Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] dt-bindings: net: nfc: s3fwrn5: Support a UART interface
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 04:08, Bongsu Jeon wrote: > > On 11/24/20, k...@kernel.org wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 08:39:40PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 5:02 PM k...@kernel.org wrote: > >> > > >> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 04:55:26PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote: > > > > examples: > >> > >- | > >> > > #include > >> > > @@ -71,3 +81,17 @@ examples: > >> > > wake-gpios = < 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > >> > > }; > >> > > }; > >> > > + # UART example on Raspberry Pi > >> > > + - | > >> > > + { > >> > > +status = "okay"; > >> > > + > >> > > +s3fwrn82_uart { > >> > > >> > Just "bluetooth" to follow Devicetree specification. > >> Sorry. I don't understand this comment. > >> Could you explain it? > >> Does it mean i need to refer to the net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt? > > > > The node name should be "bluetooth", not "s3fwrn82_uart", because of > > Devicetree naming convention - node names should represent generic class > > of a device. > > > Actually, RN82 is the nfc device. > So, is it okay to use the name as nfc instead of Bluetooth? Oops, of course, nfc, I don't know why the Bluetooth stuck in my mind. Best regards, Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] dt-bindings: net: nfc: s3fwrn5: Support a UART interface
On 11/24/20, k...@kernel.org wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 08:39:40PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 5:02 PM k...@kernel.org wrote: >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 04:55:26PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote: > > > examples: >> > >- | >> > > #include >> > > @@ -71,3 +81,17 @@ examples: >> > > wake-gpios = < 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; >> > > }; >> > > }; >> > > + # UART example on Raspberry Pi >> > > + - | >> > > + { >> > > +status = "okay"; >> > > + >> > > +s3fwrn82_uart { >> > >> > Just "bluetooth" to follow Devicetree specification. >> Sorry. I don't understand this comment. >> Could you explain it? >> Does it mean i need to refer to the net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt? > > The node name should be "bluetooth", not "s3fwrn82_uart", because of > Devicetree naming convention - node names should represent generic class > of a device. > Actually, RN82 is the nfc device. So, is it okay to use the name as nfc instead of Bluetooth? > Best regards, > Krzysztof > >
Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] dt-bindings: net: nfc: s3fwrn5: Support a UART interface
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 08:39:40PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 5:02 PM k...@kernel.org wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 04:55:26PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote: > > examples: > > >- | > > > #include > > > @@ -71,3 +81,17 @@ examples: > > > wake-gpios = < 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > > }; > > > }; > > > + # UART example on Raspberry Pi > > > + - | > > > + { > > > +status = "okay"; > > > + > > > +s3fwrn82_uart { > > > > Just "bluetooth" to follow Devicetree specification. > Sorry. I don't understand this comment. > Could you explain it? > Does it mean i need to refer to the net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt? The node name should be "bluetooth", not "s3fwrn82_uart", because of Devicetree naming convention - node names should represent generic class of a device. Best regards, Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] dt-bindings: net: nfc: s3fwrn5: Support a UART interface
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 5:02 PM k...@kernel.org wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 04:55:26PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote: > > Since S3FWRN82 NFC Chip, The UART interface can be used. > > S3FWRN82 supports I2C and UART interface. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon > > --- > > .../bindings/net/nfc/samsung,s3fwrn5.yaml | 28 +-- > > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/samsung,s3fwrn5.yaml > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/samsung,s3fwrn5.yaml > > index cb0b8a560282..37b3e5ae5681 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/samsung,s3fwrn5.