Re: [PATCH 2/6] net: dsa: allow switch drivers to cleanup their resources

[Neil Armstrong]

On 10/27/2015 05:59 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> On Oct. Tuesday 27 (44) 04:43 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I didn't know how to handle this since it was part of a larger patch.
>>
>> I forgot to add this into the cover-letter but I wanted to send an RFC serie 
>> with
>> your bcm remove patch and a mv88e6xxx remove experimental code.
>>
>> Yet, the mv88e6060 does not make usage of this.
> 
> So this patch must be part of your RFC for module removal instead of
> this patchset.
> 
> Thanks,
> -v
> 

Vivien, Florian,

Thanks for the review, I will integrate it in the other RFC patchset with the 
correct Signed-off-by tag.

Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 2/6] net: dsa: allow switch drivers to cleanup their resources

[Neil Armstrong]

On 10/27/2015 05:59 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> On Oct. Tuesday 27 (44) 04:43 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I didn't know how to handle this since it was part of a larger patch.
>>
>> I forgot to add this into the cover-letter but I wanted to send an RFC serie 
>> with
>> your bcm remove patch and a mv88e6xxx remove experimental code.
>>
>> Yet, the mv88e6060 does not make usage of this.
> 
> So this patch must be part of your RFC for module removal instead of
> this patchset.
> 
> Thanks,
> -v
> 

Vivien, Florian,

Thanks for the review, I will integrate it in the other RFC patchset with the 
correct Signed-off-by tag.

Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 2/6] net: dsa: allow switch drivers to cleanup their resources

[Vivien Didelot]

On Oct. Tuesday 27 (44) 04:43 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Hi,
> On 10/27/2015 04:39 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > On 27/10/15 07:48, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> >> Some switch drivers might request interrupts, remap register ranges,
> >> allow such drivers to implement a "remove" callback doing just that.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Florian Fainelli 
> > 
> > This should probably be a Signed-off-by tag, but there is nothing using
> > this, so you would want to introduce an user of this function in the
> > same patch series so we see how you intend to use it?
> > 
> >> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong 
> 
> Yes, I didn't know how to handle this since it was part of a larger patch.
> 
> I forgot to add this into the cover-letter but I wanted to send an RFC serie 
> with
> your bcm remove patch and a mv88e6xxx remove experimental code.
> 
> Yet, the mv88e6060 does not make usage of this.

So this patch must be part of your RFC for module removal instead of
this patchset.

Thanks,
-v
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 2/6] net: dsa: allow switch drivers to cleanup their resources

[Neil Armstrong]

Hi,
On 10/27/2015 04:39 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 27/10/15 07:48, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> Some switch drivers might request interrupts, remap register ranges,
>> allow such drivers to implement a "remove" callback doing just that.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Florian Fainelli 
> 
> This should probably be a Signed-off-by tag, but there is nothing using
> this, so you would want to introduce an user of this function in the
> same patch series so we see how you intend to use it?
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong 

Yes, I didn't know how to handle this since it was part of a larger patch.

I forgot to add this into the cover-letter but I wanted to send an RFC serie 
with
your bcm remove patch and a mv88e6xxx remove experimental code.

Yet, the mv88e6060 does not make usage of this.

Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 2/6] net: dsa: allow switch drivers to cleanup their resources

[Florian Fainelli]

On 27/10/15 07:48, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Some switch drivers might request interrupts, remap register ranges,
> allow such drivers to implement a "remove" callback doing just that.
> 
> Suggested-by: Florian Fainelli 

This should probably be a Signed-off-by tag, but there is nothing using
this, so you would want to introduce an user of this function in the
same patch series so we see how you intend to use it?

> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong 
> ---
>  include/net/dsa.h | 1 +
>  net/dsa/dsa.c | 4 
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
> index d4d13f7..725b11f 100644
> --- a/include/net/dsa.h
> +++ b/include/net/dsa.h
> @@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ struct dsa_switch_driver {
>*/
>   char*(*probe)(struct device *host_dev, int sw_addr);
>   int (*setup)(struct dsa_switch *ds);
> + void(*remove)(struct dsa_switch *ds);
>   int (*set_addr)(struct dsa_switch *ds, u8 *addr);
>   u32 (*get_phy_flags)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port);
> 
> diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> index aeb6a7c..7c9914b 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/dsa.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> @@ -459,6 +459,10 @@ static void dsa_switch_destroy(struct dsa_switch *ds)
>   }
> 
>   mdiobus_unregister(ds->slave_mii_bus);
> +
> + /* Leave a chance to the driver to cleanup */
> + if (ds->drv->remove)
> + ds->drv->remove(ds);
>  }
> 
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> 


-- 
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[PATCH 2/6] net: dsa: allow switch drivers to cleanup their resources

[Neil Armstrong]

Some switch drivers might request interrupts, remap register ranges,
allow such drivers to implement a "remove" callback doing just that.

