Re: [PATCH RFC 2/8] rcu: Clarify usage of cond_resched for tasks-RCU
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 05:35:55PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:22:05AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:54:54AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > On Sun, 13 May 2018 20:15:35 -0700 > > > "Joel Fernandes (Google)"wrote: > > > > > > > Recently we had a discussion about cond_resched unconditionally > > > > recording a voluntary context switch [1]. > > > > > > > > Lets add a comment clarifying that how this API is to be used. > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1526027434-21237-1-git-send-email-byungchul.p...@lge.com > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) > > > > --- > > > > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 11 --- > > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > > > > index 743226176350..a9881007ece6 100644 > > > > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h > > > > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > > > > @@ -159,8 +159,12 @@ static inline void rcu_init_nohz(void) { } > > > > } while (0) > > > > > > > > /* > > > > - * Note a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks benefit. This is a > > > > - * macro rather than an inline function to avoid #include hell. > > > > + * Note an attempt to perform a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks > > > > benefit. > > > > + * > > > > + * This is called even in situations where a context switch didn't > > > > really > > > > + * happen even though it was requested. The caller uses it to indicate > > > > + * traversal of an RCU-tasks quiescent state. This is a macro rather > > > > than an > > > > + * inline function to avoid #include hell. > > > > > > I don't know. I just don't like the wording. It sounds too much like > > > it was written by someone that was confused for it being called when a > > > context switch didn't occur ;-) > > True :) > > > > > > > What about something more like: > > > > > > /* > > > * This is called to denote a RCU-task quiescent state. It is placed at > > > * voluntary preemption points, as RCU-task critical sections may not > > > * perform voluntary preemption or scheduling calls. It does not matter > > > * if the task is scheduled out or not, just that a voluntary preemption > > > * may be done. > > > */ > > > > s/RCU-task/RCU-tasks/ and I am good with this. > > Ok. I like Steve's comment better too. > > Btw, I see you just posted a change of the macro name from > rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch_lite to rcu_tasks_qs which actually in > itself is much more descriptive. Considering this, I feel the new name is > quite self-documenting in itself. So I am more inclined to drop this patch in > any series reposting, but let me know if you feel otherwise. I agree, but let's see what other people think. Thanx, Paul
Re: [PATCH RFC 2/8] rcu: Clarify usage of cond_resched for tasks-RCU
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 05:35:55PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:22:05AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:54:54AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > On Sun, 13 May 2018 20:15:35 -0700 > > > "Joel Fernandes (Google)" wrote: > > > > > > > Recently we had a discussion about cond_resched unconditionally > > > > recording a voluntary context switch [1]. > > > > > > > > Lets add a comment clarifying that how this API is to be used. > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1526027434-21237-1-git-send-email-byungchul.p...@lge.com > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) > > > > --- > > > > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 11 --- > > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > > > > index 743226176350..a9881007ece6 100644 > > > > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h > > > > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > > > > @@ -159,8 +159,12 @@ static inline void rcu_init_nohz(void) { } > > > > } while (0) > > > > > > > > /* > > > > - * Note a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks benefit. This is a > > > > - * macro rather than an inline function to avoid #include hell. > > > > + * Note an attempt to perform a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks > > > > benefit. > > > > + * > > > > + * This is called even in situations where a context switch didn't > > > > really > > > > + * happen even though it was requested. The caller uses it to indicate > > > > + * traversal of an RCU-tasks quiescent state. This is a macro rather > > > > than an > > > > + * inline function to avoid #include hell. > > > > > > I don't know. I just don't like the wording. It sounds too much like > > > it was written by someone that was confused for it being called when a > > > context switch didn't occur ;-) > > True :) > > > > > > > What about something more like: > > > > > > /* > > > * This is called to denote a RCU-task quiescent state. It is placed at > > > * voluntary preemption points, as RCU-task critical sections may not > > > * perform voluntary preemption or scheduling calls. It does not matter > > > * if the task is scheduled out or not, just that a voluntary preemption > > > * may be done. > > > */ > > > > s/RCU-task/RCU-tasks/ and I am good with this. > > Ok. I like Steve's comment better too. > > Btw, I see you just posted a change of the macro name from > rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch_lite to rcu_tasks_qs which actually in > itself is much more descriptive. Considering this, I feel the new name is > quite self-documenting in itself. So I am more inclined to drop this patch in > any series reposting, but let me know if you feel otherwise. I agree, but let's see what other people think. Thanx, Paul
Re: [PATCH RFC 2/8] rcu: Clarify usage of cond_resched for tasks-RCU
