Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: Add debugfs support
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 09:37:32PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:56:13AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:33:54AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Vinod Koulwrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:07:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > > > > why fail, debugfs should be an optional thingy, why would you want to > > > > fail here? > > > > > > Yes, we are handling the case when debugfs is not available > > > and skipping debugfs gracefully. > > > > > > If debugfs is available then failure of debugfs_create_dir() > > > should be reported. > > > > reported yes, bailing out on that err no.. > > Reported, no. You should _never_ care about the return value of a > debugfs call. Never check it, just move on ad keep on going. It > doesn't matter. Agreed that makes more sense. The driver was checking and bailing out, I advised against that :) -- ~Vinod
Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: Add debugfs support
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 09:37:32PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:56:13AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:33:54AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:07:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > > > > why fail, debugfs should be an optional thingy, why would you want to > > > > fail here? > > > > > > Yes, we are handling the case when debugfs is not available > > > and skipping debugfs gracefully. > > > > > > If debugfs is available then failure of debugfs_create_dir() > > > should be reported. > > > > reported yes, bailing out on that err no.. > > Reported, no. You should _never_ care about the return value of a > debugfs call. Never check it, just move on ad keep on going. It > doesn't matter. Agreed that makes more sense. The driver was checking and bailing out, I advised against that :) -- ~Vinod
Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: Add debugfs support
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:56:13AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:33:54AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Vinod Koulwrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:07:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > > > why fail, debugfs should be an optional thingy, why would you want to > > > fail here? > > > > Yes, we are handling the case when debugfs is not available > > and skipping debugfs gracefully. > > > > If debugfs is available then failure of debugfs_create_dir() > > should be reported. > > reported yes, bailing out on that err no.. Reported, no. You should _never_ care about the return value of a debugfs call. Never check it, just move on ad keep on going. It doesn't matter. thanks, greg k-h
Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: Add debugfs support
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:56:13AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:33:54AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:07:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > > > why fail, debugfs should be an optional thingy, why would you want to > > > fail here? > > > > Yes, we are handling the case when debugfs is not available > > and skipping debugfs gracefully. > > > > If debugfs is available then failure of debugfs_create_dir() > > should be reported. > > reported yes, bailing out on that err no.. Reported, no. You should _never_ care about the return value of a debugfs call. Never check it, just move on ad keep on going. It doesn't matter. thanks, greg k-h
Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: Add debugfs support
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Vinod Koulwrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:33:54AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:07:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: >> > why fail, debugfs should be an optional thingy, why would you want to fail >> > here? >> >> Yes, we are handling the case when debugfs is not available >> and skipping debugfs gracefully. >> >> If debugfs is available then failure of debugfs_create_dir() >> should be reported. > > reported yes, bailing out on that err no.. OK, I will put dev_err() instead of bailing out. Regards, Anup
Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: Add debugfs support
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:33:54AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:07:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: >> > why fail, debugfs should be an optional thingy, why would you want to fail >> > here? >> >> Yes, we are handling the case when debugfs is not available >> and skipping debugfs gracefully. >> >> If debugfs is available then failure of debugfs_create_dir() >> should be reported. > > reported yes, bailing out on that err no.. OK, I will put dev_err() instead of bailing out. Regards, Anup
Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: Add debugfs support
