Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency
On Wed 02 Nov 12:24 PDT 2016, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote: > On 11/01/2016 04:11 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >On 10/28, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote: > >>@@ -380,33 +384,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_is_available); > >> static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> { > >>struct qcom_scm *scm; > >>+ uint64_t clks; > >>int ret; > >> > >>scm = devm_kzalloc(>dev, sizeof(*scm), GFP_KERNEL); > >>if (!scm) > >>return -ENOMEM; > >> > >>- scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "core"); > >>- if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) { > >>- if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) > >>- return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk); > >>+ clks = (uint64_t)of_device_get_match_data(>dev); > >>+ if (clks & SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK) { > >>+ scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "core"); > >>+ if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) { > >>+ if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) > >>+ return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk); > >> > >>- scm->core_clk = NULL; > >>+ scm->core_clk = NULL; > >>+ } > >>} > >> > >>if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,scm")) { > > > >Why didn't this also get added to the flags feature? I'd prefer > >we either use of_device_is_compatible() for everything, or device > >data to figure out what quirks to apply. > > You're right. These flags are already added for "qcom,scm" compatible. We > can modify this to honor data flags only. I hope it's okay to update it in > the same patch? > Yes, you're replacing the old conditional with a set of new ones, so it should go in this patch. Regards, Bjorn
Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency
On Wed 02 Nov 12:24 PDT 2016, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote: > On 11/01/2016 04:11 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >On 10/28, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote: > >>@@ -380,33 +384,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_is_available); > >> static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> { > >>struct qcom_scm *scm; > >>+ uint64_t clks; > >>int ret; > >> > >>scm = devm_kzalloc(>dev, sizeof(*scm), GFP_KERNEL); > >>if (!scm) > >>return -ENOMEM; > >> > >>- scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "core"); > >>- if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) { > >>- if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) > >>- return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk); > >>+ clks = (uint64_t)of_device_get_match_data(>dev); > >>+ if (clks & SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK) { > >>+ scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "core"); > >>+ if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) { > >>+ if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) > >>+ return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk); > >> > >>- scm->core_clk = NULL; > >>+ scm->core_clk = NULL; > >>+ } > >>} > >> > >>if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,scm")) { > > > >Why didn't this also get added to the flags feature? I'd prefer > >we either use of_device_is_compatible() for everything, or device > >data to figure out what quirks to apply. > > You're right. These flags are already added for "qcom,scm" compatible. We > can modify this to honor data flags only. I hope it's okay to update it in > the same patch? > Yes, you're replacing the old conditional with a set of new ones, so it should go in this patch. Regards, Bjorn
Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency
On 11/01/2016 04:11 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 10/28, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote: @@ -380,33 +384,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_is_available); static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct qcom_scm *scm; + uint64_t clks; int ret; scm = devm_kzalloc(>dev, sizeof(*scm), GFP_KERNEL); if (!scm) return -ENOMEM; - scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "core"); - if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) { - if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) - return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk); + clks = (uint64_t)of_device_get_match_data(>dev); + if (clks & SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK) { + scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "core"); + if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) { + if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) + return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk); - scm->core_clk = NULL; + scm->core_clk = NULL; + } } if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,scm")) { Why didn't this also get added to the flags feature? I'd prefer we either use of_device_is_compatible() for everything, or device data to figure out what quirks to apply. You're right. These flags are already added for "qcom,scm" compatible. We can modify this to honor data flags only. I hope it's okay to update it in the same patch? Regards, Sarang - scm->iface_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "iface"); - if (IS_ERR(scm->iface_clk)) { - if (PTR_ERR(scm->iface_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER) -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency
On 11/01/2016 04:11 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 10/28, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote: @@ -380,33 +384,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_is_available); static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct qcom_scm *scm; + uint64_t clks; int ret; scm = devm_kzalloc(>dev, sizeof(*scm), GFP_KERNEL); if (!scm) return -ENOMEM; - scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "core"); - if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) { - if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) - return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk); + clks = (uint64_t)of_device_get_match_data(>dev); + if (clks & SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK) { + scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "core"); + if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) { + if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) + return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk); - scm->core_clk = NULL; + scm->core_clk = NULL; + } } if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,scm")) { Why didn't this also get added to the flags feature? I'd prefer we either use of_device_is_compatible() for everything, or device data to figure out what quirks to apply. You're right. These flags are already added for "qcom,scm" compatible. We can modify this to honor data flags only. I hope it's okay to update it in the same patch? Regards, Sarang - scm->iface_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "iface"); - if (IS_ERR(scm->iface_clk)) { - if (PTR_ERR(scm->iface_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER) -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency
