The sup->hash_algo is a __le16, and whilst 0xffff is the same in __le16 and u16, it would be better to use cpu_to_le16() anyway (which should deal with constants) and silence the following sparse warning:
fs/ubifs/sb.c:187:32: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) fs/ubifs/sb.c:187:32: expected restricted __le16 [usertype] hash_algo fs/ubifs/sb.c:187:32: got int Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.do...@codethink.co.uk> --- Cc: Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedeki...@gmail.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com> Cc: linux-...@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- fs/ubifs/sb.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ubifs/sb.c b/fs/ubifs/sb.c index a551eb3e9b89..2b7c04bf8983 100644 --- a/fs/ubifs/sb.c +++ b/fs/ubifs/sb.c @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static int create_default_filesystem(struct ubifs_info *c) if (err) goto out; } else { - sup->hash_algo = 0xffff; + sup->hash_algo = cpu_to_le16(0xffff); } sup->ch.node_type = UBIFS_SB_NODE; -- 2.23.0