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:33:54AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Vinod Koulwrote: > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:07:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > > why fail, debugfs should be an optional thingy, why would you want to fail > > here? > > Yes, we are handling the case when debugfs is not available > and skipping debugfs gracefully. > > If debugfs is available then failure of debugfs_create_dir() > should be reported. reported yes, bailing out on that err no.. -- ~Vinod
Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: Add debugfs support
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:33:54AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:07:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > > why fail, debugfs should be an optional thingy, why would you want to fail > > here? > > Yes, we are handling the case when debugfs is not available > and skipping debugfs gracefully. > > If debugfs is available then failure of debugfs_create_dir() > should be reported. reported yes, bailing out on that err no.. -- ~Vinod
Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: Add debugfs support
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Vinod Koulwrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:07:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: >> This patch adds debugfs support to report stats via debugfs >> which in-turn will help debug hang or error situations. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel >> Reviewed-by: Ray Jui >> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden >> --- >> drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c | 82 >> +- >> 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c >> index f0a0e80..f9d110c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c >> +++ b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c >> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ >> */ >> >> #include >> +#include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> @@ -162,6 +163,9 @@ struct sba_device { >> struct list_head reqs_completed_list; >> struct list_head reqs_aborted_list; >> struct list_head reqs_free_list; >> + /* DebugFS directory entries */ >> + struct dentry *root; >> + struct dentry *stats; >> }; >> >> /* == Command helper routines = */ >> @@ -486,6 +490,45 @@ static void sba_process_received_request(struct >> sba_device *sba, >> } >> } >> >> +static void sba_write_stats_in_seqfile(struct sba_device *sba, >> +struct seq_file *file) >> +{ >> + unsigned long flags; >> + struct sba_request *req; >> + u32 free_count = 0, alloced_count = 0, pending_count = 0; >> + u32 active_count = 0, aborted_count = 0, completed_count = 0; >> + >> + spin_lock_irqsave(>reqs_lock, flags); >> + >> + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_free_list, node) >> + free_count++; >> + >> + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_alloc_list, node) >> + alloced_count++; >> + >> + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_pending_list, node) >> + pending_count++; >> + >> + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_active_list, node) >> + active_count++; >> + >> + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_aborted_list, node) >> + aborted_count++; >> + >> + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_completed_list, node) >> + completed_count++; >> + >> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(>reqs_lock, flags); >> + >> + seq_printf(file, "maximum requests = %d\n", sba->max_req); >> + seq_printf(file, "free requests = %d\n", free_count); >> + seq_printf(file, "alloced requests = %d\n", alloced_count); >> + seq_printf(file, "pending requests = %d\n", pending_count); >> + seq_printf(file, "active requests= %d\n", active_count); >> + seq_printf(file, "aborted requests = %d\n", aborted_count); >> + seq_printf(file, "completed requests = %d\n", completed_count); >> +} >> + >> /* == DMAENGINE callbacks = */ >> >> static void sba_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *dchan) >> @@ -1451,6 +1494,19 @@ static void sba_receive_message(struct mbox_client >> *cl, void *msg) >> sba_process_received_request(sba, req); >> } >> >> +/* == Debugfs callbacks == */ >> + >> +static int sba_debugfs_stats_show(struct seq_file *file, void *offset) >> +{ >> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(file->private); >> + struct sba_device *sba = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); >> + >> + /* Write stats in file */ >> + sba_write_stats_in_seqfile(sba, file); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> /* == Platform driver routines = */ >> >> static int sba_prealloc_channel_resources(struct sba_device *sba) >> @@ -1721,10 +1777,30 @@ static int sba_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> if (ret) >> goto fail_free_mchans; >> >> + /* Check availability of debugfs */ >> + if (!debugfs_initialized()) >> + goto skip_debugfs; >> + >> + /* Create debugfs root entry */ >> + sba->root = debugfs_create_dir(dev_name(sba->dev), NULL); >> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sba->root)) { >> + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(sba->root); >> + goto fail_free_resources; > > why fail, debugfs should be an optional thingy, why would you want to fail > here? Yes, we are handling the case when debugfs is not available and skipping debugfs gracefully. If debugfs is available then failure of debugfs_create_dir() should be reported. Regards, Anup
Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: Add debugfs support
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:07:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: >> This patch adds debugfs support to report stats via debugfs >> which in-turn will help debug hang or error situations. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel >> Reviewed-by: Ray Jui >> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden >> --- >> drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c | 82 >> +- >> 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c >> index f0a0e80..f9d110c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c >> +++ b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c >> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ >> */ >> >> #include >> +#include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> @@ -162,6 +163,9 @@ struct sba_device { >> struct list_head reqs_completed_list; >> struct list_head reqs_aborted_list; >> struct list_head reqs_free_list; >> + /* DebugFS directory entries */ >> + struct dentry *root; >> + struct dentry *stats; >> }; >> >> /* == Command helper routines = */ >> @@ -486,6 +490,45 @@ static void sba_process_received_request(struct >> sba_device *sba, >> } >> } >> >> +static void sba_write_stats_in_seqfile(struct sba_device *sba, >> +struct seq_file *file) >> +{ >> + unsigned long flags; >> + struct sba_request *req; >> + u32 free_count = 0, alloced_count = 0, pending_count = 0; >> + u32 active_count = 0, aborted_count = 0, completed_count = 0; >> + >> + spin_lock_irqsave(>reqs_lock, flags); >> + >> + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_free_list, node) >> + free_count++; >> + >> + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_alloc_list, node) >> + alloced_count++; >> + >> + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_pending_list, node) >> + pending_count++; >> + >> + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_active_list, node) >> + active_count++; >> + >> + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_aborted_list, node) >> + aborted_count++; >> + >> + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_completed_list, node) >> + completed_count++; >> + >> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(>reqs_lock, flags); >> + >> + seq_printf(file, "maximum requests = %d\n", sba->max_req); >> + seq_printf(file, "free requests = %d\n", free_count); >> + seq_printf(file, "alloced requests = %d\n", alloced_count); >> + seq_printf(file, "pending requests = %d\n", pending_count); >> + seq_printf(file, "active requests= %d\n", active_count); >> + seq_printf(file, "aborted requests = %d\n", aborted_count); >> + seq_printf(file, "completed requests = %d\n", completed_count); >> +} >> + >> /* == DMAENGINE callbacks = */ >> >> static void sba_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *dchan) >> @@ -1451,6 +1494,19 @@ static void sba_receive_message(struct mbox_client >> *cl, void *msg) >> sba_process_received_request(sba, req); >> } >> >> +/* == Debugfs callbacks == */ >> + >> +static int sba_debugfs_stats_show(struct seq_file *file, void *offset) >> +{ >> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(file->private); >> + struct sba_device *sba = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); >> + >> + /* Write stats in file */ >> + sba_write_stats_in_seqfile(sba, file); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> /* == Platform driver routines = */ >> >> static int sba_prealloc_channel_resources(struct sba_device *sba) >> @@ -1721,10 +1777,30 @@ static int sba_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> if (ret) >> goto fail_free_mchans; >> >> + /* Check availability of debugfs */ >> + if (!debugfs_initialized()) >> + goto skip_debugfs; >> + >> + /* Create debugfs root entry */ >> + sba->root = debugfs_create_dir(dev_name(sba->dev), NULL); >> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sba->root)) { >> + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(sba->root); >> + goto fail_free_resources; > > why fail, debugfs should be an optional thingy, why would you want to fail > here? Yes, we are handling the case when debugfs is not available and skipping debugfs gracefully. If debugfs is available then failure of debugfs_create_dir() should be reported. Regards, Anup
Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: Add debugfs support
