Re: [PATCH RFT] regulator: palmas: Fix calcuating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:29:03AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote: > The logic of calculating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps() does not match > the logic to list voltage in palmas_list_voltage_smps(). Applied, thanks. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [PATCH RFT] regulator: palmas: Fix calcuating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps
Good catch, thanks I totally forgot about the range bit in that function. Acked-by: Graeme Gregory On 17/07/12 04:29, Axel Lin wrote: > The logic of calculating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps() does not match > the logic to list voltage in palmas_list_voltage_smps(). > > We use below equation to calculate voltage when selector > 0: > voltage = (0.49V + (selector * 0.01V)) * RANGE > RANGE is either x1 or x2 > > So we need to take into account with the multiplier set in VSEL register when > calculating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps() > > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin > --- > drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c | 17 ++--- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c > b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c > index 7540c95..17d19fb 100644 > --- a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c > +++ b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c > @@ -373,11 +373,22 @@ static int palmas_set_voltage_smps_sel(struct > regulator_dev *dev, > static int palmas_map_voltage_smps(struct regulator_dev *rdev, > int min_uV, int max_uV) > { > + struct palmas_pmic *pmic = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev); > + int id = rdev_get_id(rdev); > int ret, voltage; > > - ret = ((min_uV - 50) / 1) + 1; > - if (ret < 0) > - return ret; > + if (min_uV == 0) > + return 0; > + > + if (pmic->range[id]) { /* RANGE is x2 */ > + if (min_uV < 100) > + min_uV = 100; > + ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_uV - 100, 2) + 1; > + } else {/* RANGE is x1 */ > + if (min_uV < 50) > + min_uV = 50; > + ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_uV - 50, 1) + 1; > + } > > /* Map back into a voltage to verify we're still in bounds */ > voltage = palmas_list_voltage_smps(rdev, ret); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH RFT] regulator: palmas: Fix calcuating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps
Good catch, thanks I totally forgot about the range bit in that function. Acked-by: Graeme Gregory g...@slimlogic.co.uk On 17/07/12 04:29, Axel Lin wrote: The logic of calculating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps() does not match the logic to list voltage in palmas_list_voltage_smps(). We use below equation to calculate voltage when selector 0: voltage = (0.49V + (selector * 0.01V)) * RANGE RANGE is either x1 or x2 So we need to take into account with the multiplier set in VSEL register when calculating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps() Signed-off-by: Axel Lin axel@gmail.com --- drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c | 17 ++--- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c index 7540c95..17d19fb 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c @@ -373,11 +373,22 @@ static int palmas_set_voltage_smps_sel(struct regulator_dev *dev, static int palmas_map_voltage_smps(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int min_uV, int max_uV) { + struct palmas_pmic *pmic = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev); + int id = rdev_get_id(rdev); int ret, voltage; - ret = ((min_uV - 50) / 1) + 1; - if (ret 0) - return ret; + if (min_uV == 0) + return 0; + + if (pmic-range[id]) { /* RANGE is x2 */ + if (min_uV 100) + min_uV = 100; + ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_uV - 100, 2) + 1; + } else {/* RANGE is x1 */ + if (min_uV 50) + min_uV = 50; + ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_uV - 50, 1) + 1; + } /* Map back into a voltage to verify we're still in bounds */ voltage = palmas_list_voltage_smps(rdev, ret); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH RFT] regulator: palmas: Fix calcuating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:29:03AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote: The logic of calculating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps() does not match the logic to list voltage in palmas_list_voltage_smps(). Applied, thanks. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[PATCH RFT] regulator: palmas: Fix calcuating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps
The logic of calculating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps() does not match the logic to list voltage in palmas_list_voltage_smps(). We use below equation to calculate voltage when selector > 0: voltage = (0.49V + (selector * 0.01V)) * RANGE RANGE is either x1 or x2 So we need to take into account with the multiplier set in VSEL register when calculating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps() Signed-off-by: Axel Lin --- drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c | 17 ++--- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c index 7540c95..17d19fb 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c @@ -373,11 +373,22 @@ static int palmas_set_voltage_smps_sel(struct regulator_dev *dev, static int palmas_map_voltage_smps(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int min_uV, int max_uV) { + struct palmas_pmic *pmic = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev); + int id = rdev_get_id(rdev); int ret, voltage; - ret = ((min_uV - 50) / 1) + 1; - if (ret < 0) - return ret; + if (min_uV == 0) + return 0; + + if (pmic->range[id]) { /* RANGE is x2 */ + if (min_uV < 100) + min_uV = 100; + ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_uV - 100, 2) + 1; + } else {/* RANGE is x1 */ + if (min_uV < 50) + min_uV = 50; + ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_uV - 50, 1) + 1; + } /* Map back into a voltage to verify we're still in bounds */ voltage = palmas_list_voltage_smps(rdev, ret); -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH RFT] regulator: palmas: Fix calcuating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps
The logic of calculating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps() does not match the logic to list voltage in palmas_list_voltage_smps(). We use below equation to calculate voltage when selector 0: voltage = (0.49V + (selector * 0.01V)) * RANGE RANGE is either x1 or x2 So we need to take into account with the multiplier set in VSEL register when calculating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps() Signed-off-by: Axel Lin axel@gmail.com --- drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c | 17 ++--- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c index 7540c95..17d19fb 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c @@ -373,11 +373,22 @@ static int palmas_set_voltage_smps_sel(struct regulator_dev *dev, static int palmas_map_voltage_smps(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int min_uV, int max_uV) { + struct palmas_pmic *pmic = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev); + int id = rdev_get_id(rdev); int ret, voltage; - ret = ((min_uV - 50) / 1) + 1; - if (ret 0) - return ret; + if (min_uV == 0) + return 0; + + if (pmic-range[id]) { /* RANGE is x2 */ + if (min_uV 100) + min_uV = 100; + ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_uV - 100, 2) + 1; + } else {/* RANGE is x1 */ + if (min_uV 50) + min_uV = 50; + ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_uV - 50, 1) + 1; + } /* Map back into a voltage to verify we're still in bounds */ voltage = palmas_list_voltage_smps(rdev, ret); -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/