Re: [PATCH v2] clear file privilege bits when mmap writing
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Jan Kara wrote: > On Mon 07-12-15 16:40:14, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:45 PM, yalin wang >> > wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Dec 2, 2015, at 16:03, Kees Cook wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Normally, when a user can modify a file that has setuid or setgid bits, >> >>> those bits are cleared when they are not the file owner or a member >> >>> of the group. This is enforced when using write and truncate but not >> >>> when writing to a shared mmap on the file. This could allow the file >> >>> writer to gain privileges by changing a binary without losing the >> >>> setuid/setgid/caps bits. >> >>> >> >>> Changing the bits requires holding inode->i_mutex, so it cannot be done >> >>> during the page fault (due to mmap_sem being held during the fault). >> >>> Instead, clear the bits if PROT_WRITE is being used at mmap time. >> >>> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook >> >>> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org >> >>> — >> >> >> >> is this means mprotect() sys call also need add this check? >> >> mprotect() can change to PROT_WRITE, then it can write to a >> >> read only map again , also a secure hole here . >> > >> > Yes, good point. This needs to be added. I will send a new patch. Thanks! >> >> This continues to look worse and worse. >> >> So... to check this at mprotect time, I have to know it's MAP_SHARED, >> but that's in the vma_flags, which I can only see after holding >> mmap_sem. >> >> The best I can think of now is to strip the bits at munmap time, since >> you can't execute an mmapped file until it closes. >> >> Jan, thoughts on this? > > Umm, so we actually refuse to execute a file while someone has it open for > writing (deny_write_access() in do_open_execat()). So dropping the suid / > sgid bits when closing file for writing could be plausible. Grabbing > i_mutex from __fput() context is safe (it gets called from task_work > context when returning to userspace). > > That way we could actually remove the checks done for each write. To avoid > unexpected removal of suid/sgid bits when someone just opens & closes the > file, we could mark the file as needing suid/sgid treatment by a flag in > inode->i_flags when file gets written to or mmaped and then check for this > in __fput(). Yeah, this is ultimately where I ended up for the v4 (and fixed up in v5). I added the flag to file, though, not inode. Sending v5 now... -Kees > > I've added Al Viro to CC just in case he is aware of some issues with > this... > > Honza > -- > Jan Kara > SUSE Labs, CR -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2] clear file privilege bits when mmap writing
On Mon 07-12-15 16:40:14, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:45 PM, yalin wang wrote: > >> > >>> On Dec 2, 2015, at 16:03, Kees Cook wrote: > >>> > >>> Normally, when a user can modify a file that has setuid or setgid bits, > >>> those bits are cleared when they are not the file owner or a member > >>> of the group. This is enforced when using write and truncate but not > >>> when writing to a shared mmap on the file. This could allow the file > >>> writer to gain privileges by changing a binary without losing the > >>> setuid/setgid/caps bits. > >>> > >>> Changing the bits requires holding inode->i_mutex, so it cannot be done > >>> during the page fault (due to mmap_sem being held during the fault). > >>> Instead, clear the bits if PROT_WRITE is being used at mmap time. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > >>> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org > >>> — > >> > >> is this means mprotect() sys call also need add this check? > >> mprotect() can change to PROT_WRITE, then it can write to a > >> read only map again , also a secure hole here . > > > > Yes, good point. This needs to be added. I will send a new patch. Thanks! > > This continues to look worse and worse. > > So... to check this at mprotect time, I have to know it's MAP_SHARED, > but that's in the vma_flags, which I can only see after holding > mmap_sem. > > The best I can think of now is to strip the bits at munmap time, since > you can't execute an mmapped file until it closes. > > Jan, thoughts on this? Umm, so we actually refuse to execute a file while someone has it open for writing (deny_write_access() in do_open_execat()). So dropping the suid / sgid bits when closing file for writing could be plausible. Grabbing i_mutex from __fput() context is safe (it gets called from task_work context when returning to userspace). That way we could actually remove the checks done for each write. To avoid unexpected removal of suid/sgid bits when someone just opens & closes the file, we could mark the file as needing suid/sgid treatment by a flag in inode->i_flags when file gets written to or mmaped and then check for this in __fput(). I've added Al Viro to CC just in case he is aware of some issues with this... Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2] clear file privilege bits when mmap writing
On Mon 07-12-15 16:40:14, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Kees Cookwrote: > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:45 PM, yalin wang wrote: > >> > >>> On Dec 2, 2015, at 16:03, Kees Cook wrote: > >>> > >>> Normally, when a user can modify a file that has setuid or setgid bits, > >>> those bits are cleared when they are not the file owner or a member > >>> of the group. This is enforced when using write and truncate but not > >>> when writing to a shared mmap on the file. This could allow the file > >>> writer to gain privileges by changing a binary without losing the > >>> setuid/setgid/caps bits. > >>> > >>> Changing the bits requires holding inode->i_mutex, so it cannot be done > >>> during the page fault (due to mmap_sem being held during the fault). > >>> Instead, clear the bits if PROT_WRITE is being used at mmap time. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > >>> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org > >>> — > >> > >> is this means mprotect() sys call also need add this check? > >> mprotect() can change to PROT_WRITE, then it can write to a > >> read only map again , also a secure hole here . > > > > Yes, good point. This needs to be added. I will send a new patch. Thanks! > > This continues to look worse and worse. > > So... to check this at mprotect time, I have to know it's MAP_SHARED, > but that's in the vma_flags, which I can only see after holding > mmap_sem. > > The best I can think of now is to strip the bits at munmap time, since > you can't execute an mmapped file until it closes. > > Jan, thoughts on this? Umm, so we actually refuse to execute a file while someone has it open for writing (deny_write_access() in do_open_execat()). So dropping the suid / sgid bits when closing file for writing could be plausible. Grabbing i_mutex from __fput() context is safe (it gets called from task_work context when returning to userspace). That way we could actually remove the checks done for each write. To avoid unexpected removal of suid/sgid bits when someone just opens & closes the file, we could mark the file as needing suid/sgid treatment by a flag in inode->i_flags when file gets written to or mmaped and then check for this in __fput(). I've added Al Viro to CC just in case he is aware of some issues with this... Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2] clear file privilege bits when mmap writing
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Jan Karawrote: > On Mon 07-12-15 16:40:14, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:45 PM, yalin wang >> > wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Dec 2, 2015, at 16:03, Kees Cook wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Normally, when a user can modify a file that has setuid or setgid bits, >> >>> those bits are cleared when they are not the file owner or a member >> >>> of the group. This is enforced when using write and truncate but not >> >>> when writing to a shared mmap on the file. This could allow the file >> >>> writer to gain privileges by changing a binary without losing the >> >>> setuid/setgid/caps bits. >> >>> >> >>> Changing the bits requires holding inode->i_mutex, so it cannot be done >> >>> during the page fault (due to mmap_sem being held during the fault). >> >>> Instead, clear the bits if PROT_WRITE is being used at mmap time. >> >>> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook >> >>> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org >> >>> — >> >> >> >> is this means mprotect() sys call also need add this check? >> >> mprotect() can change to PROT_WRITE, then it can write to a >> >> read only map again , also a secure hole here . >> > >> > Yes, good point. This needs to be added. I will send a new patch. Thanks! >> >> This continues to look worse and worse. >> >> So... to check this at mprotect time, I have to know it's MAP_SHARED, >> but that's in the vma_flags, which I can only see after holding >> mmap_sem. >> >> The best I can think of now is to strip the bits at munmap time, since >> you can't execute an mmapped file until it closes. >> >> Jan, thoughts on this? > > Umm, so we actually refuse to execute a file while someone has it open for > writing (deny_write_access() in do_open_execat()). So dropping the suid / > sgid bits when closing file for writing could be plausible. Grabbing > i_mutex from __fput() context is safe (it gets called from task_work > context when returning to userspace). > > That way we could actually remove the checks done for each write. To avoid > unexpected removal of suid/sgid bits when someone just opens & closes the > file, we could mark the file as needing suid/sgid treatment by a flag in > inode->i_flags when file gets written to or mmaped and then check for this > in __fput(). Yeah, this is ultimately where I ended up for the v4 (and fixed up in v5). I added the flag to file, though, not inode. Sending v5 now... -Kees > > I've added Al Viro to CC just in case he is aware of some issues with > this... > > Honza > -- > Jan Kara > SUSE Labs, CR -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2] clear file privilege bits when mmap writing
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:45 PM, yalin wang wrote: >> >>> On Dec 2, 2015, at 16:03, Kees Cook wrote: >>> >>> Normally, when a user can modify a file that has setuid or setgid bits, >>> those bits are cleared when they are not the file owner or a member >>> of the group. This is enforced when using write and truncate but not >>> when writing to a shared mmap on the file. This could allow the file >>> writer to gain privileges by changing a binary without losing the >>> setuid/setgid/caps bits. >>> >>> Changing the bits requires holding inode->i_mutex, so it cannot be done >>> during the page fault (due to mmap_sem being held during the fault). >>> Instead, clear the bits if PROT_WRITE is being used at mmap time. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook >>> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org >>> — >> >> is this means mprotect() sys call also need add this check? >> mprotect() can change to PROT_WRITE, then it can write to a >> read only map again , also a secure hole here . > > Yes, good point. This needs to be added. I will send a new patch. Thanks! This continues to look worse and worse. So... to check this at mprotect time, I have to know it's MAP_SHARED, but that's in the vma_flags, which I can only see after holding mmap_sem. The best I can think of now is to strip the bits at munmap time, since you can't execute an mmapped file until it closes. Jan, thoughts on this? -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2] clear file privilege bits when mmap writing
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:45 PM, yalin wang wrote: > >> On Dec 2, 2015, at 16:03, Kees Cook wrote: >> >> Normally, when a user can modify a file that has setuid or setgid bits, >> those bits are cleared when they are not the file owner or a member >> of the group. This is enforced when using write and truncate but not >> when writing to a shared mmap on the file. This could allow the file >> writer to gain privileges by changing a binary without losing the >> setuid/setgid/caps bits. >> >> Changing the bits requires holding inode->i_mutex, so it cannot be done >> during the page fault (due to mmap_sem being held during the fault). >> Instead, clear the bits if PROT_WRITE is being used at mmap time. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook >> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org >> — > > is this means mprotect() sys call also need add this check? > mprotect() can change to PROT_WRITE, then it can write to a > read only map again , also a secure hole here . Yes, good point. This needs to be added. I will send a new patch. Thanks! -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2] clear file privilege bits when mmap writing
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:45 PM, yalin wangwrote: > >> On Dec 2, 2015, at 16:03, Kees Cook wrote: >> >> Normally, when a user can modify a file that has setuid or setgid bits, >> those bits are cleared when they are not the file owner or a member >> of the group. This is enforced when using write and truncate but not >> when writing to a shared mmap on the file. This could allow the file >> writer to gain privileges by changing a binary without losing the >> setuid/setgid/caps bits. >> >> Changing the bits requires holding inode->i_mutex, so it cannot be done >> during the page fault (due to mmap_sem being held during the fault). >> Instead, clear the bits if PROT_WRITE is being used at mmap time. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook >> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org >> — > > is this means mprotect() sys call also need add this check? > mprotect() can change to PROT_WRITE, then it can write to a > read only map again , also a secure hole here . Yes, good point. This needs to be added. I will send a new patch. Thanks! -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2] clear file privilege bits when mmap writing
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Kees Cookwrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:45 PM, yalin wang wrote: >> >>> On Dec 2, 2015, at 16:03, Kees Cook wrote: >>> >>> Normally, when a user can modify a file that has setuid or setgid bits, >>> those bits are cleared when they are not the file owner or a member >>> of the group. This is enforced when using write and truncate but not >>> when writing to a shared mmap on the file. This could allow the file >>> writer to gain privileges by changing a binary without losing the >>> setuid/setgid/caps bits. >>> >>> Changing the bits requires holding inode->i_mutex, so it cannot be done >>> during the page fault (due to mmap_sem being held during the fault). >>> Instead, clear the bits if PROT_WRITE is being used at mmap time. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook >>> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org >>> — >> >> is this means mprotect() sys call also need add this check? >> mprotect() can change to PROT_WRITE, then it can write to a >> read only map again , also a secure hole here . > > Yes, good point. This needs to be added. I will send a new patch. Thanks! This continues to look worse and worse. So... to check this at mprotect time, I have to know it's MAP_SHARED, but that's in the vma_flags, which I can only see after holding mmap_sem. The best I can think of now is to strip the bits at munmap time, since you can't execute an mmapped file until it closes. Jan, thoughts on this? -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2] clear file privilege bits when mmap writing
> On Dec 2, 2015, at 16:03, Kees Cook wrote: > > Normally, when a user can modify a file that has setuid or setgid bits, > those bits are cleared when they are not the file owner or a member > of the group. This is enforced when using write and truncate but not > when writing to a shared mmap on the file. This could allow the file > writer to gain privileges by changing a binary without losing the > setuid/setgid/caps bits. > > Changing the bits requires holding inode->i_mutex, so it cannot be done > during the page fault (due to mmap_sem being held during the fault). > Instead, clear the bits if PROT_WRITE is being used at mmap time. > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org > — is this means mprotect() sys call also need add this check? mprotect() can change to PROT_WRITE, then it can write to a read only map again , also a secure hole here . Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v2] clear file privilege bits when mmap writing
> On Dec 2, 2015, at 16:03, Kees Cookwrote: > > Normally, when a user can modify a file that has setuid or setgid bits, > those bits are cleared when they are not the file owner or a member > of the group. This is enforced when using write and truncate but not > when writing to a shared mmap on the file. This could allow the file > writer to gain privileges by changing a binary without losing the > setuid/setgid/caps bits. > > Changing the bits requires holding inode->i_mutex, so it cannot be done > during the page fault (due to mmap_sem being held during the fault). > Instead, clear the bits if PROT_WRITE is being used at mmap time. > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org > — is this means mprotect() sys call also need add this check? mprotect() can change to PROT_WRITE, then it can write to a read only map again , also a secure hole here . Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/