Re: [PATCH] mm,thp: recheck each page before collapsing file THP

2019-10-18 Thread Song Liu



> On Oct 18, 2019, at 8:41 AM, Rik van Riel  wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 16:34 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:08:32PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
>>> In collapse_file(), after locking the page, it is necessary to
>>> recheck
>>> that the page is up-to-date, clean, and pointing to the proper
>>> mapping.
>>> If any check fails, abort the collapse.
>>> 
>>> Fixes: 99cb0dbd47a1 ("mm,thp: add read-only THP support for (non-
>>> shmem) FS")
>>> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov 
>>> Cc: Johannes Weiner 
>>> Cc: Hugh Dickins 
>>> Cc: William Kucharski 
>>> Cc: Andrew Morton 
>>> Signed-off-by: Song Liu 
>>> ---
>>> mm/khugepaged.c | 8 
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> index 0a1b4b484ac5..7da49b643c4d 100644
>>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
>>> @@ -1619,6 +1619,14 @@ static void collapse_file(struct mm_struct
>>> *mm,
>>> result = SCAN_PAGE_LOCK;
>>> goto xa_locked;
>>> }
>>> +
>>> +   /* double check the page is correct and clean
>>> */
>>> +   if (unlikely(!PageUptodate(page)) ||
>>> +   unlikely(PageDirty(page)) ||
>>> +   unlikely(page->mapping != mapping)) {
>>> +   result = SCAN_FAIL;
>>> +   goto out_unlock;
>>> +   }
>>> }
>>> 
>>> /*
>> 
>> Hm. But why only for !is_shmem? Or I read it wrong?
> 
> It looks like the shmem code path has its own way of bailing
> out when a page is !PageUptodate. Also, shmem can handle dirty
> pages fine.

Seems the PageUptodate check is still necessary for shmem? 
shmem_getpage() makes sure the page is uptodate, but these is still
a small window that the page could become !uptodate. 

> 
> However, I suppose the shmem code might want to check for truncated
> pages, which it does not curretnly appear to do. I guess doing
> the trylock_page under the xarray lock may protect against truncate,
> but that is subtle enough that at the very least it should be
> documented.

Johannes pointed out in our internal code review that, there is 
already a page_mapping() check later in the function. 

PageDirty check is only necessary for !is_shmem. And it should not 
happen, because we only support read-only text. Adding a warning for
it. Also, move PageDirty check to after page_mapping() check, because
if truncate happens, the PageDirty doesn't violent the read-only
assumption. 

Overall, I guess we need something like:

= 8< =
diff --git c/mm/khugepaged.c w/mm/khugepaged.c
index 0a1b4b484ac5..40c549302d36 100644
--- c/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ w/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -1626,7 +1626,12 @@ static void collapse_file(struct mm_struct *mm,
 * without racing with truncate.
 */
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
-   VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageUptodate(page), page);
+
+   /* double check the page is up to date */
+   if (unlikely(!PageUptodate(page))) {
+   result = SCAN_FAIL;
+   goto out_unlock;
+   }

/*
 * If file was truncated then extended, or hole-punched, before
@@ -1642,6 +1647,15 @@ static void collapse_file(struct mm_struct *mm,
goto out_unlock;
}

+   /*
+* khugepaged should not try to collapse dirty pages for
+* file THP. Show warning if this somehow happens.
+*/
+   if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_shmem && PageDirty(page))) {
+   result = SCAN_FAIL;
+   goto out_unlock;
+   }
+
if (isolate_lru_page(page)) {
result = SCAN_DEL_PAGE_LRU;
goto out_unlock;

= 8< =

Thanks,
Song



Re: [PATCH] mm,thp: recheck each page before collapsing file THP

2019-10-18 Thread Rik van Riel
On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 16:34 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:08:32PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> > In collapse_file(), after locking the page, it is necessary to
> > recheck
> > that the page is up-to-date, clean, and pointing to the proper
> > mapping.
> > If any check fails, abort the collapse.
> > 
> > Fixes: 99cb0dbd47a1 ("mm,thp: add read-only THP support for (non-
> > shmem) FS")
> > Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov 
> > Cc: Johannes Weiner 
> > Cc: Hugh Dickins 
> > Cc: William Kucharski 
> > Cc: Andrew Morton 
> > Signed-off-by: Song Liu 
> > ---
> >  mm/khugepaged.c | 8 
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> > index 0a1b4b484ac5..7da49b643c4d 100644
> > --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> > +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> > @@ -1619,6 +1619,14 @@ static void collapse_file(struct mm_struct
> > *mm,
> > result = SCAN_PAGE_LOCK;
> > goto xa_locked;
> > }
> > +
> > +   /* double check the page is correct and clean
> > */
> > +   if (unlikely(!PageUptodate(page)) ||
> > +   unlikely(PageDirty(page)) ||
> > +   unlikely(page->mapping != mapping)) {
> > +   result = SCAN_FAIL;
> > +   goto out_unlock;
> > +   }
> > }
> >  
> > /*
> 
> Hm. But why only for !is_shmem? Or I read it wrong?

