Re: [PATCH -next] soc: ti: pm33xx: Make two symbols static

[Tony Lindgren]

* Yue Haibing  [190413 07:13]:
> From: YueHaibing 
> 
> Fix sparse warnings:
> 
> drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c:144:27: warning: symbol 'rtc_wake_src' was not 
> declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c:160:5: warning: symbol 'am33xx_rtc_only_idle' was not 
> declared. Should it be static?

Applying into fixes thanks.

Tony

[PATCH -next] soc: ti: pm33xx: Make two symbols static

[Yue Haibing]

From: YueHaibing 

Fix sparse warnings:

drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c:144:27: warning: symbol 'rtc_wake_src' was not 
declared. Should it be static?
drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c:160:5: warning: symbol 'am33xx_rtc_only_idle' was not 
declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: YueHaibing 
---
 drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c b/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c
index fc5802c..b22383c 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static int __init am43xx_map_gic(void)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
-struct wkup_m3_wakeup_src rtc_wake_src(void)
+static struct wkup_m3_wakeup_src rtc_wake_src(void)
 {
u32 i;
 
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ struct wkup_m3_wakeup_src rtc_wake_src(void)
return rtc_ext_wakeup;
 }
 
-int am33xx_rtc_only_idle(unsigned long wfi_flags)
+static int am33xx_rtc_only_idle(unsigned long wfi_flags)
 {
omap_rtc_power_off_program(_rtc->dev);
am33xx_do_wfi_sram(wfi_flags);
-- 
2.7.4