Re: [PATCH] Use ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK if poll() is interrupted by a signal (was: Re: [PATCH] Use ERESTARTNOHAND if poll() is interrupted by a signal)
On 08/03, Chris Wright wrote:
>
> +long do_restart_poll(struct restart_block *restart_block)
> +{
> + struct pollfd __user *ufds = (struct pollfd __user*)restart_block->arg0;
> + int nfds = restart_block->arg1;
> + s64 timeout = ((s64)restart_block->arg3<<32) | (s64)restart_block->arg2;
> + int ret;
> +
> + restart_block->fn = do_no_restart_syscall;
(just in case, this is not strictly necessary)
> + ret = do_sys_poll(ufds, nfds, );
> + if (ret == -EINTR) {
> + restart_block->fn = do_restart_poll;
> + restart_block->arg2 = timeout & 0x;
> + restart_block->arg3 = timeout >> 32;
> + ret = -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK;
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> asmlinkage long sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds, unsigned int nfds,
> long timeout_msecs)
> {
> s64 timeout_jiffies;
> + int ret;
>
> if (timeout_msecs > 0) {
> #if HZ > 1000
> @@ -754,7 +773,20 @@ asmlinkage long sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds,
> unsigned int nfds,
> timeout_jiffies = timeout_msecs;
> }
>
> - return do_sys_poll(ufds, nfds, _jiffies);
> + ret = do_sys_poll(ufds, nfds, _jiffies);
> + if (ret == -EINTR) {
> + if (timeout_msecs > 0) {
This should be "if (timeout_msecs)", a negative timeout means
"wait indefinitely", so we should restart as well.
> + struct restart_block *restart_block;
> + restart_block = _thread_info()->restart_block;
> + restart_block->fn = do_restart_poll;
> + restart_block->arg0 = (unsigned long)ufds;
> + restart_block->arg1 = nfds;
> + restart_block->arg2 = timeout_jiffies & 0x;
> + restart_block->arg3 = timeout_jiffies >> 32;
and, in that case, we should use "(u64)timeout_jiffies >> 32".
Small nit: sys_poll() and do_restart_poll() are not "symmetrical", the latter
doesn't check *timeout at all. Either way is correct, restart with zero timeout
means "try again once but doesn't wait".
There is a subtle (but harmless) difference though. Suppose that *timeout == 0
(either because timeout_msecs == 0 or because timeout expiried) and we have a
"false" signal_pending(). In that case sys_poll() returns EINTR, but
do_restart_poll()
returns 0.
I was a bit surprized that sys_poll() return EINTR even if timeout expired, but
preserved this behaviour in do_poll-return-eintr-when-signalled.patch.
Perhaps it is better to just remove "if (timeout_msecs > 0)" check from
sys_poll().
Then we can modify do_poll() to return EINTR only when !*timeout, to eliminate
unneeded (but correct) restart.
What do you think?
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH] Use ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK if poll() is interrupted by a signal (was: Re: [PATCH] Use ERESTARTNOHAND if poll() is interrupted by a signal)
* Oleg Nesterov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What we need is ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK, and restart_block.arg2 should
> have the new timeout value, which takes the time we already slept
> into account.
This passes my simple 32-bit and 64-bit testing. See any issues with
this one?
thanks,
-chris
--
Subject: [PATCH] Use ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK if poll() is interrupted by a signal
From: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lomesh reported poll returning EINTR during suspend/resume cycle.
This is caused by the STOP/CONT cycle that the freezer uses, generating
a pending signal for what in effect is an ignored signal. In general
poll is a little eager in returning EINTR, when it could try not bother
userspace and simply restart the syscall. Both select and ppoll do use
ERESTARTNOHAND to restart the syscall. Oleg points out that simply using
ERESTARTNOHAND will cause poll to restart with original timeout value.
which could ultimately lead to process never returning to userspace.
Instead use ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK, and restart poll with updated timeout
value. Inspired by Manfred's use ERESTARTNOHAND in poll patch.