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:22:05AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:54:54AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Sun, 13 May 2018 20:15:35 -0700 > > "Joel Fernandes (Google)"wrote: > > > > > Recently we had a discussion about cond_resched unconditionally > > > recording a voluntary context switch [1]. > > > > > > Lets add a comment clarifying that how this API is to be used. > > > > > > [1] > > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1526027434-21237-1-git-send-email-byungchul.p...@lge.com > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) > > > --- > > > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 11 --- > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > > > index 743226176350..a9881007ece6 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > > > @@ -159,8 +159,12 @@ static inline void rcu_init_nohz(void) { } > > > } while (0) > > > > > > /* > > > - * Note a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks benefit. This is a > > > - * macro rather than an inline function to avoid #include hell. > > > + * Note an attempt to perform a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks > > > benefit. > > > + * > > > + * This is called even in situations where a context switch didn't really > > > + * happen even though it was requested. The caller uses it to indicate > > > + * traversal of an RCU-tasks quiescent state. This is a macro rather > > > than an > > > + * inline function to avoid #include hell. > > > > I don't know. I just don't like the wording. It sounds too much like > > it was written by someone that was confused for it being called when a > > context switch didn't occur ;-) True :) > > > > What about something more like: > > > > /* > > * This is called to denote a RCU-task quiescent state. It is placed at > > * voluntary preemption points, as RCU-task critical sections may not > > * perform voluntary preemption or scheduling calls. It does not matter > > * if the task is scheduled out or not, just that a voluntary preemption > > * may be done. > > */ > > s/RCU-task/RCU-tasks/ and I am good with this. Ok. I like Steve's comment better too. Btw, I see you just posted a change of the macro name from rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch_lite to rcu_tasks_qs which actually in itself is much more descriptive. Considering this, I feel the new name is quite self-documenting in itself. So I am more inclined to drop this patch in any series reposting, but let me know if you feel otherwise. thanks, - Joel
Re: [PATCH RFC 2/8] rcu: Clarify usage of cond_resched for tasks-RCU
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:22:05AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:54:54AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Sun, 13 May 2018 20:15:35 -0700 > > "Joel Fernandes (Google)" wrote: > > > > > Recently we had a discussion about cond_resched unconditionally > > > recording a voluntary context switch [1]. > > > > > > Lets add a comment clarifying that how this API is to be used. > > > > > > [1] > > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1526027434-21237-1-git-send-email-byungchul.p...@lge.com > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) > > > --- > > > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 11 --- > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > > > index 743226176350..a9881007ece6 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > > > @@ -159,8 +159,12 @@ static inline void rcu_init_nohz(void) { } > > > } while (0) > > > > > > /* > > > - * Note a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks benefit. This is a > > > - * macro rather than an inline function to avoid #include hell. > > > + * Note an attempt to perform a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks > > > benefit. > > > + * > > > + * This is called even in situations where a context switch didn't really > > > + * happen even though it was requested. The caller uses it to indicate > > > + * traversal of an RCU-tasks quiescent state. This is a macro rather > > > than an > > > + * inline function to avoid #include hell. > > > > I don't know. I just don't like the wording. It sounds too much like > > it was written by someone that was confused for it being called when a > > context switch didn't occur ;-) True :) > > > > What about something more like: > > > > /* > > * This is called to denote a RCU-task quiescent state. It is placed at > > * voluntary preemption points, as RCU-task critical sections may not > > * perform voluntary preemption or scheduling calls. It does not matter > > * if the task is scheduled out or not, just that a voluntary preemption > > * may be done. > > */ > > s/RCU-task/RCU-tasks/ and I am good with this. Ok. I like Steve's comment better too. Btw, I see you just posted a change of the macro name from rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch_lite to rcu_tasks_qs which actually in itself is much more descriptive. Considering this, I feel the new name is quite self-documenting in itself. So I am more inclined to drop this patch in any series reposting, but let me know if you feel otherwise. thanks, - Joel
Re: [PATCH RFC 2/8] rcu: Clarify usage of cond_resched for tasks-RCU
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:54:54AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Sun, 13 May 2018 20:15:35 -0700 > "Joel Fernandes (Google)"wrote: > > > Recently we had a discussion about cond_resched unconditionally > > recording a voluntary context switch [1]. > > > > Lets add a comment clarifying that how this API is to be used. > > > > [1] > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1526027434-21237-1-git-send-email-byungchul.p...@lge.com > > > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) > > --- > > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 11 --- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > > index 743226176350..a9881007ece6 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h > > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > > @@ -159,8 +159,12 @@ static inline void rcu_init_nohz(void) { } > > } while (0) > > > > /* > > - * Note a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks benefit. This is a > > - * macro rather than an inline function to avoid #include hell. > > + * Note an attempt to perform a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks > > benefit. > > + * > > + * This is called even in situations where a context switch didn't really > > + * happen even though it was requested. The caller uses it to indicate > > + * traversal of an RCU-tasks quiescent state. This is a macro rather than > > an > > + * inline function to avoid #include hell. > > I don't know. I just don't like the wording. It sounds too much like > it was written by someone that was confused for it being called when a > context switch didn't occur ;-) > > What about something more like: > > /* > * This is called to denote a RCU-task quiescent state. It is placed at > * voluntary preemption points, as RCU-task critical sections may not > * perform voluntary preemption or scheduling calls. It does not matter > * if the task is scheduled out or not, just that a voluntary preemption > * may be done. > */ s/RCU-task/RCU-tasks/ and I am good with this. Thanx, Paul > > */ > > #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU > > #define rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch_lite(t) \ > > @@ -187,7 +191,8 @@ static inline void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) { } > > #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU */ > > > > /** > > - * cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs - Report potential quiescent states to RCU > > + * cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs - Report potential quiescent states to RCU. > > + * The quiescent state report is made even if cond_resched() did nothing. > > Same thing here. > > * The quiescent state report does not depend on cond_resched() scheduling. > > -- Steve > > > > * > > * This macro resembles cond_resched(), except that it is defined to > > * report potential quiescent states to RCU-tasks even if the > > cond_resched() >
