Re: [PATCH] i2c: do not acpi/of match device in i2c_device_probe()
On (20/08/26 23:49), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> i2c, apparently, can match the same device twice - the first
> time in ->match bus hook (i2c_device_match()), and the second
> one in ->probe (i2c_device_probe()) bus hook.
>
> To make things more complicated, the second matching does not
> do exactly same checks as the first one. Namely, i2c_device_match()
> calls acpi_driver_match_device() which considers devices that
> provide of_match_table and performs of_compatible() matching for
> such devices. One important thing to note here is that ACPI
> of_compatible() matching (acpi_of_match_device()) is part of ACPI
> and does not depend on CONFIG_OF.
>
> i2c_device_probe(), on the other hand, calls acpi_match_device()
> which does not perform of_compatible() matching, but instead
> i2c_device_probe() relies on CONFIG_OF API to perform of_match_table
> matching, IOW ->probe matching, unlike ->match matching, depends on
> CONFIG_OF. This can break i2c device probing on !CONFIG_OF systems
> if the device does not provide .id_table.
>
> i2c_device_probe()
> ...
>if (!driver->id_table &&
>!i2c_acpi_match_device(dev->driver->acpi_match_table, client) &&
>!i2c_of_match_device(dev->driver->of_match_table, client)) {
>status = -ENODEV;
>goto put_sync_adapter;
>}
>
> i2c_of_match_device() on !CONFIG_OF systems is always false, so we never
> perform of_match_table matching. i2c_acpi_match_device() does ACPI match
> only, no of_compatible() matching takes place, even though the device
> provides .of_match_table and ACPI is capable of matching such device.
>
> It is not entirely clear why the device is matched again in bus
> ->probe after successful and proper matching in bus ->match. Let's
> remove ->probe matching.
Hi,
Gentle ping.
-ss
Re: [PATCH] i2c: do not acpi/of match device in i2c_device_probe()
On (20/08/26 18:16), Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:49:20PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > i2c, apparently, can match the same device twice - the first
> > time in ->match bus hook (i2c_device_match()), and the second
> > one in ->probe (i2c_device_probe()) bus hook.
> >
> > To make things more complicated, the second matching does not
> > do exactly same checks as the first one. Namely, i2c_device_match()
> > calls acpi_driver_match_device() which considers devices that
> > provide of_match_table and performs of_compatible() matching for
> > such devices. One important thing to note here is that ACPI
> > of_compatible() matching (acpi_of_match_device()) is part of ACPI
> > and does not depend on CONFIG_OF.
> >
> > i2c_device_probe(), on the other hand, calls acpi_match_device()
> > which does not perform of_compatible() matching, but instead
> > i2c_device_probe() relies on CONFIG_OF API to perform of_match_table
> > matching, IOW ->probe matching, unlike ->match matching, depends on
> > CONFIG_OF. This can break i2c device probing on !CONFIG_OF systems
> > if the device does not provide .id_table.
> >
> > i2c_device_probe()
> > ...
> >if (!driver->id_table &&
> >!i2c_acpi_match_device(dev->driver->acpi_match_table, client) &&
> >!i2c_of_match_device(dev->driver->of_match_table, client)) {
> >status = -ENODEV;
> >goto put_sync_adapter;
> >}
> >
> > i2c_of_match_device() on !CONFIG_OF systems is always false, so we never
> > perform of_match_table matching. i2c_acpi_match_device() does ACPI match
> > only, no of_compatible() matching takes place, even though the device
> > provides .of_match_table and ACPI is capable of matching such device.
> >
> > It is not entirely clear why the device is matched again in bus
> > ->probe after successful and proper matching in bus ->match. Let's
> > remove ->probe matching.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko
> (assuming it's okay to go)
Thanks.
I tested the patch on x86_64 (a mix of i2c devices with and without
.id_table) and arm64 boards - didn't notice any difference, module
probing wise.
-ss
Re: [PATCH] i2c: do not acpi/of match device in i2c_device_probe()
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:49:20PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> i2c, apparently, can match the same device twice - the first
> time in ->match bus hook (i2c_device_match()), and the second
> one in ->probe (i2c_device_probe()) bus hook.
