Re: [PATCH] block: do not put mq context in blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx

[Jens Axboe]

On 03/29/2017 11:20 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> In blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx, blk_mq_sched_get_request doesn't
> get sw context so we don't need to put the context with
> blk_mq_put_ctx. Unless, we will see preempt counter underflow.

Good catch, that's definitely a bug. I have applied your patch
for 4.11.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Re: [PATCH] block: do not put mq context in blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx

[Sagi Grimberg]

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg 

[PATCH] block: do not put mq context in blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx

[Minchan Kim]

In blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx, blk_mq_sched_get_request doesn't
get sw context so we don't need to put the context with
blk_mq_put_ctx. Unless, we will see preempt counter underflow.

Cc: Sagi Grimberg 
Cc: Omar Sandoval 
Cc: Jens Axboe 
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim 
---

Maybe, it would be fixed by someone but I have noticed preempt counter
undeflow problem a few weeks ago and still see the problem with
linux-next.

 block/blk-mq.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index a4546f060e80..a6f3998dc4ee 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -321,7 +321,6 @@ struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx(struct 
request_queue *q, int rw,
 
rq = blk_mq_sched_get_request(q, NULL, rw, &alloc_data);
 
-   blk_mq_put_ctx(alloc_data.ctx);
blk_queue_exit(q);
 
if (!rq)
-- 
2.7.4