Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> writes: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 03:06:38PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: >> I was trying to figure out if it was permissible to merge the Mesa >> side of V3D's CSD support yet while it's in drm-misc-next but not >> drm-next, and developers on #dri-devel IRC had differing opinions of >> what the requirement was. >> >> v2: Restrict to just drm-next or drm-misc-next on airlied's request. > > Personally I think that's a bit too strict (if people want to screw up, > they will be able to anyway). But since I'm all for clearer rules where > possible, this has my support too. > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
Pushed to drm-misc-next now.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