>
> To make things more complicated, the second matching does not
> do exactly same checks as the first one. Namely, i2c_device_match()
> calls acpi_driver_match_device() which considers devices that
> provide of_match_table and performs of_compatible() matching for
> such devices. One important thing to note here is that ACPI
> of_compatible() matching (acpi_of_match_device()) is part of ACPI
> and does not depend on CONFIG_OF.
>
> i2c_device_probe(), on the other hand, calls acpi_match_device()
> which does not perform of_compatible() matching, but instead
> i2c_device_probe() relies on CONFIG_OF API to perform of_match_table
> matching, IOW ->probe matching, unlike ->match matching, depends on
> CONFIG_OF. This can break i2c device probing on !CONFIG_OF systems
> if the device does not provide .id_table.
>
> i2c_device_probe()
> ...
>if (!driver->id_table &&
>!i2c_acpi_match_device(dev->driver->acpi_match_table, client) &&
>!i2c_of_match_device(dev->driver->of_match_table, client)) {
>status = -ENODEV;
>goto put_sync_adapter;
>}
>
> i2c_of_match_device() on !CONFIG_OF systems is always false, so we never
> perform of_match_table matching. i2c_acpi_match_device() does ACPI match
> only, no of_compatible() matching takes place, even though the device
> provides .of_match_table and ACPI is capable of matching such device.
>
> It is not entirely clear why the device is matched again in bus
> ->probe after successful and proper matching in bus ->match. Let's
> remove ->probe matching.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko
(assuming it's okay to go)
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky
> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko
> ---
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 11 ---
> 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> index 5ec082e2039d..77eea5c0bc71 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> @@ -475,17 +475,6 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>
> driver = to_i2c_driver(dev->driver);
>
> - /*
> - * An I2C ID table is not mandatory, if and only if, a suitable OF
> - * or ACPI ID table is supplied for the probing device.
> - */
> - if (!driver->id_table &&
> - !acpi_driver_match_device(dev, dev->driver) &&
> - !i2c_of_match_device(dev->driver->of_match_table, client)) {
> - status = -ENODEV;
> - goto put_sync_adapter;
> - }
> -
> if (client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_WAKE) {
> int wakeirq;
>
> --
> 2.28.0
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
[PATCH] i2c: do not acpi/of match device in i2c_device_probe()
i2c, apparently, can match the same device twice - the first
time in ->match bus hook (i2c_device_match()), and the second
one in ->probe (i2c_device_probe()) bus hook.
To make things more complicated, the second matching does not
do exactly same checks as the first one. Namely, i2c_device_match()
calls acpi_driver_match_device() which considers devices that
provide of_match_table and performs of_compatible() matching for
such devices. One important thing to note here is that ACPI
of_compatible() matching (acpi_of_match_device()) is part of ACPI
and does not depend on CONFIG_OF.
i2c_device_probe(), on the other hand, calls acpi_match_device()
which does not perform of_compatible() matching, but instead
i2c_device_probe() relies on CONFIG_OF API to perform of_match_table
matching, IOW ->probe matching, unlike ->match matching, depends on
CONFIG_OF. This can break i2c device probing on !CONFIG_OF systems
if the device does not provide .id_table.
i2c_device_probe()
...
if (!driver->id_table &&
!i2c_acpi_match_device(dev->driver->acpi_match_table, client) &&
!i2c_of_match_device(dev->driver->of_match_table, client)) {
status = -ENODEV;
goto put_sync_adapter;
}
i2c_of_match_device() on !CONFIG_OF systems is always false, so we never
perform of_match_table matching. i2c_acpi_match_device() does ACPI match
only, no of_compatible() matching takes place, even though the device
provides .of_match_table and ACPI is capable of matching such device.
It is not entirely clear why the device is matched again in bus
->probe after successful and proper matching in bus ->match. Let's
remove ->probe matching.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko
---
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 11 ---
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
index 5ec082e2039d..77eea5c0bc71 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
@@ -475,17 +475,6 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
driver = to_i2c_driver(dev->driver);
- /*
-* An I2C ID table is not mandatory, if and only if, a suitable OF
-* or ACPI ID table is supplied for the probing device.
-*/
- if (!driver->id_table &&
- !acpi_driver_match_device(dev, dev->driver) &&
- !i2c_of_match_device(dev->driver->of_match_table, client)) {
- status = -ENODEV;
- goto put_sync_adapter;
- }
-
if (client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_WAKE) {
int wakeirq;
--
2.28.0
