Re: [PATCH 5.2 00/85] 5.2.16-stable review
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 05:28:49PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 18/09/2019 07:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.16 release. > > There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Fri 20 Sep 2019 06:09:47 AM UTC. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.2.16-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > > linux-5.2.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > All tests are passing for Tegra ... > > Test results for stable-v5.2: > 12 builds:12 pass, 0 fail > 22 boots: 22 pass, 0 fail > 38 tests: 38 pass, 0 fail > > Linux version:5.2.16-rc1-g2f63f02ef506 > Boards tested:tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-, > tegra194-p2972-, tegra20-ventana, > tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04 Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know. greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.2 00/85] 5.2.16-stable review
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 08:47:06PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at 11:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.16 release. > > There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Fri 20 Sep 2019 06:09:47 AM UTC. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.2.16-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > > linux-5.2.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Great, thanks for testing all of these and letting me know. greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.2 00/85] 5.2.16-stable review
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 07:22:50PM -0600, shuah wrote: > On 9/18/19 12:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.16 release. > > There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Fri 20 Sep 2019 06:09:47 AM UTC. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.2.16-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > > linux-5.2.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know. greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 5.2 00/85] 5.2.16-stable review
On 9/18/19 12:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.16 release. There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Fri 20 Sep 2019 06:09:47 AM UTC. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.2.16-rc1.gz or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.2.y and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. thanks, -- Shuah
Re: [PATCH 5.2 00/85] 5.2.16-stable review
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 08:18:18AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.16 release. > There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri 20 Sep 2019 06:09:47 AM UTC. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 390 pass: 390 fail: 0 Guenter
Re: [PATCH 5.2 00/85] 5.2.16-stable review
On 18/09/2019 07:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.16 release. > There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri 20 Sep 2019 06:09:47 AM UTC. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.2.16-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.2.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h All tests are passing for Tegra ... Test results for stable-v5.2: 12 builds: 12 pass, 0 fail 22 boots: 22 pass, 0 fail 38 tests: 38 pass, 0 fail Linux version: 5.2.16-rc1-g2f63f02ef506 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-, tegra194-p2972-, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04 Cheers Jon -- nvpublic
Re: [PATCH 5.2 00/85] 5.2.16-stable review
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at 11:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.16 release. > There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri 20 Sep 2019 06:09:47 AM UTC. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.2.16-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > linux-5.2.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Summary kernel: 5.2.16-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.2.y git commit: 2f63f02ef5061324ba168b1cb01c89fd89a0c593 git describe: v5.2.15-86-g2f63f02ef506 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-5.2-oe/build/v5.2.15-86-g2f63f02ef506 No regressions (compared to build v5.2.15) No fixes (compared to build v5.2.15) Ran 22511 total tests in the following environments and test suites. Environments -- - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - x15 - x86 Test Suites --- * build * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-timers-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * spectre-meltdown-checker-test * v4l2-compliance * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * kvm-unit-tests * ssuite * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Re: [PATCH 5.2 00/85] 5.2.16-stable review
