[PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
This patch adds support for the WM8750 (ARMv6) and WM8850 (ARMv7).
Common features across all SoCs are split into ARCH_VT8500 and
unique features are specified by each SoC option.
Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt |8 ++
arch/arm/Kconfig | 17 +++
arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig | 33 --
arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c|2 ++
4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt
index d657832..87dc1dd 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt
@@ -12,3 +12,11 @@ compatible = "wm,wm8505";
Boards with the Wondermedia WM8650 SoC shall have the following properties:
Required root node property:
compatible = "wm,wm8650";
+
+Boards with the Wondermedia WM8750 SoC shall have the following properties:
+Required root node property:
+compatible = "wm,wm8750";
+
+Boards with the Wondermedia WM8850 SoC shall have the following properties:
+Required root node property:
+compatible = "wm,wm8850";
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index f95ba14..fbb9492 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -952,20 +952,25 @@ config ARCH_OMAP
config ARCH_VT8500_SINGLE
bool "VIA/WonderMedia 85xx"
- select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
- select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
- select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
+ select ARCH_VT8500
select COMMON_CLK
select CPU_ARM926T
- select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
- select GENERIC_GPIO
- select HAVE_CLK
select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
select SPARSE_IRQ
select USE_OF
help
Support for VIA/WonderMedia VT8500/WM85xx System-on-Chip.
+config ARCH_WM8750_SINGLE
+ bool "WonderMedia WM8750/WM8850"
+ select ARCH_VT8500
+ select COMMON_CLK
+ select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
+ select SPARSE_IRQ
+ select USE_OF
+ help
+ Support for WonderMedia WM8750/WM8850 System-on-Chip.
+
endchoice
menu "Multiple platform selection"
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig
index 2ed0b7d..d67c7fa 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig
@@ -1,12 +1,39 @@
config ARCH_VT8500
- bool "VIA/WonderMedia 85xx" if ARCH_MULTI_V5
- default ARCH_VT8500_SINGLE
+ bool
select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
- select CPU_ARM926T
select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
select GENERIC_GPIO
select HAVE_CLK
+
+config ARCH_WM8505
+ bool "VIA/WonderMedia 85xx" if !ARCH_VT8500_SINGLE
+ depends on ARCH_MULTI_V5
+ default ARCH_VT8500_SINGLE
+ select ARCH_VT8500
+ select CPU_ARM926T
help
Support for VIA/WonderMedia VT8500/WM85xx System-on-Chip.
+
+config ARCH_WM8750
+ bool "WonderMedia WM8750"
+ depends on ARCH_MULTI_V6 || ARCH_WM8750_SINGLE
+ select ARCH_VT8500
+ select CPU_V6
+ help
+ Support for WonderMedia WM8750 System-on-Chip.
+
+config ARCH_WM8850
+ bool "WonderMedia WM8850"
+ depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7 || ARCH_WM8750_SINGLE
+ select ARCH_VT8500
+ select CPU_V7
+ help
+ Support for WonderMedia WM8850 System-on-Chip.
+
+# ensure that ARCH_WM8850 is on if ARCH_WM8750 is off
+config ARCH_WM8850_AUTO
+ def_bool y
+ depends on ARCH_WM8750_SINGLE && !ARCH_WM8750
+ select ARCH_WM8850
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
index 3c66d48..55162ab 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
@@ -183,6 +183,8 @@ static const char * const vt8500_dt_compat[] = {
"via,vt8500",
"wm,wm8650",
"wm,wm8505",
+ "wm,wm8750",
+ "wm,wm8850",
};
DT_MACHINE_START(WMT_DT, "VIA/Wondermedia SoC (Device Tree Support)")
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
This patch adds support for the WM8750 (ARMv6) and WM8850 (ARMv7).
Common features across all SoCs are split into ARCH_VT8500 and
unique features are specified by each SoC option.
Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk li...@prisktech.co.nz
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt |8 ++
arch/arm/Kconfig | 17 +++
arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig | 33 --
arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c|2 ++
4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt
index d657832..87dc1dd 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt
@@ -12,3 +12,11 @@ compatible = wm,wm8505;
Boards with the Wondermedia WM8650 SoC shall have the following properties:
Required root node property:
compatible = wm,wm8650;
+
+Boards with the Wondermedia WM8750 SoC shall have the following properties:
+Required root node property:
+compatible = wm,wm8750;
+
+Boards with the Wondermedia WM8850 SoC shall have the following properties:
+Required root node property:
+compatible = wm,wm8850;
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index f95ba14..fbb9492 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -952,20 +952,25 @@ config ARCH_OMAP
config ARCH_VT8500_SINGLE
bool VIA/WonderMedia 85xx
- select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
- select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
- select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
+ select ARCH_VT8500
select COMMON_CLK
select CPU_ARM926T
- select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
- select GENERIC_GPIO
- select HAVE_CLK
select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
select SPARSE_IRQ
select USE_OF
help
Support for VIA/WonderMedia VT8500/WM85xx System-on-Chip.
+config ARCH_WM8750_SINGLE
+ bool WonderMedia WM8750/WM8850
+ select ARCH_VT8500
+ select COMMON_CLK
+ select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
+ select SPARSE_IRQ
+ select USE_OF
+ help
+ Support for WonderMedia WM8750/WM8850 System-on-Chip.
+
endchoice
menu Multiple platform selection
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig
index 2ed0b7d..d67c7fa 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig
@@ -1,12 +1,39 @@
config ARCH_VT8500
- bool VIA/WonderMedia 85xx if ARCH_MULTI_V5
- default ARCH_VT8500_SINGLE
+ bool
select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
- select CPU_ARM926T
select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
select GENERIC_GPIO
select HAVE_CLK
+
+config ARCH_WM8505
+ bool VIA/WonderMedia 85xx if !ARCH_VT8500_SINGLE
+ depends on ARCH_MULTI_V5
+ default ARCH_VT8500_SINGLE
+ select ARCH_VT8500
+ select CPU_ARM926T
help
Support for VIA/WonderMedia VT8500/WM85xx System-on-Chip.
+
+config ARCH_WM8750
+ bool WonderMedia WM8750
+ depends on ARCH_MULTI_V6 || ARCH_WM8750_SINGLE
+ select ARCH_VT8500
+ select CPU_V6
+ help
+ Support for WonderMedia WM8750 System-on-Chip.
+
+config ARCH_WM8850
+ bool WonderMedia WM8850
+ depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7 || ARCH_WM8750_SINGLE
+ select ARCH_VT8500
+ select CPU_V7
+ help
+ Support for WonderMedia WM8850 System-on-Chip.
