year before,
the reported-by credit should be given to Krzysztof.

Please drop my Reported-by.


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

[Masahiro Yamada]

2017-04-10 15:22 GMT+09:00 Viresh Kumar :
> On 10-04-17, 10:46, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:
>>
>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a
>> unit name, but no reg property
>>
>> Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
>> "reg" property.
>>
>> Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada 
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
>
> + Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
>
> --
> viresh


Given that this had already been reported one year before,
the reported-by credit should be given to Krzysztof.

Please drop my Reported-by.


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

[Viresh Kumar]

On 10-04-17, 10:46, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:
> 
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a
> unit name, but no reg property
> 
> Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
> "reg" property.
> 
> Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 

+ Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 

-- 
viresh

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

[Viresh Kumar]

On 10-04-17, 10:46, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:
> 
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a
> unit name, but no reg property
> 
> Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
> "reg" property.
> 
> Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 

+ Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 

-- 
viresh

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Viresh Kumar  wrote:
> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:
>
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a
> unit name, but no reg property
>
> Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
> "reg" property.
>
> Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 

This is an very old issue:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg120914.html
(reported year ago, please update the Reported-by)
and guide was to either use oppN format or whitelist opp nodes in dtc.
Apparently the second never happened...

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Viresh Kumar  wrote:
> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:
>
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a
> unit name, but no reg property
>
> Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
> "reg" property.
>
> Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 

This is an very old issue:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg120914.html
(reported year ago, please update the Reported-by)
and guide was to either use oppN format or whitelist opp nodes in dtc.
Apparently the second never happened...

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

[Maxime Ripard]

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:46:37AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:
> 
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a
> unit name, but no reg property
> 
> Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
> "reg" property.
> 
> Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt | 46 +++
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt  | 38 ++---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi  | 46 +++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi  | 32 +--
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-prime.dtsi|  4 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi  | 66 
> +++---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi  | 40 ++---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi  | 56 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa25x.dtsi  |  8 +--
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi  | 14 ++---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi   |  8 +--

For sunxi,
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard 

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

[Maxime Ripard]

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:46:37AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:
> 
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a
> unit name, but no reg property
> 
> Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
> "reg" property.
> 
> Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt | 46 +++
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt  | 38 ++---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi  | 46 +++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi  | 32 +--
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-prime.dtsi|  4 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi  | 66 
> +++---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi  | 40 ++---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi  | 56 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa25x.dtsi  |  8 +--
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi  | 14 ++---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi   |  8 +--

For sunxi,
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard 

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

[PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

[Viresh Kumar]

Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:

Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a
unit name, but no reg property

Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
"reg" property.

Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada 
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt | 46 +++
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt  | 38 ++---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi  | 46 +++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi  | 32 +--
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-prime.dtsi|  4 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi  | 66 +++---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi  | 40 ++---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi  | 56 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa25x.dtsi  |  8 +--
 arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi  | 14 ++---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi   |  8 +--
 arch/arm/boot/dts/uniphier-pro5.dtsi   | 32 +--
 arch/arm/boot/dts/uniphier-pxs2.dtsi   | 16 +++---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-bus.dtsi | 48 
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi | 50 
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld11.dtsi   | 14 ++---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20.dtsi   | 32 +--
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/zte/zx296718.dtsi  | 10 ++--
 18 files changed, 280 insertions(+), 280 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt 
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt
index d085ef90d27c..f8e946471a58 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt
@@ -202,23 +202,23 @@ is able to support the bus frequency for all Exynos SoCs.
compatible = "operating-points-v2";
opp-shared;
 
-   opp@5000 {
+   opp-5000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <5000>;
opp-microvolt = <80>;
};
-   opp@1 {
+   opp-1 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1>;
opp-microvolt = <80>;
};
-   opp@13400 {
+   opp-13400 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <13400>;
opp-microvolt = <80>;
};
-   opp@2 {
+   opp-2 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <2>;
opp-microvolt = <825000>;
};
-   opp@4 {
+   opp-4 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <4>;
opp-microvolt = <875000>;
};
@@ -292,23 +292,23 @@ is able to support the bus frequency for all Exynos SoCs.
compatible = "operating-points-v2";
opp-shared;
 
