Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] bonding: use correct ether type for alb

2014-03-14 Thread David Miller
From: Veaceslav Falico 
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:41:56 +0100

> There have been reports that, while using the ETH_P_LOOP ether type
> (0x0060), the ether type is treated as its packet length.
> 
> To avoid that and to not break already existing apps - add new ether type
> ETH_P_LOOPBACK that contains the correct id - 0x9000.

Series applied, thanks Veaceslav.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] bonding: use correct ether type for alb

2014-03-14 Thread David Miller
From: Veaceslav Falico vfal...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:41:56 +0100

 There have been reports that, while using the ETH_P_LOOP ether type
 (0x0060), the ether type is treated as its packet length.
 
 To avoid that and to not break already existing apps - add new ether type
 ETH_P_LOOPBACK that contains the correct id - 0x9000.

Series applied, thanks Veaceslav.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH net-next 0/2] bonding: use correct ether type for alb

2014-03-13 Thread Veaceslav Falico
Hi,

There have been reports that, while using the ETH_P_LOOP ether type
(0x0060), the ether type is treated as its packet length.

To avoid that and to not break already existing apps - add new ether type
ETH_P_LOOPBACK that contains the correct id - 0x9000.


CC: Jay Vosburgh 
CC: Andy Gospodarek 
CC: "David S. Miller" 
CC: Stefan Richter 
CC: Simon Wunderlich 
CC: Neil Jerram 
CC: Simon Horman 
CC: Arvid Brodin 
CC: net...@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico 

---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 2 +-
 include/uapi/linux/if_ether.h  | 1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH net-next 0/2] bonding: use correct ether type for alb

2014-03-13 Thread Veaceslav Falico
Hi,

There have been reports that, while using the ETH_P_LOOP ether type
(0x0060), the ether type is treated as its packet length.

To avoid that and to not break already existing apps - add new ether type
ETH_P_LOOPBACK that contains the correct id - 0x9000.


CC: Jay Vosburgh fu...@us.ibm.com
CC: Andy Gospodarek a...@greyhouse.net
CC: David S. Miller da...@davemloft.net
CC: Stefan Richter stef...@s5r6.in-berlin.de
CC: Simon Wunderlich s...@simonwunderlich.de
CC: Neil Jerram neil.jer...@metaswitch.com
CC: Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
CC: Arvid Brodin arvid.bro...@xdin.com
CC: net...@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico vfal...@redhat.com

---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 2 +-
 include/uapi/linux/if_ether.h  | 1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/