+
+# ensure that ARCH_WM8850 is on if ARCH_WM8750 is off
+config ARCH_WM8850_AUTO
+ def_bool y
+ depends on ARCH_WM8750_SINGLE !ARCH_WM8750
+ select ARCH_WM8850
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
index 3c66d48..55162ab 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
@@ -183,6 +183,8 @@ static const char * const vt8500_dt_compat[] = {
via,vt8500,
wm,wm8650,
wm,wm8505,
+ wm,wm8750,
+ wm,wm8850,
};
DT_MACHINE_START(WMT_DT, VIA/Wondermedia SoC (Device Tree Support))
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 10:21 +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 10 January 2013, Tony Prisk wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 21:27 +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > > Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already? > > > > This is what I thought - and the reason I haven't sent a pull-request > > for the patch's - I haven't had any Ack's :) > > > > Sorry, I think I misunderstood the question then. I meant that if > you received an Acked-by statement, it should be part of the > changeset comment by the time you send a pull request. > > There is also the rule that patches need to be reviewed on the > mailing list before you submit them for inclusion. Like all > rules, this can be bent a little for patches that are obvious > correct bug fixes, especially when you are the platform > maintainer. What you can do here is send the patches out to the > mailing list without any additional Acks and send the pull > request as the [PATCH 0/X] mail. We can then look at the > patches if necessary or just pull in the branch straight away. > > Arnd > > ___ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel All makes sense now - thanks. Regards Tony P -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
On Thursday 10 January 2013, Tony Prisk wrote: > On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 21:27 +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already? > > This is what I thought - and the reason I haven't sent a pull-request > for the patch's - I haven't had any Ack's :) > Sorry, I think I misunderstood the question then. I meant that if you received an Acked-by statement, it should be part of the changeset comment by the time you send a pull request. There is also the rule that patches need to be reviewed on the mailing list before you submit them for inclusion. Like all rules, this can be bent a little for patches that are obvious correct bug fixes, especially when you are the platform maintainer. What you can do here is send the patches out to the mailing list without any additional Acks and send the pull request as the [PATCH 0/X] mail. We can then look at the patches if necessary or just pull in the branch straight away. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 10:21 +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Thursday 10 January 2013, Tony Prisk wrote: On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 21:27 +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already? This is what I thought - and the reason I haven't sent a pull-request for the patch's - I haven't had any Ack's :) Sorry, I think I misunderstood the question then. I meant that if you received an Acked-by statement, it should be part of the changeset comment by the time you send a pull request. There is also the rule that patches need to be reviewed on the mailing list before you submit them for inclusion. Like all rules, this can be bent a little for patches that are obvious correct bug fixes, especially when you are the platform maintainer. What you can do here is send the patches out to the mailing list without any additional Acks and send the pull request as the [PATCH 0/X] mail. We can then look at the patches if necessary or just pull in the branch straight away. Arnd ___ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel All makes sense now - thanks. Regards Tony P -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
On Thursday 10 January 2013, Tony Prisk wrote: On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 21:27 +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already? This is what I thought - and the reason I haven't sent a pull-request for the patch's - I haven't had any Ack's :) Sorry, I think I misunderstood the question then. I meant that if you received an Acked-by statement, it should be part of the changeset comment by the time you send a pull request. There is also the rule that patches need to be reviewed on the mailing list before you submit them for inclusion. Like all rules, this can be bent a little for patches that are obvious correct bug fixes, especially when you are the platform maintainer. What you can do here is send the patches out to the mailing list without any additional Acks and send the pull request as the [PATCH 0/X] mail. We can then look at the patches if necessary or just pull in the branch straight away. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 21:27 +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 09 January 2013, Tony Prisk wrote: > > I'm quite happy to send a pull request if that's what you prefer. > > > > Generally people have just taken the patches straight from email, so > > everytime I've done a pull-request I get a reply back saying the patches > > have already been applied. > > > > Is there some 'rule' around pull-requests vs emailed patches? > > Generally, pull requests tend to be less work for us, so I prefer > them. In particular, when you add a tag description or a signed > tag, that gives automatically puts nice text into the merge > changeset. > > > Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already? > > Yes. > > Arnd This is what I thought - and the reason I haven't sent a pull-request for the patch's - I haven't had any Ack's :) Regards Tony P -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
