Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling USB 3.0 phy for samsung-usbphy driver

2012-12-18 Thread Vivek Gautam 
CC: Doug Anderson.


On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Sylwester Nawrocki
 wrote:
> On 12/18/2012 04:39 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>
>> Adding base address information required for enabling
>> USB 3.0 DRD phy on exynos5250 SOC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi |3 ++-
>>   1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
>> index bbdb2c2..07b7477 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
>> @@ -316,7 +316,8 @@
>>
>> usbphy@1213 {
>> compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-usbphy";
>> -   reg =<0x1213 0x100>;
>> +   reg =<0x1213 0x100>,
>> +   <0x1210 0x100>;
>
>
> Doesn't this second memory region mean distinct PHY controller device ?
> Why separate usbphy node can't/shouldn't be created for it ?
>
>> samsung,usb-phyhandle =<_h0_h1_h2>;
>> samsung,enable-mask =<1>;
>> };
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc"
> in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Thanks & Regards
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling USB 3.0 phy for samsung-usbphy driver

2012-12-18 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki 

On 12/18/2012 04:39 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:

Adding base address information required for enabling
USB 3.0 DRD phy on exynos5250 SOC.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam
---
  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi |3 ++-
  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi 
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
index bbdb2c2..07b7477 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
@@ -316,7 +316,8 @@

usbphy@1213 {
compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-usbphy";
-   reg =<0x1213 0x100>;
+   reg =<0x1213 0x100>,
+   <0x1210 0x100>;


Doesn't this second memory region mean distinct PHY controller device ?
Why separate usbphy node can't/shouldn't be created for it ?


samsung,usb-phyhandle =<_h0_h1_h2>;
samsung,enable-mask =<1>;
};

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[PATCH 2/2] ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling USB 3.0 phy for samsung-usbphy driver

2012-12-18 Thread Vivek Gautam 
Adding base address information required for enabling
USB 3.0 DRD phy on exynos5250 SOC.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam 
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi |3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi 
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
index bbdb2c2..07b7477 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
@@ -316,7 +316,8 @@
 
usbphy@1213 {
compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-usbphy";
-   reg = <0x1213 0x100>;
+   reg = <0x1213 0x100>,
+ <0x1210 0x100>;
samsung,usb-phyhandle = <_h0 _h1 _h2>;
samsung,enable-mask = <1>;
};
-- 
1.7.6.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[PATCH 2/2] ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling USB 3.0 phy for samsung-usbphy driver

2012-12-18 Thread Vivek Gautam 
Adding base address information required for enabling
USB 3.0 DRD phy on exynos5250 SOC.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam gautam.vi...@samsung.com
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi |3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi 
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
index bbdb2c2..07b7477 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
@@ -316,7 +316,8 @@
 
usbphy@1213 {
compatible = samsung,exynos5250-usbphy;
-   reg = 0x1213 0x100;
+   reg = 0x1213 0x100,
+ 0x1210 0x100;
samsung,usb-phyhandle = phy_h0 phy_h1 phy_h2;
samsung,enable-mask = 1;
};
-- 
1.7.6.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling USB 3.0 phy for samsung-usbphy driver

2012-12-18 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki 

On 12/18/2012 04:39 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:

Adding base address information required for enabling
USB 3.0 DRD phy on exynos5250 SOC.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautamgautam.vi...@samsung.com
---
  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi |3 ++-
  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi 
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
index bbdb2c2..07b7477 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
@@ -316,7 +316,8 @@

usbphy@1213 {
compatible = samsung,exynos5250-usbphy;
-   reg =0x1213 0x100;
+   reg =0x1213 0x100,
+   0x1210 0x100;


Doesn't this second memory region mean distinct PHY controller device ?
Why separate usbphy node can't/shouldn't be created for it ?


samsung,usb-phyhandle =phy_h0phy_h1phy_h2;
samsung,enable-mask =1;
};

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling USB 3.0 phy for samsung-usbphy driver

2012-12-18 Thread Vivek Gautam 
CC: Doug Anderson.


On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Sylwester Nawrocki
sylvester.nawro...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 12/18/2012 04:39 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:

 Adding base address information required for enabling
 USB 3.0 DRD phy on exynos5250 SOC.

 Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautamgautam.vi...@samsung.com
 ---
   arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi |3 ++-
   1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

 diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
 b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
 index bbdb2c2..07b7477 100644
 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
 +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
 @@ -316,7 +316,8 @@

 usbphy@1213 {
 compatible = samsung,exynos5250-usbphy;
 -   reg =0x1213 0x100;
 +   reg =0x1213 0x100,
 +   0x1210 0x100;


 Doesn't this second memory region mean distinct PHY controller device ?
 Why separate usbphy node can't/shouldn't be created for it ?

 samsung,usb-phyhandle =phy_h0phy_h1phy_h2;
 samsung,enable-mask =1;
 };

 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc
 in
 the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Thanks  Regards
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/