Re: [PATCH 3/5] lockdep: Apply bit_spin_lock lockdep to zram
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:36:19AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > Hello, > > just for information Thank you for informing it. > > there was a proposal from -rt people to use normal spinlocks > for table's entries, rather that bitspinlock. I had a patch > some time ago, will obtain some performance data and post > RFC [may be tomorrow]. > > -ss >
Re: [PATCH 3/5] lockdep: Apply bit_spin_lock lockdep to zram
On (06/20/16 13:55), Byungchul Park wrote: > In order to use lockdep-enabled bit_spin_lock, we have to call > bit_spin_init() when a instance including the bit used as lock > creates, and bit_spin_free() when the instance including the bit > destroys. > > The zram is one of bit_spin_lock users. And this patch adds > bit_spin_init() and bit_spin_free() properly to apply the lock > correctness validator to bit_spin_lock the rzam is using. Hello, just for information there was a proposal from -rt people to use normal spinlocks for table's entries, rather that bitspinlock. I had a patch some time ago, will obtain some performance data and post RFC [may be tomorrow]. -ss > Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park > --- > drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 10 ++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c > index 370c2f7..2bc3bde 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c > @@ -495,6 +495,11 @@ static void zram_meta_free(struct zram_meta *meta, u64 > disksize) > } > > zs_destroy_pool(meta->mem_pool); > + > + for (index = 0; index < num_pages; index++) { > + bit_spin_free(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); > + } > + > vfree(meta->table); > kfree(meta); > } > @@ -503,6 +508,7 @@ static struct zram_meta *zram_meta_alloc(char *pool_name, > u64 disksize) > { > size_t num_pages; > struct zram_meta *meta = kmalloc(sizeof(*meta), GFP_KERNEL); > + int index; > > if (!meta) > return NULL; > @@ -520,6 +526,10 @@ static struct zram_meta *zram_meta_alloc(char > *pool_name, u64 disksize) > goto out_error; > } > > + for (index = 0; index < num_pages; index++) { > + bit_spin_init(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); > + } > + > return meta; > > out_error: > -- > 1.9.1 >
[PATCH 3/5] lockdep: Apply bit_spin_lock lockdep to zram
In order to use lockdep-enabled bit_spin_lock, we have to call bit_spin_init() when a instance including the bit used as lock creates, and bit_spin_free() when the instance including the bit destroys. The zram is one of bit_spin_lock users. And this patch adds bit_spin_init() and bit_spin_free() properly to apply the lock correctness validator to bit_spin_lock the rzam is using. Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park --- drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 10 ++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c index 370c2f7..2bc3bde 100644 --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c @@ -495,6 +495,11 @@ static void zram_meta_free(struct zram_meta *meta, u64 disksize) } zs_destroy_pool(meta->mem_pool); + + for (index = 0; index < num_pages; index++) { + bit_spin_free(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); + } + vfree(meta->table); kfree(meta); } @@ -503,6 +508,7 @@ static struct zram_meta *zram_meta_alloc(char *pool_name, u64 disksize) { size_t num_pages; struct zram_meta *meta = kmalloc(sizeof(*meta), GFP_KERNEL); + int index; if (!meta) return NULL; @@ -520,6 +526,10 @@ static struct zram_meta *zram_meta_alloc(char *pool_name, u64 disksize) goto out_error; } + for (index = 0; index < num_pages; index++) { + bit_spin_init(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value); + } + return meta; out_error: -- 1.9.1