Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: imx6q: Fix error handling code

2017-04-09 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 09-04-17, 09:33, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> According to the previous error handling code, it is likely that
> 'goto out_free_opp' is expected here in order to avoid a memory leak in
> error handling path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET 
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> index 7719b02e04f5..b14117dcfff5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static int imx6q_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>   ret = dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(cpu_dev, &freq_table);
>   if (ret) {
>   dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to init cpufreq table: %d\n", ret);
> - goto put_reg;
> + goto out_free_opp;
>   }
>  
>   /* Make imx6_soc_volt array's size same as arm opp number */

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar 

-- 
viresh


[PATCH] cpufreq: imx6q: Fix error handling code

2017-04-09 Thread Christophe JAILLET
According to the previous error handling code, it is likely that
'goto out_free_opp' is expected here in order to avoid a memory leak in
error handling path.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET 
---
 drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
index 7719b02e04f5..b14117dcfff5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static int imx6q_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ret = dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(cpu_dev, &freq_table);
if (ret) {
dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to init cpufreq table: %d\n", ret);
-   goto put_reg;
+   goto out_free_opp;
}
 
/* Make imx6_soc_volt array's size same as arm opp number */
-- 
2.11.0