Re: [PATCH] SPARC: backoff.h: delete a duplicated word

[Randy Dunlap]

On 7/21/20 6:22 PM, David Miller wrote:

>> @David:
>> In arch/sparc/include/asm/cpu_type.h, line 12,
>> is that duplicated "ploos" correct?
>>   sun4u   = 0x03, /* V8 ploos ploos */
> 
> Yes, it's a funny way of saying "++" :-)

I see. Thanks for the explanation.

-- 
~Randy

Re: [PATCH] SPARC: backoff.h: delete a duplicated word

[David Miller]

From: Randy Dunlap 
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:00:33 -0700

> Drop the repeated word "other".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap 

Applied, thanks Randy.

> @David:
> In arch/sparc/include/asm/cpu_type.h, line 12,
> is that duplicated "ploos" correct?
>   sun4u   = 0x03, /* V8 ploos ploos */

Yes, it's a funny way of saying "++" :-)

[PATCH] SPARC: backoff.h: delete a duplicated word

[Randy Dunlap]

Drop the repeated word "other".

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap 
Cc: "David S. Miller" 
Cc: sparcli...@vger.kernel.org
---
@David:
In arch/sparc/include/asm/cpu_type.h, line 12,
is that duplicated "ploos" correct?
  sun4u   = 0x03, /* V8 ploos ploos */

 arch/sparc/include/asm/backoff.h |2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-next-20200720.orig/arch/sparc/include/asm/backoff.h
+++ linux-next-20200720/arch/sparc/include/asm/backoff.h
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
  *
  * When we spin, we try to use an operation that will cause the
  * current cpu strand to block, and therefore make the core fully
- * available to any other other runnable strands.  There are two
+ * available to any other runnable strands.  There are two
  * options, based upon cpu capabilities.
  *
  * On all cpus prior to SPARC-T4 we do three dummy reads of the