On 10/28, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote: > @@ -380,33 +384,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_is_available); > static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct qcom_scm *scm; > + uint64_t clks; > int ret; > > scm = devm_kzalloc(>dev, sizeof(*scm), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!scm) > return -ENOMEM; > > - scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "core"); > - if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) { > - if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) > - return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk); > + clks = (uint64_t)of_device_get_match_data(>dev); > + if (clks & SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK) { > + scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "core"); > + if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) { > + if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) > + return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk); > > - scm->core_clk = NULL; > + scm->core_clk = NULL; > + } > } > > if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,scm")) { Why didn't this also get added to the flags feature? I'd prefer we either use of_device_is_compatible() for everything, or device data to figure out what quirks to apply. > - scm->iface_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "iface"); > - if (IS_ERR(scm->iface_clk)) { > - if (PTR_ERR(scm->iface_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER) -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency
On 10/28, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote: > @@ -380,33 +384,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_is_available); > static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct qcom_scm *scm; > + uint64_t clks; > int ret; > > scm = devm_kzalloc(>dev, sizeof(*scm), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!scm) > return -ENOMEM; > > - scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "core"); > - if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) { > - if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) > - return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk); > + clks = (uint64_t)of_device_get_match_data(>dev); > + if (clks & SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK) { > + scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "core"); > + if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) { > + if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) > + return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk); > > - scm->core_clk = NULL; > + scm->core_clk = NULL; > + } > } > > if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,scm")) { Why didn't this also get added to the flags feature? I'd prefer we either use of_device_is_compatible() for everything, or device data to figure out what quirks to apply. > - scm->iface_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "iface"); > - if (IS_ERR(scm->iface_clk)) { > - if (PTR_ERR(scm->iface_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER) -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency
Hi Sarangdhar, [auto build test WARNING on linus/master] [also build test WARNING on v4.9-rc2 next-20161028] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was built on] [Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Sarangdhar-Joshi/Remove-clocks-dependency-from-SCM-driver/20161029-081333 config: arm-allmodconfig (attached as .config) compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705 reproduce: wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # save the attached .config to linux build tree make.cross ARCH=arm All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c: In function 'qcom_scm_probe': >> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c:337:9: warning: cast from pointer to integer of >> different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast] clks = (uint64_t)of_device_get_match_data(>dev); ^ vim +337 drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c 321 bool qcom_scm_is_available(void) 322 { 323 return !!__scm; 324 } 325 EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_is_available); 326 327 static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) 328 { 329 struct qcom_scm *scm; 330 uint64_t clks; 331 int ret; 332 333 scm = devm_kzalloc(>dev, sizeof(*scm), GFP_KERNEL); 334 if (!scm) 335 return -ENOMEM; 336 > 337 clks = (uint64_t)of_device_get_match_data(>dev); 338 if (clks & SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK) { 339 scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "core"); 340 if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) { 341 if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) 342 return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk); 343 344 scm->core_clk = NULL; 345 } --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructureOpen Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation .config.gz Description: application/gzip
Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency
Hi Sarangdhar, [auto build test WARNING on linus/master] [also build test WARNING on v4.9-rc2 next-20161028] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base= (or --base=auto for convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was built on] [Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Sarangdhar-Joshi/Remove-clocks-dependency-from-SCM-driver/20161029-081333 config: arm-allmodconfig (attached as .config) compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705 reproduce: wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # save the attached .config to linux build tree make.cross ARCH=arm All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c: In function 'qcom_scm_probe': >> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c:337:9: warning: cast from pointer to integer of >> different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast] clks = (uint64_t)of_device_get_match_data(>dev); ^ vim +337 drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c 321 bool qcom_scm_is_available(void) 322 { 323 return !!__scm; 324 } 325 EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_is_available); 326 327 static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) 328 { 329 struct qcom_scm *scm; 330 uint64_t clks; 331 int ret; 332 333 scm = devm_kzalloc(>dev, sizeof(*scm), GFP_KERNEL); 334 if (!scm) 335 return -ENOMEM; 336 > 337 clks = (uint64_t)of_device_get_match_data(>dev); 338 if (clks & SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK) { 339 scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "core"); 340 if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) { 341 if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) 342 return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk); 343 344 scm->core_clk = NULL; 345 } --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructureOpen Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation .config.gz Description: application/gzip
[PATCH 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency
