On 04/02/2021 08:37, Yang Li wrote:
> This patch removes unneeded return variables, using only
> '1' instead.
> It fixes the following warning detected by coccinelle:
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot
> Signed-off-by: Yang Li
> ---
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
> index 95caad7..31f97f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
> @@ -3376,7 +3376,6 @@ struct lpfc_hbq_init *lpfc_hbq_defs[] = {
> struct lpfc_iocbq *saveq)
> {
> struct lpfc_iocbq *cmdiocbp;
> - int rc = 1;
> unsigned long iflag;
>
> cmdiocbp = lpfc_sli_iocbq_lookup(phba, pring, saveq);
> @@ -3501,7 +3500,7 @@ struct lpfc_hbq_init *lpfc_hbq_defs[] = {
> }
> }
>
> - return rc;
> + return 1;
> }
>
> /**
>
I suppose this is in 'lpfc_sli_process_sol_iocb()'. It's return
value doesn't get handled either:
case LPFC_SOL_IOCB:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(>hbalock, iflag);
rc = lpfc_sli_process_sol_iocb(phba, pring, saveq);
spin_lock_irqsave(>hbalock, iflag);
break;
[...]
}
if (free_saveq) {
list_for_each_entry_safe(rspiocbp, next_iocb,
>list, list) {
list_del_init(>list);
__lpfc_sli_release_iocbq(phba, rspiocbp);
}
__lpfc_sli_release_iocbq(phba, saveq);
}
rspiocbp = NULL;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(>hbalock, iflag);
return rspiocbp;
}
