Re: [PATCH V5 2/2] x86: IOSF: Change IOSF_MBI Kconfig to default y
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:07:29PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote: > On 2014/3/1 10:40, David E. Box wrote: > > From: "David E. Box" > > > > Make the IOSF Mailbox driver built in as it provides core functionality > > needed > > for new Intel SOC platforms to access the device registers on the SOC. > > > > Signed-off-by: David E. Box > > --- > > arch/x86/Kconfig |7 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig > > index d3b1f8b..e34b252 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig > > @@ -2385,12 +2385,9 @@ config X86_DMA_REMAP > > depends on STA2X11 > > > > config IOSF_MBI > > - bool > > + bool "Intel IOSF Mailbox Driver support" > > One concern here is, IOSF is not architectural for all of X86, can we > change this as "Intel Atom IOSF Mailbox Driver support"? Or if you can > confirm we'll use IOSF in the future onchip product, can we change this > as "Intel SOC IOSF Mailbox Driver support"? > Ok. The latter would be more appropriate. david box -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH V5 2/2] x86: IOSF: Change IOSF_MBI Kconfig to default y
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:07:29PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote: On 2014/3/1 10:40, David E. Box wrote: From: David E. Box david.e@linux.intel.com Make the IOSF Mailbox driver built in as it provides core functionality needed for new Intel SOC platforms to access the device registers on the SOC. Signed-off-by: David E. Box david.e@linux.intel.com --- arch/x86/Kconfig |7 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index d3b1f8b..e34b252 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -2385,12 +2385,9 @@ config X86_DMA_REMAP depends on STA2X11 config IOSF_MBI - bool + bool Intel IOSF Mailbox Driver support One concern here is, IOSF is not architectural for all of X86, can we change this as Intel Atom IOSF Mailbox Driver support? Or if you can confirm we'll use IOSF in the future onchip product, can we change this as Intel SOC IOSF Mailbox Driver support? Ok. The latter would be more appropriate. david box -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH V5 2/2] x86: IOSF: Change IOSF_MBI Kconfig to default y
On 2014/3/1 10:40, David E. Box wrote: > From: "David E. Box" > > Make the IOSF Mailbox driver built in as it provides core functionality needed > for new Intel SOC platforms to access the device registers on the SOC. > > Signed-off-by: David E. Box > --- > arch/x86/Kconfig |7 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig > index d3b1f8b..e34b252 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig > @@ -2385,12 +2385,9 @@ config X86_DMA_REMAP > depends on STA2X11 > > config IOSF_MBI > - bool > + bool "Intel IOSF Mailbox Driver support" One concern here is, IOSF is not architectural for all of X86, can we change this as "Intel Atom IOSF Mailbox Driver support"? Or if you can confirm we'll use IOSF in the future onchip product, can we change this as "Intel SOC IOSF Mailbox Driver support"? Better to rename the file name as well. Thanks, -Aubrey > + default y > depends on PCI > - ---help--- > - To be selected by modules requiring access to the Intel OnChip System > - Fabric (IOSF) Sideband MailBox Interface (MBI). For MBI platforms > - enumerable by PCI. > > source "net/Kconfig" > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH V5 2/2] x86: IOSF: Change IOSF_MBI Kconfig to default y
On 2014/3/1 10:40, David E. Box wrote: From: David E. Box david.e@linux.intel.com Make the IOSF Mailbox driver built in as it provides core functionality needed for new Intel SOC platforms to access the device registers on the SOC. Signed-off-by: David E. Box david.e@linux.intel.com --- arch/x86/Kconfig |7 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index d3b1f8b..e34b252 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -2385,12 +2385,9 @@ config X86_DMA_REMAP depends on STA2X11 config IOSF_MBI - bool + bool Intel IOSF Mailbox Driver support One concern here is, IOSF is not architectural for all of X86, can we change this as Intel Atom IOSF Mailbox Driver support? Or if you can confirm we'll use IOSF in the future onchip product, can we change this as Intel SOC IOSF Mailbox Driver support? Better to rename the file name as well. Thanks, -Aubrey + default y depends on PCI - ---help--- - To be selected by modules requiring access to the Intel OnChip System - Fabric (IOSF) Sideband MailBox Interface (MBI). For MBI platforms - enumerable by PCI. source net/Kconfig -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH V5 2/2] x86: IOSF: Change IOSF_MBI Kconfig to default y
From: "David E. Box" Make the IOSF Mailbox driver built in as it provides core functionality needed for new Intel SOC platforms to access the device registers on the SOC. Signed-off-by: David E. Box --- arch/x86/Kconfig |7 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index d3b1f8b..e34b252 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -2385,12 +2385,9 @@ config X86_DMA_REMAP depends on STA2X11 config IOSF_MBI - bool + bool "Intel IOSF Mailbox Driver support" + default y depends on PCI - ---help--- - To be selected by modules requiring access to the Intel OnChip System - Fabric (IOSF) Sideband MailBox Interface (MBI). For MBI platforms - enumerable by PCI. source "net/Kconfig" -- 1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH V5 2/2] x86: IOSF: Change IOSF_MBI Kconfig to default y
From: David E. Box david.e@linux.intel.com Make the IOSF Mailbox driver built in as it provides core functionality needed for new Intel SOC platforms to access the device registers on the SOC. Signed-off-by: David E. Box david.e@linux.intel.com --- arch/x86/Kconfig |7 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index d3b1f8b..e34b252 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -2385,12 +2385,9 @@ config X86_DMA_REMAP depends on STA2X11 config IOSF_MBI - bool + bool Intel IOSF Mailbox Driver support + default y depends on PCI - ---help--- - To be selected by modules requiring access to the Intel OnChip System - Fabric (IOSF) Sideband MailBox Interface (MBI). For MBI platforms - enumerable by PCI. source net/Kconfig -- 1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
