Re: [PATCH 17/20] net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c: use LIST_HEAD instead of LIST_HEAD_INIT

2007-12-07 Thread David Miller
From: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri,  7 Dec 2007 00:09:43 +0800

> single list_head variable initialized with LIST_HEAD_INIT could almost
> always can be replaced with LIST_HEAD declaration, this shrinks the code
> and looks better.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH 17/20] net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c: use LIST_HEAD instead of LIST_HEAD_INIT

2007-12-07 Thread David Miller
From: Denis Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri,  7 Dec 2007 00:09:43 +0800

 single list_head variable initialized with LIST_HEAD_INIT could almost
 always can be replaced with LIST_HEAD declaration, this shrinks the code
 and looks better.
 
 Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH 17/20] net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c: use LIST_HEAD instead of LIST_HEAD_INIT

2007-12-06 Thread Denis Cheng
single list_head variable initialized with LIST_HEAD_INIT could almost
always can be replaced with LIST_HEAD declaration, this shrinks the code
and looks better.

Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c |2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index cf43c49..452d972 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -1657,7 +1657,7 @@ void xfrm_replay_advance(struct xfrm_state *x, __be32 
net_seq)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_replay_advance);
 
-static struct list_head xfrm_km_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(xfrm_km_list);
+static LIST_HEAD(xfrm_km_list);
 static DEFINE_RWLOCK(xfrm_km_lock);
 
 void km_policy_notify(struct xfrm_policy *xp, int dir, struct km_event *c)
-- 
1.5.3.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH 17/20] net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c: use LIST_HEAD instead of LIST_HEAD_INIT

2007-12-06 Thread Denis Cheng
single list_head variable initialized with LIST_HEAD_INIT could almost
always can be replaced with LIST_HEAD declaration, this shrinks the code
and looks better.

Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c |2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index cf43c49..452d972 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -1657,7 +1657,7 @@ void xfrm_replay_advance(struct xfrm_state *x, __be32 
net_seq)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_replay_advance);
 
-static struct list_head xfrm_km_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(xfrm_km_list);
+static LIST_HEAD(xfrm_km_list);
 static DEFINE_RWLOCK(xfrm_km_lock);
 
 void km_policy_notify(struct xfrm_policy *xp, int dir, struct km_event *c)
-- 
1.5.3.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/