Core, iface and bus clocks are not required to be voted from SCM driver for some of the Qualcomm chipsets. Remove dependency on these clocks from driver. Suggested-by: Bjorn AnderssonSigned-off-by: Sarangdhar Joshi --- drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 65 - 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c index d79fecd..010a350 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@ #include "qcom_scm.h" +#define SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK BIT(0) +#define SCM_HAS_IFACE_CLK BIT(1) +#define SCM_HAS_BUS_CLKBIT(2) + struct qcom_scm { struct device *dev; struct clk *core_clk; @@ -380,33 +384,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_is_available); static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct qcom_scm *scm; + uint64_t clks; int ret; scm = devm_kzalloc(>dev, sizeof(*scm), GFP_KERNEL); if (!scm) return -ENOMEM; - scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "core"); - if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) { - if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) - return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk); + clks = (uint64_t)of_device_get_match_data(>dev); + if (clks & SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK) { + scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "core"); + if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) { + if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) + return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk); - scm->core_clk = NULL; + scm->core_clk = NULL; + } } if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,scm")) { - scm->iface_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "iface"); - if (IS_ERR(scm->iface_clk)) { - if (PTR_ERR(scm->iface_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER) - dev_err(>dev, "failed to acquire iface clk\n"); - return PTR_ERR(scm->iface_clk); + if (clks & SCM_HAS_IFACE_CLK) { + scm->iface_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "iface"); + if (IS_ERR(scm->iface_clk)) { + if (PTR_ERR(scm->iface_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER) + dev_err(>dev, + "failed to acquire iface clk\n"); + return PTR_ERR(scm->iface_clk); + } } - scm->bus_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "bus"); - if (IS_ERR(scm->bus_clk)) { - if (PTR_ERR(scm->bus_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER) - dev_err(>dev, "failed to acquire bus clk\n"); - return PTR_ERR(scm->bus_clk); + if (clks & SCM_HAS_BUS_CLK) { + scm->bus_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "bus"); + if (IS_ERR(scm->bus_clk)) { + if (PTR_ERR(scm->bus_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER) + dev_err(>dev, + "failed to acquire bus clk\n"); + return PTR_ERR(scm->bus_clk); + } } } @@ -429,10 +443,23 @@ static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } static const struct of_device_id qcom_scm_dt_match[] = { - { .compatible = "qcom,scm-apq8064",}, - { .compatible = "qcom,scm-msm8660",}, - { .compatible = "qcom,scm-msm8960",}, - { .compatible = "qcom,scm",}, + { .compatible = "qcom,scm-apq8064", + .data = (void *) SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK, + }, + { .compatible = "qcom,scm-msm8660", + .data = (void *) SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK, + }, + { .compatible = "qcom,scm-msm8960", + .data = (void *) SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK, + }, + { .compatible = "qcom,scm-msm8996", + .data = NULL, /* no clocks */ + }, + { .compatible = "qcom,scm", + .data = (void *) ( SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK + | SCM_HAS_IFACE_CLK + | SCM_HAS_BUS_CLK ), + }, {} }; -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
[PATCH 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Remove core, iface and bus clocks dependency
Core, iface and bus clocks are not required to be voted from SCM driver for some of the Qualcomm chipsets. Remove dependency on these clocks from driver. Suggested-by: Bjorn Andersson Signed-off-by: Sarangdhar Joshi --- drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 65 - 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c index d79fecd..010a350 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@ #include "qcom_scm.h" +#define SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK BIT(0) +#define SCM_HAS_IFACE_CLK BIT(1) +#define SCM_HAS_BUS_CLKBIT(2) + struct qcom_scm { struct device *dev; struct clk *core_clk; @@ -380,33 +384,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_is_available); static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct qcom_scm *scm; + uint64_t clks; int ret; scm = devm_kzalloc(>dev, sizeof(*scm), GFP_KERNEL); if (!scm) return -ENOMEM; - scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "core"); - if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) { - if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) - return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk); + clks = (uint64_t)of_device_get_match_data(>dev); + if (clks & SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK) { + scm->core_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "core"); + if (IS_ERR(scm->core_clk)) { + if (PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) + return PTR_ERR(scm->core_clk); - scm->core_clk = NULL; + scm->core_clk = NULL; + } } if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,scm")) { - scm->iface_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "iface"); - if (IS_ERR(scm->iface_clk)) { - if (PTR_ERR(scm->iface_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER) - dev_err(>dev, "failed to acquire iface clk\n"); - return PTR_ERR(scm->iface_clk); + if (clks & SCM_HAS_IFACE_CLK) { + scm->iface_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "iface"); + if (IS_ERR(scm->iface_clk)) { + if (PTR_ERR(scm->iface_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER) + dev_err(>dev, + "failed to acquire iface clk\n"); + return PTR_ERR(scm->iface_clk); + } } - scm->bus_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "bus"); - if (IS_ERR(scm->bus_clk)) { - if (PTR_ERR(scm->bus_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER) - dev_err(>dev, "failed to acquire bus clk\n"); - return PTR_ERR(scm->bus_clk); + if (clks & SCM_HAS_BUS_CLK) { + scm->bus_clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "bus"); + if (IS_ERR(scm->bus_clk)) { + if (PTR_ERR(scm->bus_clk) != -EPROBE_DEFER) + dev_err(>dev, + "failed to acquire bus clk\n"); + return PTR_ERR(scm->bus_clk); + } } } @@ -429,10 +443,23 @@ static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } static const struct of_device_id qcom_scm_dt_match[] = { - { .compatible = "qcom,scm-apq8064",}, - { .compatible = "qcom,scm-msm8660",}, - { .compatible = "qcom,scm-msm8960",}, - { .compatible = "qcom,scm",}, + { .compatible = "qcom,scm-apq8064", + .data = (void *) SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK, + }, + { .compatible = "qcom,scm-msm8660", + .data = (void *) SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK, + }, + { .compatible = "qcom,scm-msm8960", + .data = (void *) SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK, + }, + { .compatible = "qcom,scm-msm8996", + .data = NULL, /* no clocks */ + }, + { .compatible = "qcom,scm", + .data = (void *) ( SCM_HAS_CORE_CLK + | SCM_HAS_IFACE_CLK + | SCM_HAS_BUS_CLK ), + }, {} }; -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project