stable-rc/linux-5.2.y boot: 145 boots: 1 failed, 135 passed with 8 offline, 1 conflict (v5.2.15-86-g2f63f02ef506) Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-5.2.y/kernel/v5.2.15-86-g2f63f02ef506/ Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-5.2.y/kernel/v5.2.15-86-g2f63f02ef506/ Tree: stable-rc Branch: linux-5.2.y Git Describe: v5.2.15-86-g2f63f02ef506 Git Commit: 2f63f02ef5061324ba168b1cb01c89fd89a0c593 Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Tested: 82 unique boards, 28 SoC families, 17 builds out of 209 Boot Failure Detected: arm64: defconfig: gcc-8: rk3399-firefly: 1 failed lab Offline Platforms: arm64: defconfig: gcc-8 apq8016-sbc: 1 offline lab arm: multi_v7_defconfig: gcc-8 qcom-apq8064-cm-qs600: 1 offline lab qcom-apq8064-ifc6410: 1 offline lab sun5i-r8-chip: 1 offline lab davinci_all_defconfig: gcc-8 dm365evm,legacy: 1 offline lab qcom_defconfig: gcc-8 qcom-apq8064-cm-qs600: 1 offline lab qcom-apq8064-ifc6410: 1 offline lab sunxi_defconfig: gcc-8 sun5i-r8-chip: 1 offline lab Conflicting Boot Failure Detected: (These likely are not failures as other labs are reporting PASS. Needs review.) arm: omap2plus_defconfig: omap4-panda: lab-baylibre: FAIL (gcc-8) lab-baylibre-seattle: PASS (gcc-8) lab-collabora: PASS (gcc-8) --- For more info write to
[PATCH 5.2 00/85] 5.2.16-stable review
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.2.16 release. There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Fri 20 Sep 2019 06:09:47 AM UTC. Anything received after that time might be too late. The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.2.16-rc1.gz or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.2.y and the diffstat can be found below. thanks, greg k-h - Pseudo-Shortlog of commits: Greg Kroah-Hartman Linux 5.2.16-rc1 Linus Torvalds x86/build: Add -Wnoaddress-of-packed-member to REALMODE_CFLAGS, to silence GCC9 build warning Hui Peng rsi: fix a double free bug in rsi_91x_deinit() Enrico Weigelt platform/x86: pcengines-apuv2: use KEY_RESTART for front button Steffen Dirkwinkel platform/x86: pmc_atom: Add CB4063 Beckhoff Automation board to critclk_systems DMI table Liran Alon KVM: SVM: Fix detection of AMD Errata 1096 Jim Mattson kvm: nVMX: Remove unnecessary sync_roots from handle_invept Jessica Yu modules: always page-align module section allocations Yang Yingliang modules: fix compile error if don't have strict module rwx Yang Yingliang modules: fix BUG when load module with rodata=n Olivier Moysan iio: adc: stm32-dfsdm: fix data type Olivier Moysan iio: adc: stm32-dfsdm: fix output resolution Mario Limonciello Revert "Bluetooth: btusb: driver to enable the usb-wakeup feature" Gustavo A. R. Silva mm/z3fold.c: fix lock/unlock imbalance in z3fold_page_isolate Henry Burns mm/z3fold.c: remove z3fold_migration trylock Nishka Dasgupta drm/mediatek: mtk_drm_drv.c: Add of_node_put() before goto Hans de Goede drm: panel-orientation-quirks: Add extra quirk table entry for GPD MicroPC Andrew F. Davis firmware: ti_sci: Always request response from firmware Christophe Leroy crypto: talitos - HMAC SNOOP NO AFEU mode requires SW icv checking. Christophe Leroy crypto: talitos - Do not modify req->cryptlen on decryption. Christophe Leroy crypto: talitos - fix ECB algs ivsize Christophe Leroy crypto: talitos - check data blocksize in ablkcipher. Christophe Leroy crypto: talitos - fix CTR alg blocksize Christophe Leroy crypto: talitos - check AES key size Muchun Song driver core: Fix use-after-free and double free on glue directory Richard Weinberger ubifs: Correctly use tnc_next() in search_dh_cookie() Alex Williamson PCI: Always allow probing with driver_override Xiaolei Li mtd: rawnand: mtk: Fix wrongly assigned OOB buffer pointer issue Douglas Anderson clk: rockchip: Don't yell about bad mmc phases when getting Dan Carpenter mt76: mt7615: Use after free in mt7615_mcu_set_bcn() Dan Carpenter mt76: Fix a signedness bug in mt7615_add_interface() Stephen Boyd clk: Simplify debugfs printing and add a newline Chen-Yu Tsai clk: Fix debugfs clk_possible_parents for clks without parent string names Neil Armstrong drm/meson: Add support for XBGR & ABGR formats Mimi Zohar x86/ima: check EFI SetupMode too Junichi Nomura x86/boot: Use efi_setup_data for searching RSDP on kexec-ed kernels YueHaibing kernel/module: Fix mem leak in module_add_modinfo_attrs Suraj Jitindar Singh powerpc: Add barrier_nospec to raw_copy_in_user() Steve Wahl x86/purgatory: Change compiler flags from -mcmodel=kernel to -mcmodel=large to fix kexec relocation errors Paolo Bonzini KVM: nVMX: handle page fault in vmread Sean Christopherson KVM: x86/mmu: Reintroduce fast invalidate/zap for flushing memslot Fuqian Huang KVM: x86: work around leak of uninitialized stack contents Thomas Huth KVM: s390: Do not leak kernel stack data in the KVM_S390_INTERRUPT ioctl Igor Mammedov KVM: s390: kvm_s390_vm_start_migration: check dirty_bitmap before using it as target for memset() Andreas Kemnade regulator: twl: voltage lists for vdd1/2 on twl4030 Yunfeng Ye genirq: Prevent NULL pointer dereference in resend_irqs() Stanislaw Gruszka mt76: mt76x0e: disable 5GHz band for MT7630E Stanislaw Gruszka Revert "rt2800: enable TX_PIN_CFG_LNA_PE_ bits per band" Alexander Duyck ixgbe: Prevent u8 wrapping of ITR value to something less than 10us Ilya Maximets ixgbe: fix double clean of Tx descriptors with xdp Arnd Bergmann ipc: fix sparc64 ipc() wrapper Arnd Bergmann ipc: fix semtimedop for generic 32-bit architectures Chris Wilson drm/i915: Restore relaxed padding (OCL_OOB_SUPPRES_ENABLE) for skl+ Ville Syrjälä drm/i915: Limit MST to <= 8bpc once again Vasily Khoruzhick drm/lima: fix lima_gem_wait() return value Ulf Hansson
