Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
From: Rashika Kheria Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 16:38:16 +0530 > Include appropriate header file ide-cd.h in ide-cd_verbose.c because > function ide_cd_log_error() has its prototype declaration in ide-cd.h. > Also, include linux/ide.h because it contains certain declarations > necessary for including ide-cd.h. > > This eliminates the following warnings in ide-cd_verbose.c: > drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c:251:6: warning: no previous prototype for > ‘ide_cd_log_error’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria Applied.
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
From: Rashika Kheria rashika.khe...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 16:38:16 +0530 Include appropriate header file ide-cd.h in ide-cd_verbose.c because function ide_cd_log_error() has its prototype declaration in ide-cd.h. Also, include linux/ide.h because it contains certain declarations necessary for including ide-cd.h. This eliminates the following warnings in ide-cd_verbose.c: drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c:251:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ide_cd_log_error’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria rashika.khe...@gmail.com Applied.
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
On 12/17/2013 10:06 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: You're right in your doubting: there are quite a lot of drivers used by embedded platforms that nobody has bothered to convert to libata thus far. Hold on, what does that mean? IDE is back from the dead and used only for embedded stuff? Like jazz, IDE "is not dead, it just smells funny". Or we force people to convert drivers to libata by *deleting* ide? I hope not. To me, it would be a shame e.g. to delete more or less well-designed IDE taskfile interface to the ad-hockery that libata has in its place... :-) WBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
Hey Bart, long time no see! :-) On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 02:23:52PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > No, it means that there are legacy PATA chipsets (some used by embedded > platforms) that are only supported by IDE host drivers. I know what it means - I was asking a provocative question. :) > If there is a need I should be able to help in converting these > leftover drivers before we delete IDE. Once I find some time I will go > over all IDE host drivers, make a list of affected hardware and start > a discussion on IDE removal. While this is a generous offer, I'd leave it to the people who actually need that functionality to do the conversion themselves. But this is just me. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
Hi, On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 08:06:10 PM Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:42:54PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > You're right in your doubting: there are quite a lot of drivers used > > by embedded platforms that nobody has bothered to convert to libata > > thus far. > > Hold on, what does that mean? IDE is back from the dead and used only > for embedded stuff? No, it means that there are legacy PATA chipsets (some used by embedded platforms) that are only supported by IDE host drivers. > Or we force people to convert drivers to libata by *deleting* ide? > > :-) If there is a need I should be able to help in converting these leftover drivers before we delete IDE. Once I find some time I will go over all IDE host drivers, make a list of affected hardware and start a discussion on IDE removal. Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R Institute Poland Samsung Electronics -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
Hi, On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 08:06:10 PM Borislav Petkov wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:42:54PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: You're right in your doubting: there are quite a lot of drivers used by embedded platforms that nobody has bothered to convert to libata thus far. Hold on, what does that mean? IDE is back from the dead and used only for embedded stuff? No, it means that there are legacy PATA chipsets (some used by embedded platforms) that are only supported by IDE host drivers. Or we force people to convert drivers to libata by *deleting* ide? :-) If there is a need I should be able to help in converting these leftover drivers before we delete IDE. Once I find some time I will go over all IDE host drivers, make a list of affected hardware and start a discussion on IDE removal. Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung RD Institute Poland Samsung Electronics -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
Hey Bart, long time no see! :-) On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 02:23:52PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: No, it means that there are legacy PATA chipsets (some used by embedded platforms) that are only supported by IDE host drivers. I know what it means - I was asking a provocative question. :) If there is a need I should be able to help in converting these leftover drivers before we delete IDE. Once I find some time I will go over all IDE host drivers, make a list of affected hardware and start a discussion on IDE removal. While this is a generous offer, I'd leave it to the people who actually need that functionality to do the conversion themselves. But this is just me. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
On 12/17/2013 10:06 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: You're right in your doubting: there are quite a lot of drivers used by embedded platforms that nobody has bothered to convert to libata thus far. Hold on, what does that mean? IDE is back from the dead and used only for embedded stuff? Like jazz, IDE is not dead, it just smells funny. Or we force people to convert drivers to libata by *deleting* ide? I hope not. To me, it would be a shame e.g. to delete more or less well-designed IDE taskfile interface to the ad-hockery that libata has in its place... :-) WBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:42:54PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > You're right in your doubting: there are quite a lot of drivers used > by embedded platforms that nobody has bothered to convert to libata > thus far. Hold on, what does that mean? IDE is back from the dead and used only for embedded stuff? Or we force people to convert drivers to libata by *deleting* ide? :-) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
