Re: [PATCH] max732x_probe: remove redundant check

2020-06-22 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
czw., 18 cze 2020 o 01:58 Gaurav Singh  napisaƂ(a):
>
> The check : if (pdata) is redundant since its already
> dereferenced before: pdata->have_64bit_regs;
> pdata is not initialized after that hence remove
> this null check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Singh 
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c
> index 5fb0bcf31142..63472f308857 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c
> @@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ static int max732x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> -   if (pdata && pdata->setup) {
> +   if (pdata->setup) {
> ret = pdata->setup(client, chip->gpio_chip.base,
> chip->gpio_chip.ngpio, pdata->context);
> if (ret < 0)
> --
> 2.17.1
>

The subject should be 'gpio: max732x: ...". I fixed it up and applied
the path to for-next.

Bartosz


[PATCH] max732x_probe: remove redundant check

2020-06-20 Thread Gaurav Singh
The pdata is already checked for its validity.
Remove the redundant check.

Signed-off-by: Gaurav Singh 
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c
index 5fb0bcf31142..63472f308857 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ static int max732x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
if (ret)
return ret;
 
-   if (pdata && pdata->setup) {
+   if (pdata->setup) {
ret = pdata->setup(client, chip->gpio_chip.base,
chip->gpio_chip.ngpio, pdata->context);
if (ret < 0)
-- 
2.17.1



Re: [PATCH] max732x_probe: remove redundant check

2020-06-20 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 1:36 PM Gaurav Singh  wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Singh 
>
> The pdata is already checked for its validity. Remove
> this redundant check.

Patch applied.

Please put signed-off-by at the end of the mail.

Yours,
Linus Walleij


[PATCH] max732x_probe: remove redundant check

2020-06-17 Thread Gaurav Singh
The check : if (pdata) is redundant since its already
dereferenced before: pdata->have_64bit_regs;
pdata is not initialized after that hence remove 
this null check.

Signed-off-by: Gaurav Singh 
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c
index 5fb0bcf31142..63472f308857 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ static int max732x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
if (ret)
return ret;
 
-   if (pdata && pdata->setup) {
+   if (pdata->setup) {
ret = pdata->setup(client, chip->gpio_chip.base,
chip->gpio_chip.ngpio, pdata->context);
if (ret < 0)
-- 
2.17.1



[PATCH] max732x_probe: remove redundant check

2020-06-10 Thread Gaurav Singh
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Singh 

The pdata is already checked for its validity. Remove
this redundant check.

---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c
index 5fb0bcf31142..63472f308857 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-max732x.c
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ static int max732x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
if (ret)
return ret;
 
-   if (pdata && pdata->setup) {
+   if (pdata->setup) {
ret = pdata->setup(client, chip->gpio_chip.base,
chip->gpio_chip.ngpio, pdata->context);
if (ret < 0)
-- 
2.17.1



Re: [PATCH] max732x_probe: remove redundant check

2020-06-10 Thread Linus Walleij
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 5:09 PM gaurav singh  wrote:

> The pdata is already checked for its validity above:
>
> if (!pdata) {
> dev_dbg(>dev, "no platform data\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> So no need to check again. Hence remove the if (pdata) part. Please find the 
> patch below.

Please send the patch as a single main using git send-email.

For further help see:
Documentation/process/email-clients.rst

Yours,
Linus Walleij