It looks like the shmem code path has its own way of bailing
out when a page is !PageUptodate. Also, shmem can handle dirty
pages fine.

However, I suppose the shmem code might want to check for truncated
pages, which it does not curretnly appear to do. I guess doing
the trylock_page under the xarray lock may protect against truncate,
but that is subtle enough that at the very least it should be
documented.




Re: [PATCH] mm,thp: recheck each page before collapsing file THP

2019-10-18 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:08:32PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> + /* double check the page is correct and clean */
> + if (unlikely(!PageUptodate(page)) ||
> + unlikely(PageDirty(page)) ||
> + unlikely(page->mapping != mapping)) {

That's kind of an ugly way of writing it.  Why not more simply:

if (unlikely(!PageUptodate(page) || PageDirty(page) ||
 page->mapping != mapping)) {



Re: [PATCH] mm,thp: recheck each page before collapsing file THP

2019-10-18 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:08:32PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> In collapse_file(), after locking the page, it is necessary to recheck
> that the page is up-to-date, clean, and pointing to the proper mapping.
> If any check fails, abort the collapse.
> 
> Fixes: 99cb0dbd47a1 ("mm,thp: add read-only THP support for (non-shmem) FS")
> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov 
> Cc: Johannes Weiner 
> Cc: Hugh Dickins 
> Cc: William Kucharski 
> Cc: Andrew Morton 
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu 
> ---
>  mm/khugepaged.c | 8 
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index 0a1b4b484ac5..7da49b643c4d 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -1619,6 +1619,14 @@ static void collapse_file(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   result = SCAN_PAGE_LOCK;
>   goto xa_locked;
>   }
> +
> + /* double check the page is correct and clean */
> + if (unlikely(!PageUptodate(page)) ||
> + unlikely(PageDirty(page)) ||
> + unlikely(page->mapping != mapping)) {
> + result = SCAN_FAIL;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
>   }
>  
>   /*

Hm. But why only for !is_shmem? Or I read it wrong?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov


Re: [PATCH] mm,thp: recheck each page before collapsing file THP

2019-10-18 Thread Rik van Riel
On Thu, 2019-10-17 at 22:08 -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> In collapse_file(), after locking the page, it is necessary to
> recheck
> that the page is up-to-date, clean, and pointing to the proper
> mapping.
> If any check fails, abort the collapse.
> 
> Fixes: 99cb0dbd47a1 ("mm,thp: add read-only THP support for (non-
> shmem) FS")
> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov 
> Cc: Johannes Weiner 
> Cc: Hugh Dickins 
> Cc: William Kucharski 
> Cc: Andrew Morton 
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu 

Acked-by: Rik van Riel 



[PATCH] mm,thp: recheck each page before collapsing file THP

2019-10-17 Thread Song Liu
In collapse_file(), after locking the page, it is necessary to recheck
that the page is up-to-date, clean, and pointing to the proper mapping.
If any check fails, abort the collapse.

Fixes: 99cb0dbd47a1 ("mm,thp: add read-only THP support for (non-shmem) FS")
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov 
Cc: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: Hugh Dickins 
Cc: William Kucharski 
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Signed-off-by: Song Liu 
---
 mm/khugepaged.c | 8 
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 0a1b4b484ac5..7da49b643c4d 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -1619,6 +1619,14 @@ static void collapse_file(struct mm_struct *mm,
result = SCAN_PAGE_LOCK;
goto xa_locked;
}
+
+   /* double check the page is correct and clean */
+   if (unlikely(!PageUptodate(page)) ||
+   unlikely(PageDirty(page)) ||
+   unlikely(page->mapping != mapping)) {
+   result = SCAN_FAIL;
+   goto out_unlock;
+   }
}
 
/*
-- 
2.17.1