Re: [PATCH RFC 2/8] rcu: Clarify usage of cond_resched for tasks-RCU
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:54:54AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Sun, 13 May 2018 20:15:35 -0700 > "Joel Fernandes (Google)" wrote: > > > Recently we had a discussion about cond_resched unconditionally > > recording a voluntary context switch [1]. > > > > Lets add a comment clarifying that how this API is to be used. > > > > [1] > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1526027434-21237-1-git-send-email-byungchul.p...@lge.com > > > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) > > --- > > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 11 --- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > > index 743226176350..a9881007ece6 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h > > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > > @@ -159,8 +159,12 @@ static inline void rcu_init_nohz(void) { } > > } while (0) > > > > /* > > - * Note a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks benefit. This is a > > - * macro rather than an inline function to avoid #include hell. > > + * Note an attempt to perform a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks > > benefit. > > + * > > + * This is called even in situations where a context switch didn't really > > + * happen even though it was requested. The caller uses it to indicate > > + * traversal of an RCU-tasks quiescent state. This is a macro rather than > > an > > + * inline function to avoid #include hell. > > I don't know. I just don't like the wording. It sounds too much like > it was written by someone that was confused for it being called when a > context switch didn't occur ;-) > > What about something more like: > > /* > * This is called to denote a RCU-task quiescent state. It is placed at > * voluntary preemption points, as RCU-task critical sections may not > * perform voluntary preemption or scheduling calls. It does not matter > * if the task is scheduled out or not, just that a voluntary preemption > * may be done. > */ s/RCU-task/RCU-tasks/ and I am good with this. Thanx, Paul > > */ > > #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU > > #define rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch_lite(t) \ > > @@ -187,7 +191,8 @@ static inline void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) { } > > #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU */ > > > > /** > > - * cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs - Report potential quiescent states to RCU > > + * cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs - Report potential quiescent states to RCU. > > + * The quiescent state report is made even if cond_resched() did nothing. > > Same thing here. > > * The quiescent state report does not depend on cond_resched() scheduling. > > -- Steve > > > > * > > * This macro resembles cond_resched(), except that it is defined to > > * report potential quiescent states to RCU-tasks even if the > > cond_resched() >
Re: [PATCH RFC 2/8] rcu: Clarify usage of cond_resched for tasks-RCU
On Sun, 13 May 2018 20:15:35 -0700 "Joel Fernandes (Google)"wrote: > Recently we had a discussion about cond_resched unconditionally > recording a voluntary context switch [1]. > > Lets add a comment clarifying that how this API is to be used. > > [1] > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1526027434-21237-1-git-send-email-byungchul.p...@lge.com > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) > --- > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 11 --- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > index 743226176350..a9881007ece6 100644 > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > @@ -159,8 +159,12 @@ static inline void rcu_init_nohz(void) { } > } while (0) > > /* > - * Note a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks benefit. This is a > - * macro rather than an inline function to avoid #include hell. > + * Note an attempt to perform a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks > benefit. > + * > + * This is called even in situations where a context switch didn't really > + * happen even though it was requested. The caller uses it to indicate > + * traversal of an RCU-tasks quiescent state. This is a macro rather than an > + * inline function to avoid #include hell. I don't know. I just don't like the wording. It sounds too much like it was written by someone that was confused for it being called when a context switch didn't occur ;-) What about something more like: /* * This is called to denote a RCU-task quiescent state. It is placed at * voluntary preemption points, as RCU-task critical sections may not * perform voluntary preemption or scheduling calls. It does not matter * if the task is scheduled out or not, just that a voluntary preemption * may be done. */ > */ > #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU > #define rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch_lite(t) \ > @@ -187,7 +191,8 @@ static inline void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) { } > #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU */ > > /** > - * cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs - Report potential quiescent states to RCU > + * cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs - Report potential quiescent states to RCU. > + * The quiescent state report is made even if cond_resched() did nothing. Same thing here. * The quiescent state report does not depend on cond_resched() scheduling. -- Steve > * > * This macro resembles cond_resched(), except that it is defined to > * report potential quiescent states to RCU-tasks even if the cond_resched()
