On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 12:18:33 +0300
Stefan Popa wrote:
> One in two sample sets was lost by multiplying fifo_set_size with
> sizeof(u16). Also, the double number of available samples were pushed to
> the iio buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Popa
Looks right to me. Will pick up once we've resolved the questions
on patch 1.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c
> index adec37b..72d3f45 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c
> @@ -548,8 +548,7 @@ static irqreturn_t adxl372_trigger_handler(int irq, void
> *p)
> goto err;
>
> /* Each sample is 2 bytes */
> - for (i = 0; i < fifo_entries * sizeof(u16);
> - i += st->fifo_set_size * sizeof(u16))
> + for (i = 0; i < fifo_entries; i += st->fifo_set_size)
> iio_push_to_buffers(indio_dev, >fifo_buf[i]);
> }
> err:
