Re: [PATCH] ptp_pch: include ethernet driver for external functions
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:51:28AM +0100, Ben Dooks (Codethink) wrote: > The driver uses a number of functions from the ethernet driver > so include the header to remove the following warnings from > sparse about undeclared functions: > > drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:182:5: warning: symbol 'pch_ch_control_read' was not > declared. Should it be static? That one is never used and should be removed. > drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:193:6: warning: symbol 'pch_ch_control_write' was not > declared. Should it be static? > drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:201:5: warning: symbol 'pch_ch_event_read' was not > declared. Should it be static? > drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:212:6: warning: symbol 'pch_ch_event_write' was not > declared. Should it be static? > drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:220:5: warning: symbol 'pch_src_uuid_lo_read' was not > declared. Should it be static? > drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:231:5: warning: symbol 'pch_src_uuid_hi_read' was not > declared. Should it be static? > drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:242:5: warning: symbol 'pch_rx_snap_read' was not > declared. Should it be static? > drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:259:5: warning: symbol 'pch_tx_snap_read' was not > declared. Should it be static? > drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:300:5: warning: symbol 'pch_set_station_address' was > not declared. Should it be static? > +#include <../net/ethernet/oki-semi/pch_gbe/pch_gbe.h> Instead of that long relative path, just move ptp_pch.c out of drivers/ptp and into drivers/net/ethernet/oki-semi/pch_gbe. Then move the shared declarations out of pch_gbe.h and into a new header file, included by both users with: #include "ptp_pch.h" Thanks, Richard
Re: [PATCH] ptp_pch: include ethernet driver for external functions
On 18/10/2019 11:51, Ben Dooks (Codethink) wrote: The driver uses a number of functions from the ethernet driver so include the header to remove the following warnings from sparse about undeclared functions: drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:182:5: warning: symbol 'pch_ch_control_read' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:193:6: warning: symbol 'pch_ch_control_write' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:201:5: warning: symbol 'pch_ch_event_read' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:212:6: warning: symbol 'pch_ch_event_write' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:220:5: warning: symbol 'pch_src_uuid_lo_read' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:231:5: warning: symbol 'pch_src_uuid_hi_read' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:242:5: warning: symbol 'pch_rx_snap_read' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:259:5: warning: symbol 'pch_tx_snap_read' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:300:5: warning: symbol 'pch_set_station_address' was not declared. Should it be static? Should we include the header file from the ethernet driver directly or if not, where should the declarations go? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks (Codethink) --- Cc: Richard Cochran Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c index dcd6e00c8046..2bb1184b6359 100644 --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ #include #include +#include <../net/ethernet/oki-semi/pch_gbe/pch_gbe.h> oops, missed saving the version with ../../drivers/net + #define STATION_ADDR_LEN 20 #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_PCH_15880x8819 #define IO_MEM_BAR 1 -- Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/ Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html
[PATCH] ptp_pch: include ethernet driver for external functions
The driver uses a number of functions from the ethernet driver so include the header to remove the following warnings from sparse about undeclared functions: drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:182:5: warning: symbol 'pch_ch_control_read' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:193:6: warning: symbol 'pch_ch_control_write' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:201:5: warning: symbol 'pch_ch_event_read' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:212:6: warning: symbol 'pch_ch_event_write' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:220:5: warning: symbol 'pch_src_uuid_lo_read' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:231:5: warning: symbol 'pch_src_uuid_hi_read' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:242:5: warning: symbol 'pch_rx_snap_read' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:259:5: warning: symbol 'pch_tx_snap_read' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c:300:5: warning: symbol 'pch_set_station_address' was not declared. Should it be static? Should we include the header file from the ethernet driver directly or if not, where should the declarations go? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks (Codethink) --- Cc: Richard Cochran Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c index dcd6e00c8046..2bb1184b6359 100644 --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_pch.c @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ #include #include +#include <../net/ethernet/oki-semi/pch_gbe/pch_gbe.h> + #define STATION_ADDR_LEN 20 #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_PCH_1588 0x8819 #define IO_MEM_BAR 1 -- 2.23.0