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/samsung,s3fwrn5.yaml > > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ maintainers: > > properties: > >compatible: > > const: samsung,s3fwrn5-i2c > > +const: samsung,s3fwrn82-uart > > This does not work, you need to use enum. Did you run at least > dt_bindings_check? > Sorry. I didn't. I fixed it as below and ran dt_bindings_check. compatible: oneOf: - enum: - samsung,s3fwrn5-i2c - samsung,s3fwrn82 > The compatible should be just "samsung,s3fwrn82". I think it was a > mistake in the first s3fwrn5 submission to add a interface to > compatible. > Ok. I will change the name. > > > >en-gpios: > > maxItems: 1 > > @@ -47,10 +48,19 @@ additionalProperties: false > > required: > >- compatible > >- en-gpios > > - - interrupts > > - - reg > >- wake-gpios > > > > +allOf: > > + - if: > > + properties: > > +compatible: > > + contains: > > +const: samsung,s3fwrn5-i2c > > +then: > > + required: > > +- interrupts > > +- reg > > + > > examples: > >- | > > #include > > @@ -71,3 +81,17 @@ examples: > > wake-gpios = < 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > }; > > }; > > + # UART example on Raspberry Pi > > + - | > > + { > > +status = "okay"; > > + > > +s3fwrn82_uart { > > Just "bluetooth" to follow Devicetree specification. Sorry. I don't understand this comment. Could you explain it? Does it mean i need to refer to the net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt? > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] dt-bindings: net: nfc: s3fwrn5: Support a UART interface
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 04:55:26PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote: > Since S3FWRN82 NFC Chip, The UART interface can be used. > S3FWRN82 supports I2C and UART interface. > > Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon > --- > .../bindings/net/nfc/samsung,s3fwrn5.yaml | 28 +-- > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/samsung,s3fwrn5.yaml > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/samsung,s3fwrn5.yaml > index cb0b8a560282..37b3e5ae5681 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/samsung,s3fwrn5.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/samsung,s3fwrn5.yaml > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ maintainers: > properties: >compatible: > const: samsung,s3fwrn5-i2c > +const: samsung,s3fwrn82-uart This does not work, you need to use enum. Did you run at least dt_bindings_check? The compatible should be just "samsung,s3fwrn82". I think it was a mistake in the first s3fwrn5 submission to add a interface to compatible. > >en-gpios: > maxItems: 1 > @@ -47,10 +48,19 @@ additionalProperties: false > required: >- compatible >- en-gpios > - - interrupts > - - reg >- wake-gpios > > +allOf: > + - if: > + properties: > +compatible: > + contains: > +const: samsung,s3fwrn5-i2c > +then: > + required: > +- interrupts > +- reg > + > examples: >- | > #include > @@ -71,3 +81,17 @@ examples: > wake-gpios = < 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > }; > }; > + # UART example on Raspberry Pi > + - | > + { > +status = "okay"; > + > +s3fwrn82_uart { Just "bluetooth" to follow Devicetree specification. Best regards, Krzysztof
[PATCH net-next 1/2] dt-bindings: net: nfc: s3fwrn5: Support a UART interface
Since S3FWRN82 NFC Chip, The UART interface can be used. S3FWRN82 supports I2C and UART interface. Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon --- .../bindings/net/nfc/samsung,s3fwrn5.yaml | 28 +-- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/samsung,s3fwrn5.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/samsung,s3fwrn5.yaml index cb0b8a560282..37b3e5ae5681 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/samsung,s3fwrn5.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/samsung,s3fwrn5.yaml @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ maintainers: properties: compatible: const: samsung,s3fwrn5-i2c +const: samsung,s3fwrn82-uart en-gpios: maxItems: 1 @@ -47,10 +48,19 @@ additionalProperties: false required: - compatible - en-gpios - - interrupts - - reg - wake-gpios +allOf: + - if: + properties: +compatible: + contains: +const: samsung,s3fwrn5-i2c +then: + required: +- interrupts +- reg + examples: - | #include @@ -71,3 +81,17 @@ examples: wake-gpios = < 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; }; }; + # UART example on Raspberry Pi + - | + { +status = "okay"; + +s3fwrn82_uart { +compatible = "samsung,s3fwrn82-uart"; + +en-gpios = < 20 0>; +wake-gpios = < 16 0>; + +status = "okay"; +}; +}; -- 2.17.1