Re: [PATCH V2 4/9] vhost: reset invalidate_count in vhost_set_vring_num_addr()

2019-07-31 Thread Jason Wang



On 2019/8/1 上午3:32, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:29:28PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:

On 2019/7/31 下午8:41, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:46:50AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:

The vhost_set_vring_num_addr() could be called in the middle of
invalidate_range_start() and invalidate_range_end(). If we don't reset
invalidate_count after the un-registering of MMU notifier, the
invalidate_cont will run out of sync (e.g never reach zero). This will
in fact disable the fast accessor path. Fixing by reset the count to
zero.

Reported-by: Michael S. Tsirkin 

Did Michael report this as well?


Correct me if I was wrong. I think it's point 4 described in
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/21/25.

I'm not sure what that is talking about

But this fixes what I described:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/22/554

Jason



I'm sorry I miss this, will add your name as reported-by in the next 
version.


Thanks



Re: [PATCH V2 4/9] vhost: reset invalidate_count in vhost_set_vring_num_addr()

2019-07-31 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:32:52PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:29:28PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > 
> > On 2019/7/31 下午8:41, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:46:50AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > The vhost_set_vring_num_addr() could be called in the middle of
> > > > invalidate_range_start() and invalidate_range_end(). If we don't reset
> > > > invalidate_count after the un-registering of MMU notifier, the
> > > > invalidate_cont will run out of sync (e.g never reach zero). This will
> > > > in fact disable the fast accessor path. Fixing by reset the count to
> > > > zero.
> > > > 
> > > > Reported-by: Michael S. Tsirkin 
> > > Did Michael report this as well?
> > 
> > 
> > Correct me if I was wrong. I think it's point 4 described in
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/21/25.
> 
> I'm not sure what that is talking about
> 
> But this fixes what I described:
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/22/554
> 
> Jason

These are two reasons for a possible counter imbalance.
Unsurprisingly they are both fixed if you reset the counter to 0.

-- 
MST


Re: [PATCH V2 4/9] vhost: reset invalidate_count in vhost_set_vring_num_addr()

2019-07-31 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:29:28PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> On 2019/7/31 下午8:41, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:46:50AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > The vhost_set_vring_num_addr() could be called in the middle of
> > > invalidate_range_start() and invalidate_range_end(). If we don't reset
> > > invalidate_count after the un-registering of MMU notifier, the
> > > invalidate_cont will run out of sync (e.g never reach zero). This will
> > > in fact disable the fast accessor path. Fixing by reset the count to
> > > zero.
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: Michael S. Tsirkin 
> > Did Michael report this as well?
> 
> 
> Correct me if I was wrong. I think it's point 4 described in
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/21/25.

I'm not sure what that is talking about

But this fixes what I described:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/22/554

Jason


Re: [PATCH V2 4/9] vhost: reset invalidate_count in vhost_set_vring_num_addr()

2019-07-31 Thread Jason Wang



On 2019/7/31 下午8:41, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:46:50AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:

The vhost_set_vring_num_addr() could be called in the middle of
invalidate_range_start() and invalidate_range_end(). If we don't reset
invalidate_count after the un-registering of MMU notifier, the
invalidate_cont will run out of sync (e.g never reach zero). This will
in fact disable the fast accessor path. Fixing by reset the count to
zero.

Reported-by: Michael S. Tsirkin 

Did Michael report this as well?



Correct me if I was wrong. I think it's point 4 described in 
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/21/25.


Thanks





Fixes: 7f466032dc9e ("vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual address")
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang 
  drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 4 
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index 2a3154976277..2a7217c33668 100644
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -2073,6 +2073,10 @@ static long vhost_vring_set_num_addr(struct vhost_dev *d,
d->has_notifier = false;
}
  
+	/* reset invalidate_count in case we are in the middle of

+* invalidate_start() and invalidate_end().
+*/
+   vq->invalidate_count = 0;
vhost_uninit_vq_maps(vq);
  #endif
  


Re: [PATCH V2 4/9] vhost: reset invalidate_count in vhost_set_vring_num_addr()

2019-07-31 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:46:50AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:
> The vhost_set_vring_num_addr() could be called in the middle of
> invalidate_range_start() and invalidate_range_end(). If we don't reset
> invalidate_count after the un-registering of MMU notifier, the
> invalidate_cont will run out of sync (e.g never reach zero). This will
> in fact disable the fast accessor path. Fixing by reset the count to
> zero.
> 
> Reported-by: Michael S. Tsirkin 

Did Michael report this as well?

> Fixes: 7f466032dc9e ("vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual 
> address")
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang 
>  drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 4 
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index 2a3154976277..2a7217c33668 100644
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -2073,6 +2073,10 @@ static long vhost_vring_set_num_addr(struct vhost_dev 
> *d,
>   d->has_notifier = false;
>   }
>  
> + /* reset invalidate_count in case we are in the middle of
> +  * invalidate_start() and invalidate_end().
> +  */
> + vq->invalidate_count = 0;
>   vhost_uninit_vq_maps(vq);
>  #endif
>  


[PATCH V2 4/9] vhost: reset invalidate_count in vhost_set_vring_num_addr()

2019-07-31 Thread Jason Wang
The vhost_set_vring_num_addr() could be called in the middle of
invalidate_range_start() and invalidate_range_end(). If we don't reset
invalidate_count after the un-registering of MMU notifier, the
invalidate_cont will run out of sync (e.g never reach zero). This will
in fact disable the fast accessor path. Fixing by reset the count to
zero.

Reported-by: Michael S. Tsirkin 
Fixes: 7f466032dc9e ("vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual address")
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang 
---
 drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 4 
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index 2a3154976277..2a7217c33668 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -2073,6 +2073,10 @@ static long vhost_vring_set_num_addr(struct vhost_dev *d,
d->has_notifier = false;
}
 
+   /* reset invalidate_count in case we are in the middle of
+* invalidate_start() and invalidate_end().
+*/
+   vq->invalidate_count = 0;
vhost_uninit_vq_maps(vq);
 #endif
 
-- 
2.18.1