Hello. On 12/17/2013 08:54 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: The two proposed patches here are extremely low risk, don't actually change the compiled code in any way like some of those did, and fix real compiler warnings. Considering the fact that IDE is about to be deleted (unless something embedded still wants it which I hardly doubt You're right in your doubting: there are quite a lot of drivers used by embedded platforms that nobody has bothered to convert to libata thus far. MBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 08:44:03AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > The two proposed patches here are extremely low risk, don't actually > change the compiled code in any way like some of those did, and fix > real compiler warnings. Considering the fact that IDE is about to be deleted (unless something embedded still wants it which I hardly doubt but hey, I'm always open to surprises), putting *any* work into that is a complete waste of time, IMO. But it is your time so I certainly won't tell you how to spend it. :-) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
Hello. On 12/17/2013 02:08 PM, Rashika Kheria wrote: Include appropriate header file ide-cd.h in ide-cd_verbose.c because function ide_cd_log_error() has its prototype declaration in ide-cd.h. Also, include linux/ide.h because it contains certain declarations necessary for including ide-cd.h. You should fix "ide-cd.h" if it depends on , not the .c file including it. This eliminates the following warnings in ide-cd_verbose.c: drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c:251:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ide_cd_log_error’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria WBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:19:21PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:38:16PM +0530, Rashika Kheria wrote: > > Include appropriate header file ide-cd.h in ide-cd_verbose.c because > > function ide_cd_log_error() has its prototype declaration in ide-cd.h. > > Also, include linux/ide.h because it contains certain declarations > > necessary for including ide-cd.h. > > > > This eliminates the following warnings in ide-cd_verbose.c: > > drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c:251:6: warning: no previous prototype for > > ‘ide_cd_log_error’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > drivers/ide/ is open only to fixes for serious, real bugs - nothing > else. I wouldn't waste my time with it if I were you. A quick check of "git log drivers/ide/" turns up a pile of fixes and cleanups; for instance: c2f7d1e ide: pmac: remove unnecessary pci_set_drvdata() a6fd6063 ide: cs5536: use module_pci_driver() 58e48be ide: pmac: Remove casting the return value which is a void pointer 64110c1 ide: sgiioc4: Staticize ioc4_ide_attach_one() 70ddce8 ide: palm_bk3710: add missing __iomem annotation The two proposed patches here are extremely low risk, don't actually change the compiled code in any way like some of those did, and fix real compiler warnings. - Josh Triplett -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:38:16PM +0530, Rashika Kheria wrote: > Include appropriate header file ide-cd.h in ide-cd_verbose.c because > function ide_cd_log_error() has its prototype declaration in ide-cd.h. > Also, include linux/ide.h because it contains certain declarations > necessary for including ide-cd.h. > > This eliminates the following warnings in ide-cd_verbose.c: > drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c:251:6: warning: no previous prototype for > ‘ide_cd_log_error’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett > drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c |2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c b/drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c > index 6490a2d..f079ca2 100644 > --- a/drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c > +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c > @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > +#include "ide-cd.h" > > #ifndef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECD_VERBOSE_ERRORS > void ide_cd_log_error(const char *name, struct request *failed_command, > -- > 1.7.9.5 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:38:16PM +0530, Rashika Kheria wrote: > Include appropriate header file ide-cd.h in ide-cd_verbose.c because > function ide_cd_log_error() has its prototype declaration in ide-cd.h. > Also, include linux/ide.h because it contains certain declarations > necessary for including ide-cd.h. > > This eliminates the following warnings in ide-cd_verbose.c: > drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c:251:6: warning: no previous prototype for > ‘ide_cd_log_error’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/ide/ is open only to fixes for serious, real bugs - nothing else. I wouldn't waste my time with it if I were you. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
Include appropriate header file ide-cd.h in ide-cd_verbose.c because function ide_cd_log_error() has its prototype declaration in ide-cd.h. Also, include linux/ide.h because it contains certain declarations necessary for including ide-cd.h. This eliminates the following warnings in ide-cd_verbose.c: drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c:251:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ide_cd_log_error’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria --- drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c |2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c b/drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c index 6490a2d..f079ca2 100644 --- a/drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include +#include "ide-cd.h" #ifndef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECD_VERBOSE_ERRORS void ide_cd_log_error(const char *name, struct request *failed_command, -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