Cc: Manfred Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Agarwal, Lomesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Patch against git-7a883eaf
fs/select.c | 34 +-
1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/select.c b/fs/select.c
index a974082..50e6d8e 100644
--- a/fs/select.c
+++ b/fs/select.c
@@ -736,10 +736,29 @@ out_fds:
return err;
}
+long do_restart_poll(struct restart_block *restart_block)
+{
+ struct pollfd __user *ufds = (struct pollfd __user*)restart_block->arg0;
+ int nfds = restart_block->arg1;
+ s64 timeout = ((s64)restart_block->arg3<<32) | (s64)restart_block->arg2;
+ int ret;
+
+ restart_block->fn = do_no_restart_syscall;
+ ret = do_sys_poll(ufds, nfds, );
+ if (ret == -EINTR) {
+ restart_block->fn = do_restart_poll;
+ restart_block->arg2 = timeout & 0x;
+ restart_block->arg3 = timeout >> 32;
+ ret = -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK;
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
asmlinkage long sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds, unsigned int nfds,
long timeout_msecs)
{
s64 timeout_jiffies;
+ int ret;
if (timeout_msecs > 0) {
#if HZ > 1000
@@ -754,7 +773,20 @@ asmlinkage long sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds,
unsigned int nfds,
timeout_jiffies = timeout_msecs;
}
- return do_sys_poll(ufds, nfds, _jiffies);
+ ret = do_sys_poll(ufds, nfds, _jiffies);
+ if (ret == -EINTR) {
+ if (timeout_msecs > 0) {
+ struct restart_block *restart_block;
+ restart_block = _thread_info()->restart_block;
+ restart_block->fn = do_restart_poll;
+ restart_block->arg0 = (unsigned long)ufds;
+ restart_block->arg1 = nfds;
+ restart_block->arg2 = timeout_jiffies & 0x;
+ restart_block->arg3 = timeout_jiffies >> 32;
+ ret = -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK;
+ }
+ }
+ return ret;
}
#ifdef TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH] Use ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK if poll() is interrupted by a signal (was: Re: [PATCH] Use ERESTARTNOHAND if poll() is interrupted by a signal)
* Oleg Nesterov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
What we need is ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK, and restart_block.arg2 should
have the new timeout value, which takes the time we already slept
into account.
This passes my simple 32-bit and 64-bit testing. See any issues with
this one?
thanks,
-chris
--
Subject: [PATCH] Use ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK if poll() is interrupted by a signal
From: Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lomesh reported poll returning EINTR during suspend/resume cycle.
This is caused by the STOP/CONT cycle that the freezer uses, generating
a pending signal for what in effect is an ignored signal. In general
poll is a little eager in returning EINTR, when it could try not bother
userspace and simply restart the syscall. Both select and ppoll do use
ERESTARTNOHAND to restart the syscall. Oleg points out that simply using
ERESTARTNOHAND will cause poll to restart with original timeout value.
which could ultimately lead to process never returning to userspace.
Instead use ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK, and restart poll with updated timeout
value. Inspired by Manfred's use ERESTARTNOHAND in poll patch.