On Wednesday 09 January 2013, Tony Prisk wrote: > I'm quite happy to send a pull request if that's what you prefer. > > Generally people have just taken the patches straight from email, so > everytime I've done a pull-request I get a reply back saying the patches > have already been applied. > > Is there some 'rule' around pull-requests vs emailed patches? Generally, pull requests tend to be less work for us, so I prefer them. In particular, when you add a tag description or a signed tag, that gives automatically puts nice text into the merge changeset. > Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already? Yes. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 22:30 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Tony Prisk wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 12:20 +1300, Tony Prisk wrote: > >> This patch adds support for the WM8750 (ARMv6) and WM8850 (ARMv7). > >> > >> Common features across all SoCs are split into ARCH_VT8500 and > >> unique features are specified by each SoC option. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk > > > > > > Hi Arnd, Olof, > > > > Haven't heard anything re: this patch series. Problem? > > Nope, just wasn't sure if you would send a git pull request or if you > wanted them applied. > > I'm out of time for tonight, but I'll look closer at them (and apply > them if all OK) tomorrow. > > > -Olof I'm quite happy to send a pull request if that's what you prefer. Generally people have just taken the patches straight from email, so everytime I've done a pull-request I get a reply back saying the patches have already been applied. Is there some 'rule' around pull-requests vs emailed patches? Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already? Regards Tony P -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 22:30 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Tony Prisk li...@prisktech.co.nz wrote: On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 12:20 +1300, Tony Prisk wrote: This patch adds support for the WM8750 (ARMv6) and WM8850 (ARMv7). Common features across all SoCs are split into ARCH_VT8500 and unique features are specified by each SoC option. Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk li...@prisktech.co.nz Hi Arnd, Olof, Haven't heard anything re: this patch series. Problem? Nope, just wasn't sure if you would send a git pull request or if you wanted them applied. I'm out of time for tonight, but I'll look closer at them (and apply them if all OK) tomorrow. -Olof I'm quite happy to send a pull request if that's what you prefer. Generally people have just taken the patches straight from email, so everytime I've done a pull-request I get a reply back saying the patches have already been applied. Is there some 'rule' around pull-requests vs emailed patches? Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already? Regards Tony P -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
On Wednesday 09 January 2013, Tony Prisk wrote: I'm quite happy to send a pull request if that's what you prefer. Generally people have just taken the patches straight from email, so everytime I've done a pull-request I get a reply back saying the patches have already been applied. Is there some 'rule' around pull-requests vs emailed patches? Generally, pull requests tend to be less work for us, so I prefer them. In particular, when you add a tag description or a signed tag, that gives automatically puts nice text into the merge changeset. Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already? Yes. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 21:27 +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Wednesday 09 January 2013, Tony Prisk wrote: I'm quite happy to send a pull request if that's what you prefer. Generally people have just taken the patches straight from email, so everytime I've done a pull-request I get a reply back saying the patches have already been applied. Is there some 'rule' around pull-requests vs emailed patches? Generally, pull requests tend to be less work for us, so I prefer them. In particular, when you add a tag description or a signed tag, that gives automatically puts nice text into the merge changeset. Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already? Yes. Arnd This is what I thought - and the reason I haven't sent a pull-request for the patch's - I haven't had any Ack's :) Regards Tony P -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Tony Prisk wrote: > On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 12:20 +1300, Tony Prisk wrote: >> This patch adds support for the WM8750 (ARMv6) and WM8850 (ARMv7). >> >> Common features across all SoCs are split into ARCH_VT8500 and >> unique features are specified by each SoC option. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk > > > Hi Arnd, Olof, > > Haven't heard anything re: this patch series. Problem? Nope, just wasn't sure if you would send a git pull request or if you wanted them applied. I'm out of time for tonight, but I'll look closer at them (and apply them if all OK) tomorrow. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 12:20 +1300, Tony Prisk wrote: > This patch adds support for the WM8750 (ARMv6) and WM8850 (ARMv7). > > Common features across all SoCs are split into ARCH_VT8500 and > unique features are specified by each SoC option. > > Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk Hi Arnd, Olof, Haven't heard anything re: this patch series. Problem? Regards Tony P -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 12:20 +1300, Tony Prisk wrote: This patch adds support for the WM8750 (ARMv6) and WM8850 (ARMv7). Common features across all SoCs are split into ARCH_VT8500 and unique features are specified by each SoC option. Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk li...@prisktech.co.nz Hi Arnd, Olof, Haven't heard anything re: this patch series. Problem? Regards Tony P -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Tony Prisk li...@prisktech.co.nz wrote: On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 12:20 +1300, Tony Prisk wrote: This patch adds support for the WM8750 (ARMv6) and WM8850 (ARMv7). Common features across all SoCs are split into ARCH_VT8500 and unique features are specified by each SoC option. Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk li...@prisktech.co.nz Hi Arnd, Olof, Haven't heard anything re: this patch series. Problem? Nope, just wasn't sure if you would send a git pull request or if you wanted them applied. I'm out of time for tonight, but I'll look closer at them (and apply them if all OK) tomorrow. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
This patch adds support for the WM8750 (ARMv6) and WM8850 (ARMv7).
Common features across all SoCs are split into ARCH_VT8500 and
unique features are specified by each SoC option.
Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt |8 ++
arch/arm/Kconfig | 17 +++
arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig | 33 --
arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c|2 ++
4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt
index d657832..87dc1dd 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt
@@ -12,3 +12,11 @@ compatible = "wm,wm8505";
Boards with the Wondermedia WM8650 SoC shall have the following properties:
Required root node property:
compatible = "wm,wm8650";
+
+Boards with the Wondermedia WM8750 SoC shall have the following properties:
+Required root node property:
+compatible = "wm,wm8750";
+
+Boards with the Wondermedia WM8850 SoC shall have the following properties:
+Required root node property:
+compatible = "wm,wm8850";
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index f95ba14..fbb9492 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -952,20 +952,25 @@ config ARCH_OMAP
config ARCH_VT8500_SINGLE
bool "VIA/WonderMedia 85xx"
- select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
- select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
- select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
+ select ARCH_VT8500
select COMMON_CLK
select CPU_ARM926T
- select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
- select GENERIC_GPIO
- select HAVE_CLK
select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
select SPARSE_IRQ
select USE_OF
help
Support for VIA/WonderMedia VT8500/WM85xx System-on-Chip.
+config ARCH_WM8750_SINGLE
+ bool "WonderMedia WM8750/WM8850"
+ select ARCH_VT8500
+ select COMMON_CLK
+ select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
+ select SPARSE_IRQ
+ select USE_OF
+ help
+ Support for WonderMedia WM8750/WM8850 System-on-Chip.
+
endchoice
menu "Multiple platform selection"
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig
index 2ed0b7d..d67c7fa 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig
@@ -1,12 +1,39 @@
config ARCH_VT8500
- bool "VIA/WonderMedia 85xx" if ARCH_MULTI_V5
- default ARCH_VT8500_SINGLE
+ bool
select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
- select CPU_ARM926T
select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
select GENERIC_GPIO
select HAVE_CLK
+
+config ARCH_WM8505
+ bool "VIA/WonderMedia 85xx" if !ARCH_VT8500_SINGLE
+ depends on ARCH_MULTI_V5
+ default ARCH_VT8500_SINGLE
+ select ARCH_VT8500
+ select CPU_ARM926T
help
Support for VIA/WonderMedia VT8500/WM85xx System-on-Chip.
+
+config ARCH_WM8750
+ bool "WonderMedia WM8750"
+ depends on ARCH_MULTI_V6 || ARCH_WM8750_SINGLE
+ select ARCH_VT8500
+ select CPU_V6
+ help
+ Support for WonderMedia WM8750 System-on-Chip.
+
+config ARCH_WM8850
+ bool "WonderMedia WM8850"
+ depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7 || ARCH_WM8750_SINGLE
+ select ARCH_VT8500
+ select CPU_V7
+ help
+ Support for WonderMedia WM8850 System-on-Chip.
+
+# ensure that ARCH_WM8850 is on if ARCH_WM8750 is off
+config ARCH_WM8850_AUTO
+ def_bool y
+ depends on ARCH_WM8750_SINGLE && !ARCH_WM8750
+ select ARCH_WM8850
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
index 3c66d48..55162ab 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
@@ -183,6 +183,8 @@ static const char * const vt8500_dt_compat[] = {
"via,vt8500",
"wm,wm8650",
"wm,wm8505",
+ "wm,wm8750",
+ "wm,wm8850",
};
DT_MACHINE_START(WMT_DT, "VIA/Wondermedia SoC (Device Tree Support)")
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
This patch adds support for the WM8750 (ARMv6) and WM8850 (ARMv7).
