From: Jia Cheng Hu <jia.jiachen...@gmail.com>
Since commit c5089591c3ba ("block, bfq: detect wakers and
unconditionally inject their I/O"), when the in-service bfq_queue, say
Q, is temporarily empty, BFQ checks whether there are I/O requests to
inject (also) from the waker bfq_queue for Q. To this goal, the value
pointed by bfqq->waker_bfqq->next_rq must be controlled. However, the
current implementation mistakenly looks at bfqq->next_rq, which
instead points to the next request of the currently served queue.
This mistake evidently causes losses of throughput in scenarios with
waker bfq_queues.
This commit corrects this mistake.
Fixes: c5089591c3ba ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally inject
their I/O")
Signed-off-by: Jia Cheng Hu <jia.jiachen...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.vale...@linaro.org>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index eb2ca32d5b63..fdc5e163b2fe 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -4499,7 +4499,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_select_queue(struct bfq_data
*bfqd)
bfqq = bfqq->bic->bfqq[0];
else if (bfq_bfqq_has_waker(bfqq) &&
bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq->waker_bfqq) &&
- bfqq->next_rq &&
+ bfqq->waker_bfqq->next_rq &&
bfq_serv_to_charge(bfqq->waker_bfqq->next_rq,
bfqq->waker_bfqq) <=
bfq_bfqq_budget_left(bfqq->waker_bfqq)
--
2.20.1