Cc: Manfred Spraul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Oleg Nesterov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Roland McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Agarwal, Lomesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Patch against git-7a883eaf
fs/select.c | 34 +-
1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/select.c b/fs/select.c
index a974082..50e6d8e 100644
--- a/fs/select.c
+++ b/fs/select.c
@@ -736,10 +736,29 @@ out_fds:
return err;
}
+long do_restart_poll(struct restart_block *restart_block)
+{
+ struct pollfd __user *ufds = (struct pollfd __user*)restart_block-arg0;
+ int nfds = restart_block-arg1;
+ s64 timeout = ((s64)restart_block-arg332) | (s64)restart_block-arg2;
+ int ret;
+
+ restart_block-fn = do_no_restart_syscall;
+ ret = do_sys_poll(ufds, nfds, timeout);
+ if (ret == -EINTR) {
+ restart_block-fn = do_restart_poll;
+ restart_block-arg2 = timeout 0x;
+ restart_block-arg3 = timeout 32;
+ ret = -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK;
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
asmlinkage long sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds, unsigned int nfds,
long timeout_msecs)
{
s64 timeout_jiffies;
+ int ret;
if (timeout_msecs 0) {
#if HZ 1000
@@ -754,7 +773,20 @@ asmlinkage long sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds,
unsigned int nfds,
timeout_jiffies = timeout_msecs;
}
- return do_sys_poll(ufds, nfds, timeout_jiffies);
+ ret = do_sys_poll(ufds, nfds, timeout_jiffies);
+ if (ret == -EINTR) {
+ if (timeout_msecs 0) {
+ struct restart_block *restart_block;
+ restart_block = current_thread_info()-restart_block;
+ restart_block-fn = do_restart_poll;
+ restart_block-arg0 = (unsigned long)ufds;
+ restart_block-arg1 = nfds;
+ restart_block-arg2 = timeout_jiffies 0x;
+ restart_block-arg3 = timeout_jiffies 32;
+ ret = -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK;
+ }
+ }
+ return ret;
}
#ifdef TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] Use ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK if poll() is interrupted by a signal (was: Re: [PATCH] Use ERESTARTNOHAND if poll() is interrupted by a signal)
On 08/03, Chris Wright wrote:
+long do_restart_poll(struct restart_block *restart_block)
+{
+ struct pollfd __user *ufds = (struct pollfd __user*)restart_block-arg0;
+ int nfds = restart_block-arg1;
+ s64 timeout = ((s64)restart_block-arg332) | (s64)restart_block-arg2;
+ int ret;
+
+ restart_block-fn = do_no_restart_syscall;
(just in case, this is not strictly necessary)
+ ret = do_sys_poll(ufds, nfds, timeout);
+ if (ret == -EINTR) {
+ restart_block-fn = do_restart_poll;
+ restart_block-arg2 = timeout 0x;
+ restart_block-arg3 = timeout 32;
+ ret = -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK;
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
asmlinkage long sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds, unsigned int nfds,
long timeout_msecs)
{
s64 timeout_jiffies;
+ int ret;
if (timeout_msecs 0) {
#if HZ 1000
@@ -754,7 +773,20 @@ asmlinkage long sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds,
unsigned int nfds,
timeout_jiffies = timeout_msecs;
}
- return do_sys_poll(ufds, nfds, timeout_jiffies);
+ ret = do_sys_poll(ufds, nfds, timeout_jiffies);
+ if (ret == -EINTR) {
+ if (timeout_msecs 0) {
This should be if (timeout_msecs), a negative timeout means
wait indefinitely, so we should restart as well.
+ struct restart_block *restart_block;
+ restart_block = current_thread_info()-restart_block;
+ restart_block-fn = do_restart_poll;
+ restart_block-arg0 = (unsigned long)ufds;
+ restart_block-arg1 = nfds;
+ restart_block-arg2 = timeout_jiffies 0x;
+ restart_block-arg3 = timeout_jiffies 32;
and, in that case, we should use (u64)timeout_jiffies 32.
Small nit: sys_poll() and do_restart_poll() are not symmetrical, the latter
doesn't check *timeout at all. Either way is correct, restart with zero timeout
means try again once but doesn't wait.
There is a subtle (but harmless) difference though. Suppose that *timeout == 0
(either because timeout_msecs == 0 or because timeout expiried) and we have a
false signal_pending(). In that case sys_poll() returns EINTR, but
do_restart_poll()
returns 0.
I was a bit surprized that sys_poll() return EINTR even if timeout expired, but
preserved this behaviour in do_poll-return-eintr-when-signalled.patch.
Perhaps it is better to just remove if (timeout_msecs 0) check from
sys_poll().
Then we can modify do_poll() to return EINTR only when !*timeout, to eliminate
unneeded (but correct) restart.
What do you think?
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