Common features across all SoCs are split into ARCH_VT8500 and
unique features are specified by each SoC option.
Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk li...@prisktech.co.nz
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt |8 ++
arch/arm/Kconfig | 17 +++
arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig | 33 --
arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c|2 ++
4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt
index d657832..87dc1dd 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vt8500.txt
@@ -12,3 +12,11 @@ compatible = wm,wm8505;
Boards with the Wondermedia WM8650 SoC shall have the following properties:
Required root node property:
compatible = wm,wm8650;
+
+Boards with the Wondermedia WM8750 SoC shall have the following properties:
+Required root node property:
+compatible = wm,wm8750;
+
+Boards with the Wondermedia WM8850 SoC shall have the following properties:
+Required root node property:
+compatible = wm,wm8850;
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index f95ba14..fbb9492 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -952,20 +952,25 @@ config ARCH_OMAP
config ARCH_VT8500_SINGLE
bool VIA/WonderMedia 85xx
- select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
- select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
- select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
+ select ARCH_VT8500
select COMMON_CLK
select CPU_ARM926T
- select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
- select GENERIC_GPIO
- select HAVE_CLK
select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
select SPARSE_IRQ
select USE_OF
help
Support for VIA/WonderMedia VT8500/WM85xx System-on-Chip.
+config ARCH_WM8750_SINGLE
+ bool WonderMedia WM8750/WM8850
+ select ARCH_VT8500
+ select COMMON_CLK
+ select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
+ select SPARSE_IRQ
+ select USE_OF
+ help
+ Support for WonderMedia WM8750/WM8850 System-on-Chip.
+
endchoice
menu Multiple platform selection
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig
index 2ed0b7d..d67c7fa 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/Kconfig
@@ -1,12 +1,39 @@
config ARCH_VT8500
- bool VIA/WonderMedia 85xx if ARCH_MULTI_V5
- default ARCH_VT8500_SINGLE
+ bool
select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
- select CPU_ARM926T
select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
select GENERIC_GPIO
select HAVE_CLK
+
+config ARCH_WM8505
+ bool VIA/WonderMedia 85xx if !ARCH_VT8500_SINGLE
+ depends on ARCH_MULTI_V5
+ default ARCH_VT8500_SINGLE
+ select ARCH_VT8500
+ select CPU_ARM926T
help
Support for VIA/WonderMedia VT8500/WM85xx System-on-Chip.
+
+config ARCH_WM8750
+ bool WonderMedia WM8750
+ depends on ARCH_MULTI_V6 || ARCH_WM8750_SINGLE
+ select ARCH_VT8500
+ select CPU_V6
+ help
+ Support for WonderMedia WM8750 System-on-Chip.
+
+config ARCH_WM8850
+ bool WonderMedia WM8850
+ depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7 || ARCH_WM8750_SINGLE
+ select ARCH_VT8500
+ select CPU_V7
+ help
+ Support for WonderMedia WM8850 System-on-Chip.
+
+# ensure that ARCH_WM8850 is on if ARCH_WM8750 is off
+config ARCH_WM8850_AUTO
+ def_bool y
+ depends on ARCH_WM8750_SINGLE !ARCH_WM8750
+ select ARCH_WM8850
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
index 3c66d48..55162ab 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
@@ -183,6 +183,8 @@ static const char * const vt8500_dt_compat[] = {
via,vt8500,
wm,wm8650,
wm,wm8505,
+ wm,wm8750,
+ wm,wm8850,
};
DT_MACHINE_START(WMT_DT, VIA/Wondermedia SoC (Device Tree Support))
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