Include appropriate header file ide-cd.h in ide-cd_verbose.c because function ide_cd_log_error() has its prototype declaration in ide-cd.h. Also, include linux/ide.h because it contains certain declarations necessary for including ide-cd.h. This eliminates the following warnings in ide-cd_verbose.c: drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c:251:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ide_cd_log_error’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria rashika.khe...@gmail.com --- drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c |2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c b/drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c index 6490a2d..f079ca2 100644 --- a/drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ #include linux/kernel.h #include linux/blkdev.h #include linux/cdrom.h +#include linux/ide.h #include scsi/scsi.h +#include ide-cd.h #ifndef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECD_VERBOSE_ERRORS void ide_cd_log_error(const char *name, struct request *failed_command, -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:38:16PM +0530, Rashika Kheria wrote: Include appropriate header file ide-cd.h in ide-cd_verbose.c because function ide_cd_log_error() has its prototype declaration in ide-cd.h. Also, include linux/ide.h because it contains certain declarations necessary for including ide-cd.h. This eliminates the following warnings in ide-cd_verbose.c: drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c:251:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ide_cd_log_error’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/ide/ is open only to fixes for serious, real bugs - nothing else. I wouldn't waste my time with it if I were you. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:38:16PM +0530, Rashika Kheria wrote: Include appropriate header file ide-cd.h in ide-cd_verbose.c because function ide_cd_log_error() has its prototype declaration in ide-cd.h. Also, include linux/ide.h because it contains certain declarations necessary for including ide-cd.h. This eliminates the following warnings in ide-cd_verbose.c: drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c:251:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ide_cd_log_error’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria rashika.khe...@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c |2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c b/drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c index 6490a2d..f079ca2 100644 --- a/drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ #include linux/kernel.h #include linux/blkdev.h #include linux/cdrom.h +#include linux/ide.h #include scsi/scsi.h +#include ide-cd.h #ifndef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECD_VERBOSE_ERRORS void ide_cd_log_error(const char *name, struct request *failed_command, -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:19:21PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:38:16PM +0530, Rashika Kheria wrote: Include appropriate header file ide-cd.h in ide-cd_verbose.c because function ide_cd_log_error() has its prototype declaration in ide-cd.h. Also, include linux/ide.h because it contains certain declarations necessary for including ide-cd.h. This eliminates the following warnings in ide-cd_verbose.c: drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c:251:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ide_cd_log_error’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/ide/ is open only to fixes for serious, real bugs - nothing else. I wouldn't waste my time with it if I were you. A quick check of git log drivers/ide/ turns up a pile of fixes and cleanups; for instance: c2f7d1e ide: pmac: remove unnecessary pci_set_drvdata() a6fd6063 ide: cs5536: use module_pci_driver() 58e48be ide: pmac: Remove casting the return value which is a void pointer 64110c1 ide: sgiioc4: Staticize ioc4_ide_attach_one() 70ddce8 ide: palm_bk3710: add missing __iomem annotation The two proposed patches here are extremely low risk, don't actually change the compiled code in any way like some of those did, and fix real compiler warnings. - Josh Triplett -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
Hello. On 12/17/2013 02:08 PM, Rashika Kheria wrote: Include appropriate header file ide-cd.h in ide-cd_verbose.c because function ide_cd_log_error() has its prototype declaration in ide-cd.h. Also, include linux/ide.h because it contains certain declarations necessary for including ide-cd.h. You should fix ide-cd.h if it depends on linux/ide.h, not the .c file including it. This eliminates the following warnings in ide-cd_verbose.c: drivers/ide/ide-cd_verbose.c:251:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ide_cd_log_error’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria rashika.khe...@gmail.com WBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 08:44:03AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: The two proposed patches here are extremely low risk, don't actually change the compiled code in any way like some of those did, and fix real compiler warnings. Considering the fact that IDE is about to be deleted (unless something embedded still wants it which I hardly doubt but hey, I'm always open to surprises), putting *any* work into that is a complete waste of time, IMO. But it is your time so I certainly won't tell you how to spend it. :-) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
Hello. On 12/17/2013 08:54 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: The two proposed patches here are extremely low risk, don't actually change the compiled code in any way like some of those did, and fix real compiler warnings. Considering the fact that IDE is about to be deleted (unless something embedded still wants it which I hardly doubt You're right in your doubting: there are quite a lot of drivers used by embedded platforms that nobody has bothered to convert to libata thus far. MBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: ide: Include appropriate header file in ide-cd_verbose.c
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:42:54PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: You're right in your doubting: there are quite a lot of drivers used by embedded platforms that nobody has bothered to convert to libata thus far. Hold on, what does that mean? IDE is back from the dead and used only for embedded stuff? Or we force people to convert drivers to libata by *deleting* ide? :-) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