Re: [PATCH RFC 2/8] rcu: Clarify usage of cond_resched for tasks-RCU
On Sun, 13 May 2018 20:15:35 -0700 "Joel Fernandes (Google)" wrote: > Recently we had a discussion about cond_resched unconditionally > recording a voluntary context switch [1]. > > Lets add a comment clarifying that how this API is to be used. > > [1] > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1526027434-21237-1-git-send-email-byungchul.p...@lge.com > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) > --- > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 11 --- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > index 743226176350..a9881007ece6 100644 > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > @@ -159,8 +159,12 @@ static inline void rcu_init_nohz(void) { } > } while (0) > > /* > - * Note a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks benefit. This is a > - * macro rather than an inline function to avoid #include hell. > + * Note an attempt to perform a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks > benefit. > + * > + * This is called even in situations where a context switch didn't really > + * happen even though it was requested. The caller uses it to indicate > + * traversal of an RCU-tasks quiescent state. This is a macro rather than an > + * inline function to avoid #include hell. I don't know. I just don't like the wording. It sounds too much like it was written by someone that was confused for it being called when a context switch didn't occur ;-) What about something more like: /* * This is called to denote a RCU-task quiescent state. It is placed at * voluntary preemption points, as RCU-task critical sections may not * perform voluntary preemption or scheduling calls. It does not matter * if the task is scheduled out or not, just that a voluntary preemption * may be done. */ > */ > #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU > #define rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch_lite(t) \ > @@ -187,7 +191,8 @@ static inline void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) { } > #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU */ > > /** > - * cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs - Report potential quiescent states to RCU > + * cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs - Report potential quiescent states to RCU. > + * The quiescent state report is made even if cond_resched() did nothing. Same thing here. * The quiescent state report does not depend on cond_resched() scheduling. -- Steve > * > * This macro resembles cond_resched(), except that it is defined to > * report potential quiescent states to RCU-tasks even if the cond_resched()
[PATCH RFC 2/8] rcu: Clarify usage of cond_resched for tasks-RCU
Recently we had a discussion about cond_resched unconditionally recording a voluntary context switch [1]. Lets add a comment clarifying that how this API is to be used. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1526027434-21237-1-git-send-email-byungchul.p...@lge.com Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google)--- include/linux/rcupdate.h | 11 --- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h index 743226176350..a9881007ece6 100644 --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h @@ -159,8 +159,12 @@ static inline void rcu_init_nohz(void) { } } while (0) /* - * Note a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks benefit. This is a - * macro rather than an inline function to avoid #include hell. + * Note an attempt to perform a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks benefit. + * + * This is called even in situations where a context switch didn't really + * happen even though it was requested. The caller uses it to indicate + * traversal of an RCU-tasks quiescent state. This is a macro rather than an + * inline function to avoid #include hell. */ #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU #define rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch_lite(t) \ @@ -187,7 +191,8 @@ static inline void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) { } #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU */ /** - * cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs - Report potential quiescent states to RCU + * cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs - Report potential quiescent states to RCU. + * The quiescent state report is made even if cond_resched() did nothing. * * This macro resembles cond_resched(), except that it is defined to * report potential quiescent states to RCU-tasks even if the cond_resched() -- 2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog
[PATCH RFC 2/8] rcu: Clarify usage of cond_resched for tasks-RCU
Recently we had a discussion about cond_resched unconditionally recording a voluntary context switch [1]. Lets add a comment clarifying that how this API is to be used. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1526027434-21237-1-git-send-email-byungchul.p...@lge.com Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) --- include/linux/rcupdate.h | 11 --- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h index 743226176350..a9881007ece6 100644 --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h @@ -159,8 +159,12 @@ static inline void rcu_init_nohz(void) { } } while (0) /* - * Note a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks benefit. This is a - * macro rather than an inline function to avoid #include hell. + * Note an attempt to perform a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks benefit. + * + * This is called even in situations where a context switch didn't really + * happen even though it was requested. The caller uses it to indicate + * traversal of an RCU-tasks quiescent state. This is a macro rather than an + * inline function to avoid #include hell. */ #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU #define rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch_lite(t) \ @@ -187,7 +191,8 @@ static inline void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) { } #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU */ /** - * cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs - Report potential quiescent states to RCU + * cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs - Report potential quiescent states to RCU. + * The quiescent state report is made even if cond_resched() did nothing. * * This macro resembles cond_resched(), except that it is defined to * report potential quiescent states to RCU-tasks even if the cond_resched() -- 2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog