Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Fix stack trace entry generated by ftrace_pid_func()
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 08:17:19AM GMT, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > On Sun, 26 May 2024 22:51:53 +0800 > kernel test robot wrote: > > > Hi Tatsuya, > > > > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: > > > > [auto build test WARNING on linus/master] > > [also build test WARNING on rostedt-trace/for-next v6.9 next-20240523] > > [cannot apply to rostedt-trace/for-next-urgent] > > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] > > > > url: > > https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tatsuya-S/ftrace-Fix-stack-trace-entry-generated-by-ftrace_pid_func/20240526-193149 > > base: linus/master > > patch link: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240526112658.46740-1-tatsuya.s2862%40gmail.com > > patch subject: [PATCH] ftrace: Fix stack trace entry generated by > > ftrace_pid_func() > > config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-002-20240526 > > (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240526/202405262232.l4xh8q6o-...@intel.com/config) > > compiler: clang version 18.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project > > 617a15a9eac96088ae5e9134248d8236e34b91b1) > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > > (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240526/202405262232.l4xh8q6o-...@intel.com/reproduce) > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new > > version of > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot > > | Closes: > > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405262232.l4xh8q6o-...@intel.com/ > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > >> kernel/trace/ftrace.c:102:6: warning: no previous prototype for function > > >> 'ftrace_pids_enabled' [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > 102 | bool ftrace_pids_enabled(struct ftrace_ops *ops) > > | ^ > >kernel/trace/ftrace.c:102:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is > > not intended to be used outside of this translation unit > > 102 | bool ftrace_pids_enabled(struct ftrace_ops *ops) > > | ^ > > | static > >1 warning generated. > > This is because the prototype in linux/ftrace.h is placed in the > #ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE block. The prototype needs to be moved > outside of the block. > > Thank you, > > > > > > > vim +/ftrace_pids_enabled +102 kernel/trace/ftrace.c > > > >101 > > > 102 bool ftrace_pids_enabled(struct ftrace_ops *ops) > >103 { > >104 struct trace_array *tr; > >105 > >106 if (!(ops->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_PID) || !ops->private) > >107 return false; > >108 > >109 tr = ops->private; > >110 > >111 return tr->function_pids != NULL || > > tr->function_no_pids != NULL; > >112 } > >113 > > > > -- > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service > > https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki > > > -- > Masami Hiramatsu (Google) I understand. Thank you.
Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Fix stack trace entry generated by ftrace_pid_func()
On Sun, 26 May 2024 22:51:53 +0800 kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Tatsuya, > > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: > > [auto build test WARNING on linus/master] > [also build test WARNING on rostedt-trace/for-next v6.9 next-20240523] > [cannot apply to rostedt-trace/for-next-urgent] > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] > > url: > https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tatsuya-S/ftrace-Fix-stack-trace-entry-generated-by-ftrace_pid_func/20240526-193149 > base: linus/master > patch link: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240526112658.46740-1-tatsuya.s2862%40gmail.com > patch subject: [PATCH] ftrace: Fix stack trace entry generated by > ftrace_pid_func() > config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-002-20240526 > (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240526/202405262232.l4xh8q6o-...@intel.com/config) > compiler: clang version 18.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project > 617a15a9eac96088ae5e9134248d8236e34b91b1) > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240526/202405262232.l4xh8q6o-...@intel.com/reproduce) > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version > of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot > | Closes: > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405262232.l4xh8q6o-...@intel.com/ > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > >> kernel/trace/ftrace.c:102:6: warning: no previous prototype for function > >> 'ftrace_pids_enabled' [-Wmissing-prototypes] > 102 | bool ftrace_pids_enabled(struct ftrace_ops *ops) > | ^ >kernel/trace/ftrace.c:102:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not > intended to be used outside of this translation unit > 102 | bool ftrace_pids_enabled(struct ftrace_ops *ops) > | ^ > | static >1 warning generated. This is because the prototype in linux/ftrace.h is placed in the #ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE block. The prototype needs to be moved outside of the block. Thank you, > > > vim +/ftrace_pids_enabled +102 kernel/trace/ftrace.c > >101 > > 102bool ftrace_pids_enabled(struct ftrace_ops *ops) >103{ >104struct trace_array *tr; >105 >106if (!(ops->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_PID) || !ops->private) >107return false; >108 >109tr = ops->private; >110 >111return tr->function_pids != NULL || > tr->function_no_pids != NULL; >112} >113 > > -- > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service > https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki -- Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Fix stack trace entry generated by ftrace_pid_func()
Hi Tatsuya, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on linus/master] [also build test WARNING on rostedt-trace/for-next v6.9 next-20240523] [cannot apply to rostedt-trace/for-next-urgent] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tatsuya-S/ftrace-Fix-stack-trace-entry-generated-by-ftrace_pid_func/20240526-193149 base: linus/master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240526112658.46740-1-tatsuya.s2862%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH] ftrace: Fix stack trace entry generated by ftrace_pid_func() config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-002-20240526 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240526/202405262232.l4xh8q6o-...@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 18.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 617a15a9eac96088ae5e9134248d8236e34b91b1) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240526/202405262232.l4xh8q6o-...@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405262232.l4xh8q6o-...@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> kernel/trace/ftrace.c:102:6: warning: no previous prototype for function >> 'ftrace_pids_enabled' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 102 | bool ftrace_pids_enabled(struct ftrace_ops *ops) | ^ kernel/trace/ftrace.c:102:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit 102 | bool ftrace_pids_enabled(struct ftrace_ops *ops) | ^ | static 1 warning generated. vim +/ftrace_pids_enabled +102 kernel/trace/ftrace.c 101 > 102 bool ftrace_pids_enabled(struct ftrace_ops *ops) 103 { 104 struct trace_array *tr; 105 106 if (!(ops->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_PID) || !ops->private) 107 return false; 108 109 tr = ops->private; 110 111 return tr->function_pids != NULL || tr->function_no_pids != NULL; 112 } 113 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
[PATCH] ftrace: Fix stack trace entry generated by ftrace_pid_func()
On setting set_ftrace_pid, a extra entry generated by ftrace_pid_func() is shown on stack trace(CONFIG_UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER=y). [004] .68.459382: => 0xa00090af => ksys_read => __x64_sys_read => x64_sys_call => do_syscall_64 => entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe To resolve this issue, increment skip count in function_stack_trace_call() if pids are set. Signed-off-by: Tatsuya S --- include/linux/ftrace.h | 1 + kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 2 +- kernel/trace/trace_functions.c | 7 ++- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace.h b/include/linux/ftrace.h index 800995c425e0..d14447c0d0e9 100644 --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h @@ -666,6 +666,7 @@ unsigned long ftrace_location(unsigned long ip); unsigned long ftrace_location_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end); unsigned long ftrace_get_addr_new(struct dyn_ftrace *rec); unsigned long ftrace_get_addr_curr(struct dyn_ftrace *rec); +bool ftrace_pids_enabled(struct ftrace_ops *ops); extern ftrace_func_t ftrace_trace_function; diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c index 65208d3b5ed9..e8ddd56d1e55 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ struct ftrace_ops *function_trace_op __read_mostly = _list_end; /* What to set function_trace_op to */ static struct ftrace_ops *set_function_trace_op; -static bool ftrace_pids_enabled(struct ftrace_ops *ops) +bool ftrace_pids_enabled(struct ftrace_ops *ops) { struct trace_array *tr; diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c b/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c index 9f1bfbe105e8..455c9a880199 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c @@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ function_stack_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip, long disabled; int cpu; unsigned int trace_ctx; + int skip = STACK_SKIP; if (unlikely(!tr->function_enabled)) return; @@ -239,7 +240,11 @@ function_stack_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip, if (likely(disabled == 1)) { trace_ctx = tracing_gen_ctx_flags(flags); trace_function(tr, ip, parent_ip, trace_ctx); - __trace_stack(tr, trace_ctx, STACK_SKIP); +#ifdef CONFIG_UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER + if (ftrace_pids_enabled(op)) + skip++; +#endif + __trace_stack(tr, trace_ctx, skip); } atomic_dec(>disabled); -- 2.45.1