-   opp@5000 {
+   opp-5000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <5000>;
opp-microvolt = <90>;
};
-   opp@8000 {
+   opp-8000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <8000>;
opp-microvolt = <90>;
};
-   opp@1 {
+   opp-1 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1>;
opp-microvolt = <100>;
};
-   opp@13400 {
+   opp-13400 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <13400>;
opp-microvolt = <100>;
};
-   opp@2 {
+   opp-2 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <2>;
opp-microvolt = <100>;
};
@@ -318,19 +318,19 @@ is able to support the bus frequency for all Exynos SoCs.
compatible = "operating-points-v2";
opp-shared;
 
-   opp@5000 {
+   opp-5000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <5000>;
};
-   opp@8000 {
+   opp-8000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <8000>;
};
-   opp@1 {
+   opp-1 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1>;
};
-   opp@2 {
+   opp-2 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <2>;
};
-   opp@4 {
+   opp-4 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <4>;
  

[PATCH] PM / OPP: Use - instead of @ for DT entries

[Viresh Kumar]

Compiling the DT file with W=1, DTC warns like follows:

Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@10 has a
unit name, but no reg property

Fix this by replacing '@' with '-' as the OPP nodes will never have a
"reg" property.

Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada 
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar 
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt | 46 +++
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt  | 38 ++---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi  | 46 +++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi  | 32 +--
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-prime.dtsi|  4 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi  | 66 +++---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi  | 40 ++---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi  | 56 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa25x.dtsi  |  8 +--
 arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi  | 14 ++---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a33.dtsi   |  8 +--
 arch/arm/boot/dts/uniphier-pro5.dtsi   | 32 +--
 arch/arm/boot/dts/uniphier-pxs2.dtsi   | 16 +++---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-bus.dtsi | 48 
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi | 50 
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld11.dtsi   | 14 ++---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20.dtsi   | 32 +--
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/zte/zx296718.dtsi  | 10 ++--
 18 files changed, 280 insertions(+), 280 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt 
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt
index d085ef90d27c..f8e946471a58 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt
@@ -202,23 +202,23 @@ is able to support the bus frequency for all Exynos SoCs.
compatible = "operating-points-v2";
opp-shared;
 
-   opp@5000 {
+   opp-5000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <5000>;
opp-microvolt = <80>;
};
-   opp@1 {
+   opp-1 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1>;
opp-microvolt = <80>;
};
-   opp@13400 {
+   opp-13400 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <13400>;
opp-microvolt = <80>;
};
-   opp@2 {
+   opp-2 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <2>;
opp-microvolt = <825000>;
};
-   opp@4 {
+   opp-4 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <4>;
opp-microvolt = <875000>;
};
@@ -292,23 +292,23 @@ is able to support the bus frequency for all Exynos SoCs.
compatible = "operating-points-v2";
opp-shared;
 
-   opp@5000 {
+   opp-5000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <5000>;
opp-microvolt = <90>;
};
-   opp@8000 {
+   opp-8000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <8000>;
opp-microvolt = <90>;
};
-   opp@1 {
+   opp-1 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1>;
opp-microvolt = <100>;
};
-   opp@13400 {
+   opp-13400 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <13400>;
opp-microvolt = <100>;
};
-   opp@2 {
+   opp-2 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <2>;
opp-microvolt = <100>;
};
@@ -318,19 +318,19 @@ is able to support the bus frequency for all Exynos SoCs.
compatible = "operating-points-v2";
opp-shared;
 
-   opp@5000 {
+   opp-5000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <5000>;
};
-   opp@8000 {
+   opp-8000 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <8000>;
};
-   opp@1 {
+   opp-1 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1>;
};
-   opp@2 {
+   opp-2 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <2>;
};
-   opp@4 {
+   opp-4 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <4>;
};
};
@@ -339,19 +339,19 @@ is able to