Suggested-by: Florian Fainelli 
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong 
---
 include/net/dsa.h | 1 +
 net/dsa/dsa.c | 4 
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
index d4d13f7..725b11f 100644
--- a/include/net/dsa.h
+++ b/include/net/dsa.h
@@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ struct dsa_switch_driver {
 */
char*(*probe)(struct device *host_dev, int sw_addr);
int (*setup)(struct dsa_switch *ds);
+   void(*remove)(struct dsa_switch *ds);
int (*set_addr)(struct dsa_switch *ds, u8 *addr);
u32 (*get_phy_flags)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port);

diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c b/net/dsa/dsa.c
index aeb6a7c..7c9914b 100644
--- a/net/dsa/dsa.c
+++ b/net/dsa/dsa.c
@@ -459,6 +459,10 @@ static void dsa_switch_destroy(struct dsa_switch *ds)
}

mdiobus_unregister(ds->slave_mii_bus);
+
+   /* Leave a chance to the driver to cleanup */
+   if (ds->drv->remove)
+   ds->drv->remove(ds);
 }

 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
-- 
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[PATCH 2/6] net: dsa: allow switch drivers to cleanup their resources

[Neil Armstrong]

Some switch drivers might request interrupts, remap register ranges,
allow such drivers to implement a "remove" callback doing just that.

Suggested-by: Florian Fainelli 
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong 
---
 include/net/dsa.h | 1 +
 net/dsa/dsa.c | 4 
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
index d4d13f7..725b11f 100644
--- a/include/net/dsa.h
+++ b/include/net/dsa.h
@@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ struct dsa_switch_driver {
 */
char*(*probe)(struct device *host_dev, int sw_addr);
int (*setup)(struct dsa_switch *ds);
+   void(*remove)(struct dsa_switch *ds);
int (*set_addr)(struct dsa_switch *ds, u8 *addr);
u32 (*get_phy_flags)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port);

diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c b/net/dsa/dsa.c
index aeb6a7c..7c9914b 100644
--- a/net/dsa/dsa.c
+++ b/net/dsa/dsa.c
@@ -459,6 +459,10 @@ static void dsa_switch_destroy(struct dsa_switch *ds)
}

mdiobus_unregister(ds->slave_mii_bus);
+
+   /* Leave a chance to the driver to cleanup */
+   if (ds->drv->remove)
+   ds->drv->remove(ds);
 }

 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
-- 
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 2/6] net: dsa: allow switch drivers to cleanup their resources

[Florian Fainelli]

On 27/10/15 07:48, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Some switch drivers might request interrupts, remap register ranges,
> allow such drivers to implement a "remove" callback doing just that.
> 
> Suggested-by: Florian Fainelli 

This should probably be a Signed-off-by tag, but there is nothing using
this, so you would want to introduce an user of this function in the
same patch series so we see how you intend to use it?

> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong 
> ---
>  include/net/dsa.h | 1 +
>  net/dsa/dsa.c | 4 
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
> index d4d13f7..725b11f 100644
> --- a/include/net/dsa.h
> +++ b/include/net/dsa.h
> @@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ struct dsa_switch_driver {
>*/
>   char*(*probe)(struct device *host_dev, int sw_addr);
>   int (*setup)(struct dsa_switch *ds);
> + void(*remove)(struct dsa_switch *ds);
>   int (*set_addr)(struct dsa_switch *ds, u8 *addr);
>   u32 (*get_phy_flags)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port);
> 
> diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> index aeb6a7c..7c9914b 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/dsa.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> @@ -459,6 +459,10 @@ static void dsa_switch_destroy(struct dsa_switch *ds)
>   }
> 
>   mdiobus_unregister(ds->slave_mii_bus);
> +
> + /* Leave a chance to the driver to cleanup */
> + if (ds->drv->remove)
> + ds->drv->remove(ds);
>  }
> 
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> 


-- 
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 2/6] net: dsa: allow switch drivers to cleanup their resources

[Neil Armstrong]

Hi,
On 10/27/2015 04:39 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 27/10/15 07:48, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> Some switch drivers might request interrupts, remap register ranges,
>> allow such drivers to implement a "remove" callback doing just that.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Florian Fainelli 
> 
> This should probably be a Signed-off-by tag, but there is nothing using
> this, so you would want to introduce an user of this function in the
> same patch series so we see how you intend to use it?
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong 

Yes, I didn't know how to handle this since it was part of a larger patch.

I forgot to add this into the cover-letter but I wanted to send an RFC serie 
with
your bcm remove patch and a mv88e6xxx remove experimental code.

Yet, the mv88e6060 does not make usage of this.

Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH 2/6] net: dsa: allow switch drivers to cleanup their resources

[Vivien Didelot]

On Oct. Tuesday 27 (44) 04:43 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Hi,
> On 10/27/2015 04:39 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > On 27/10/15 07:48, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> >> Some switch drivers might request interrupts, remap register ranges,
> >> allow such drivers to implement a "remove" callback doing just that.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Florian Fainelli 
> > 
> > This should probably be a Signed-off-by tag, but there is nothing using
> > this, so you would want to introduce an user of this function in the
> > same patch series so we see how you intend to use it?
> > 
> >> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong 
> 
> Yes, I didn't know how to handle this since it was part of a larger patch.
> 
> I forgot to add this into the cover-letter but I wanted to send an RFC serie 
> with
> your bcm remove patch and a mv88e6xxx remove experimental code.
> 
> Yet, the mv88e6060 does not make usage of this.

So this patch must be part of your RFC for module removal instead of
this patchset.

Thanks,
-v
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/