Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: mediatek: Adjust mt8173 pinctrl kconfig
On Friday 13 March 2015 14:46:35 Yingjoe Chen wrote: > > which will let you turn on the options if COMPILE_TEST is set, but not > > let you turn them off when the drivers are required. > > Yes, this is preferred. Because we don't have MACH_MT8173, so it is > possible a ARM64 + ARCH_MEDIATEK system doesn't need PINCTRL_MT8173, so > we still need 2 slightly different logic. Is it OK if I do this? > Also add some comments so future SoCs can follow the correct template. > > # For ARMv7 SoCs > config PINCTRL_MT8135 > bool "Mediatek MT8135 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_MT8135 > default MACH_MT8135 > select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON > > # For ARMv8 SoCs > config PINCTRL_MT8173 > bool "Mediatek MT8173 pin control" > depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST > default ARM64 > select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON > Looks good with one modification: please make it default ARM64 && ARCH_MEDIATEK so the driver does not get turned on by default for ARM64 configurations that do not contain support for mediatek chips. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: mediatek: Adjust mt8173 pinctrl kconfig
Hi Arnd, Thanks for your suggestion. On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 21:36 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 06 March 2015 14:24:51 Yingjoe Chen wrote: > > Linus, > > This one make PINCTRL_MT8173 option user selectable and is based on > > mtk-staging in your tree. If you think this is OK, please applied or > > squash this into previous change. Thanks. > > The patch looks good in principle, just two small comments > > > -- > > To simplify the job for Linus here, please start the line above > with > > 8<-- > > (a stylized pair if scissors) > > which is the magic that git-am looks for. Will do next time. <...> > You have slightly different logic here: PINCTRL_MT8135 will > always be enabled when COMPILE_TEST is on, while PINCTRL_MT8173 > is enabled by default in this case, but can be turned off. > Neither of them is what you really want, which would be > > config PINCTRL_MT8135 > bool "Mediatek MT8135 pin control" > depends on MACH_MT8135 || COMPILE_TEST > default MACH_MT8135 > select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON > > config PINCTRL_MT8135 > bool "Mediatek MT8173 pin control" > depends on MACH_MT8173 || COMPILE_TEST > default MACH_MT8173 > select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON > > This way, the options are only enabled by default if MACH_MT8135 > or MACH_MT8173 are enabled, but you are free to enable or disable > them when COMPILE_TEST is set. Alternatively, you can do > > config PINCTRL_MT8135 > bool "Mediatek MT8135 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_MT8135 > default MACH_MT8135 > select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON > > config PINCTRL_MT8135 > bool "Mediatek MT8173 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_MT8173 > default MACH_MT8173 > select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON > > which will let you turn on the options if COMPILE_TEST is set, but not > let you turn them off when the drivers are required. Yes, this is preferred. Because we don't have MACH_MT8173, so it is possible a ARM64 + ARCH_MEDIATEK system doesn't need PINCTRL_MT8173, so we still need 2 slightly different logic. Is it OK if I do this? Also add some comments so future SoCs can follow the correct template. # For ARMv7 SoCs config PINCTRL_MT8135 bool "Mediatek MT8135 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_MT8135 default MACH_MT8135 select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON # For ARMv8 SoCs config PINCTRL_MT8173 bool "Mediatek MT8173 pin control" depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST default ARM64 select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON Joe.C -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: mediatek: Adjust mt8173 pinctrl kconfig
On Friday 06 March 2015 14:24:51 Yingjoe Chen wrote: > Linus, > This one make PINCTRL_MT8173 option user selectable and is based on > mtk-staging in your tree. If you think this is OK, please applied or > squash this into previous change. Thanks. The patch looks good in principle, just two small comments > -- To simplify the job for Linus here, please start the line above with 8<-- (a stylized pair if scissors) which is the magic that git-am looks for. > ARM64 maintainer doesn't want to add MACH_* for each SoC. > Adjust mt8173 pinctrl kconfig entry so user can manually select it. > > Also make PINCTRL_MT8135 build when COMPILE_TEST is enabled. > > Signed-off-by: Yingjoe Chen > --- > drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig | 8 +--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig > b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig > index 49b8649..1472f0e 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > -if ARCH_MEDIATEK > +if ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST > > config PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON > bool > @@ -8,11 +8,13 @@ config PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON > select OF_GPIO > > config PINCTRL_MT8135 > - def_bool MACH_MT8135 > + def_bool MACH_MT8135 || COMPILE_TEST > select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON > > config PINCTRL_MT8173 > - def_bool MACH_MT8173 > + bool "Mediatek MT8173 pin control" > + def_bool y > + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST > select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON > You have slightly different logic here: PINCTRL_MT8135 will always be enabled when COMPILE_TEST is on, while PINCTRL_MT8173 is enabled by default in this case, but can be turned off. Neither of them is what you really want, which would be config PINCTRL_MT8135 bool "Mediatek MT8135 pin control" depends on MACH_MT8135 || COMPILE_TEST default MACH_MT8135 select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON config PINCTRL_MT8135 bool "Mediatek MT8173 pin control" depends on MACH_MT8173 || COMPILE_TEST default MACH_MT8173 select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON This way, the options are only enabled by default if MACH_MT8135 or MACH_MT8173 are enabled, but you are free to enable or disable them when COMPILE_TEST is set. Alternatively, you can do config PINCTRL_MT8135 bool "Mediatek MT8135 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_MT8135 default MACH_MT8135 select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON config PINCTRL_MT8135 bool "Mediatek MT8173 pin control" if COMPILE_TEST && !MACH_MT8173 default MACH_MT8173 select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON which will let you turn on the options if COMPILE_TEST is set, but not let you turn them off when the drivers are required. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: mediatek: Adjust mt8173 pinctrl kconfig
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 12:05 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 14:24 +0800, Yingjoe Chen wrote: > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig > > > @@ -8,11 +8,13 @@ config PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON > > select OF_GPIO > > > > config PINCTRL_MT8135 > > - def_bool MACH_MT8135 > > + def_bool MACH_MT8135 || COMPILE_TEST > > select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON > > > > config PINCTRL_MT8173 > > - def_bool MACH_MT8173 > > + bool "Mediatek MT8173 pin control" > > + def_bool y > > The kconfig tools will do what you mean here, but I think it's cleaner > to make this just: > bool "Mediatek MT8173 pin control" > default y > Hi Paul, Just sent a new version with this change. Thanks for your suggestion. Joe.C -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: mediatek: Adjust mt8173 pinctrl kconfig
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 14:24 +0800, Yingjoe Chen wrote: > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig > @@ -8,11 +8,13 @@ config PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON > select OF_GPIO > > config PINCTRL_MT8135 > - def_bool MACH_MT8135 > + def_bool MACH_MT8135 || COMPILE_TEST > select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON > > config PINCTRL_MT8173 > - def_bool MACH_MT8173 > + bool "Mediatek MT8173 pin control" > + def_bool y The kconfig tools will do what you mean here, but I think it's cleaner to make this just: bool "Mediatek MT8173 pin control" default y > + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST > select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON > > endif Thanks, Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: mediatek: Adjust mt8173 pinctrl kconfig
Linus, This one make PINCTRL_MT8173 option user selectable and is based on mtk-staging in your tree. If you think this is OK, please applied or squash this into previous change. Thanks. -- ARM64 maintainer doesn't want to add MACH_* for each SoC. Adjust mt8173 pinctrl kconfig entry so user can manually select it. Also make PINCTRL_MT8135 build when COMPILE_TEST is enabled. Signed-off-by: Yingjoe Chen --- drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig | 8 +--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig index 49b8649..1472f0e 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/Kconfig @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -if ARCH_MEDIATEK +if ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST config PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON bool @@ -8,11 +8,13 @@ config PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON select OF_GPIO config PINCTRL_MT8135 - def_bool MACH_MT8135 + def_bool MACH_MT8135 || COMPILE_TEST select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON config PINCTRL_MT8173 - def_bool MACH_MT8173 + bool "Mediatek MT8173 pin control" + def_bool y + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST select PINCTRL_MTK_COMMON endif -- 1.8.1.1.dirty -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