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:07:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > This patch adds debugfs support to report stats via debugfs > which in-turn will help debug hang or error situations. > > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel> Reviewed-by: Ray Jui > Reviewed-by: Scott Branden > --- > drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c | 82 > +- > 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c > index f0a0e80..f9d110c 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ > */ > > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -162,6 +163,9 @@ struct sba_device { > struct list_head reqs_completed_list; > struct list_head reqs_aborted_list; > struct list_head reqs_free_list; > + /* DebugFS directory entries */ > + struct dentry *root; > + struct dentry *stats; > }; > > /* == Command helper routines = */ > @@ -486,6 +490,45 @@ static void sba_process_received_request(struct > sba_device *sba, > } > } > > +static void sba_write_stats_in_seqfile(struct sba_device *sba, > +struct seq_file *file) > +{ > + unsigned long flags; > + struct sba_request *req; > + u32 free_count = 0, alloced_count = 0, pending_count = 0; > + u32 active_count = 0, aborted_count = 0, completed_count = 0; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(>reqs_lock, flags); > + > + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_free_list, node) > + free_count++; > + > + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_alloc_list, node) > + alloced_count++; > + > + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_pending_list, node) > + pending_count++; > + > + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_active_list, node) > + active_count++; > + > + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_aborted_list, node) > + aborted_count++; > + > + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_completed_list, node) > + completed_count++; > + > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(>reqs_lock, flags); > + > + seq_printf(file, "maximum requests = %d\n", sba->max_req); > + seq_printf(file, "free requests = %d\n", free_count); > + seq_printf(file, "alloced requests = %d\n", alloced_count); > + seq_printf(file, "pending requests = %d\n", pending_count); > + seq_printf(file, "active requests= %d\n", active_count); > + seq_printf(file, "aborted requests = %d\n", aborted_count); > + seq_printf(file, "completed requests = %d\n", completed_count); > +} > + > /* == DMAENGINE callbacks = */ > > static void sba_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *dchan) > @@ -1451,6 +1494,19 @@ static void sba_receive_message(struct mbox_client > *cl, void *msg) > sba_process_received_request(sba, req); > } > > +/* == Debugfs callbacks == */ > + > +static int sba_debugfs_stats_show(struct seq_file *file, void *offset) > +{ > + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(file->private); > + struct sba_device *sba = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + > + /* Write stats in file */ > + sba_write_stats_in_seqfile(sba, file); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > /* == Platform driver routines = */ > > static int sba_prealloc_channel_resources(struct sba_device *sba) > @@ -1721,10 +1777,30 @@ static int sba_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (ret) > goto fail_free_mchans; > > + /* Check availability of debugfs */ > + if (!debugfs_initialized()) > + goto skip_debugfs; > + > + /* Create debugfs root entry */ > + sba->root = debugfs_create_dir(dev_name(sba->dev), NULL); > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sba->root)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(sba->root); > + goto fail_free_resources; why fail, debugfs should be an optional thingy, why would you want to fail here? -- ~Vinod
Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: Add debugfs support
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:07:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > This patch adds debugfs support to report stats via debugfs > which in-turn will help debug hang or error situations. > > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel > Reviewed-by: Ray Jui > Reviewed-by: Scott Branden > --- > drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c | 82 > +- > 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c > index f0a0e80..f9d110c 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ > */ > > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -162,6 +163,9 @@ struct sba_device { > struct list_head reqs_completed_list; > struct list_head reqs_aborted_list; > struct list_head reqs_free_list; > + /* DebugFS directory entries */ > + struct dentry *root; > + struct dentry *stats; > }; > > /* == Command helper routines = */ > @@ -486,6 +490,45 @@ static void sba_process_received_request(struct > sba_device *sba, > } > } > > +static void sba_write_stats_in_seqfile(struct sba_device *sba, > +struct seq_file *file) > +{ > + unsigned long flags; > + struct sba_request *req; > + u32 free_count = 0, alloced_count = 0, pending_count = 0; > + u32 active_count = 0, aborted_count = 0, completed_count = 0; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(>reqs_lock, flags); > + > + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_free_list, node) > + free_count++; > + > + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_alloc_list, node) > + alloced_count++; > + > + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_pending_list, node) > + pending_count++; > + > + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_active_list, node) > + active_count++; > + > + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_aborted_list, node) > + aborted_count++; > + > + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_completed_list, node) > + completed_count++; > + > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(>reqs_lock, flags); > + > + seq_printf(file, "maximum requests = %d\n", sba->max_req); > + seq_printf(file, "free requests = %d\n", free_count); > + seq_printf(file, "alloced requests = %d\n", alloced_count); > + seq_printf(file, "pending requests = %d\n", pending_count); > + seq_printf(file, "active requests= %d\n", active_count); > + seq_printf(file, "aborted requests = %d\n", aborted_count); > + seq_printf(file, "completed requests = %d\n", completed_count); > +} > + > /* == DMAENGINE callbacks = */ > > static void sba_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *dchan) > @@ -1451,6 +1494,19 @@ static void sba_receive_message(struct mbox_client > *cl, void *msg) > sba_process_received_request(sba, req); > } > > +/* == Debugfs callbacks == */ > + > +static int sba_debugfs_stats_show(struct seq_file *file, void *offset) > +{ > + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(file->private); > + struct sba_device *sba = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + > + /* Write stats in file */ > + sba_write_stats_in_seqfile(sba, file); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > /* == Platform driver routines = */ > > static int sba_prealloc_channel_resources(struct sba_device *sba) > @@ -1721,10 +1777,30 @@ static int sba_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (ret) > goto fail_free_mchans; > > + /* Check availability of debugfs */ > + if (!debugfs_initialized()) > + goto skip_debugfs; > + > + /* Create debugfs root entry */ > + sba->root = debugfs_create_dir(dev_name(sba->dev), NULL); > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sba->root)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(sba->root); > + goto fail_free_resources; why fail, debugfs should be an optional thingy, why would you want to fail here? -- ~Vinod
[PATCH v2 15/16] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: Add debugfs support
This patch adds debugfs support to report stats via debugfs which in-turn will help debug hang or error situations. Signed-off-by: Anup PatelReviewed-by: Ray Jui Reviewed-by: Scott Branden --- drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c | 82 +- 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c index f0a0e80..f9d110c 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c +++ b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ */ #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -162,6 +163,9 @@ struct sba_device { struct list_head reqs_completed_list; struct list_head reqs_aborted_list; struct list_head reqs_free_list; + /* DebugFS directory entries */ + struct dentry *root; + struct dentry *stats; }; /* == Command helper routines = */ @@ -486,6 +490,45 @@ static void sba_process_received_request(struct sba_device *sba, } } +static void sba_write_stats_in_seqfile(struct sba_device *sba, + struct seq_file *file) +{ + unsigned long flags; + struct sba_request *req; + u32 free_count = 0, alloced_count = 0, pending_count = 0; + u32 active_count = 0, aborted_count = 0, completed_count = 0; + + spin_lock_irqsave(>reqs_lock, flags); + + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_free_list, node) + free_count++; + + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_alloc_list, node) + alloced_count++; + + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_pending_list, node) + pending_count++; + + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_active_list, node) + active_count++; + + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_aborted_list, node) + aborted_count++; + + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_completed_list, node) + completed_count++; + + spin_unlock_irqrestore(>reqs_lock, flags); + + seq_printf(file, "maximum requests = %d\n", sba->max_req); + seq_printf(file, "free requests = %d\n", free_count); + seq_printf(file, "alloced requests = %d\n", alloced_count); + seq_printf(file, "pending requests = %d\n", pending_count); + seq_printf(file, "active requests= %d\n", active_count); + seq_printf(file, "aborted requests = %d\n", aborted_count); + seq_printf(file, "completed requests = %d\n", completed_count); +} + /* == DMAENGINE callbacks = */ static void sba_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *dchan) @@ -1451,6 +1494,19 @@ static void sba_receive_message(struct mbox_client *cl, void *msg) sba_process_received_request(sba, req); } +/* == Debugfs callbacks == */ + +static int sba_debugfs_stats_show(struct seq_file *file, void *offset) +{ + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(file->private); + struct sba_device *sba = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + + /* Write stats in file */ + sba_write_stats_in_seqfile(sba, file); + + return 0; +} + /* == Platform driver routines = */ static int sba_prealloc_channel_resources(struct sba_device *sba) @@ -1721,10 +1777,30 @@ static int sba_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (ret) goto fail_free_mchans; + /* Check availability of debugfs */ + if (!debugfs_initialized()) + goto skip_debugfs; + + /* Create debugfs root entry */ + sba->root = debugfs_create_dir(dev_name(sba->dev), NULL); + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sba->root)) { + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(sba->root); + goto fail_free_resources; + } + + /* Create debugfs stats entry */ + sba->stats = debugfs_create_devm_seqfile(sba->dev, "stats", sba->root, +sba_debugfs_stats_show); + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sba->stats)) { + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(sba->stats); + goto fail_free_debugfs_root; + } +skip_debugfs: + /* Register DMA device with Linux async framework */ ret = sba_async_register(sba); if (ret) - goto fail_free_resources; + goto fail_free_debugfs_root; /* Print device info */ dev_info(sba->dev, "%s using SBAv%d and %d mailbox channels", @@ -1733,6 +1809,8 @@ static int sba_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return 0; +fail_free_debugfs_root: + debugfs_remove_recursive(sba->root); fail_free_resources: sba_freeup_channel_resources(sba); fail_free_mchans: @@ -1748,6 +1826,8 @@ static int sba_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) dma_async_device_unregister(>dma_dev); + debugfs_remove_recursive(sba->root); + sba_freeup_channel_resources(sba); for (i = 0; i < sba->mchans_count; i++) -- 2.7.4
[PATCH v2 15/16] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: Add debugfs support
This patch adds debugfs support to report stats via debugfs which in-turn will help debug hang or error situations. Signed-off-by: Anup Patel Reviewed-by: Ray Jui Reviewed-by: Scott Branden --- drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c | 82 +- 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c index f0a0e80..f9d110c 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c +++ b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ */ #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -162,6 +163,9 @@ struct sba_device { struct list_head reqs_completed_list; struct list_head reqs_aborted_list; struct list_head reqs_free_list; + /* DebugFS directory entries */ + struct dentry *root; + struct dentry *stats; }; /* == Command helper routines = */ @@ -486,6 +490,45 @@ static void sba_process_received_request(struct sba_device *sba, } } +static void sba_write_stats_in_seqfile(struct sba_device *sba, + struct seq_file *file) +{ + unsigned long flags; + struct sba_request *req; + u32 free_count = 0, alloced_count = 0, pending_count = 0; + u32 active_count = 0, aborted_count = 0, completed_count = 0; + + spin_lock_irqsave(>reqs_lock, flags); + + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_free_list, node) + free_count++; + + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_alloc_list, node) + alloced_count++; + + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_pending_list, node) + pending_count++; + + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_active_list, node) + active_count++; + + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_aborted_list, node) + aborted_count++; + + list_for_each_entry(req, >reqs_completed_list, node) + completed_count++; + + spin_unlock_irqrestore(>reqs_lock, flags); + + seq_printf(file, "maximum requests = %d\n", sba->max_req); + seq_printf(file, "free requests = %d\n", free_count); + seq_printf(file, "alloced requests = %d\n", alloced_count); + seq_printf(file, "pending requests = %d\n", pending_count); + seq_printf(file, "active requests= %d\n", active_count); + seq_printf(file, "aborted requests = %d\n", aborted_count); + seq_printf(file, "completed requests = %d\n", completed_count); +} + /* == DMAENGINE callbacks = */ static void sba_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *dchan) @@ -1451,6 +1494,19 @@ static void sba_receive_message(struct mbox_client *cl, void *msg) sba_process_received_request(sba, req); } +/* == Debugfs callbacks == */ + +static int sba_debugfs_stats_show(struct seq_file *file, void *offset) +{ + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(file->private); + struct sba_device *sba = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + + /* Write stats in file */ + sba_write_stats_in_seqfile(sba, file); + + return 0; +} + /* == Platform driver routines = */ static int sba_prealloc_channel_resources(struct sba_device *sba) @@ -1721,10 +1777,30 @@ static int sba_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (ret) goto fail_free_mchans; + /* Check availability of debugfs */ + if (!debugfs_initialized()) + goto skip_debugfs; + + /* Create debugfs root entry */ + sba->root = debugfs_create_dir(dev_name(sba->dev), NULL); + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sba->root)) { + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(sba->root); + goto fail_free_resources; + } + + /* Create debugfs stats entry */ + sba->stats = debugfs_create_devm_seqfile(sba->dev, "stats", sba->root, +sba_debugfs_stats_show); + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sba->stats)) { + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(sba->stats); + goto fail_free_debugfs_root; + } +skip_debugfs: + /* Register DMA device with Linux async framework */ ret = sba_async_register(sba); if (ret) - goto fail_free_resources; + goto fail_free_debugfs_root; /* Print device info */ dev_info(sba->dev, "%s using SBAv%d and %d mailbox channels", @@ -1733,6 +1809,8 @@ static int sba_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return 0; +fail_free_debugfs_root: + debugfs_remove_recursive(sba->root); fail_free_resources: sba_freeup_channel_resources(sba); fail_free_mchans: @@ -1748,6 +1826,8 @@ static int sba_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) dma_async_device_unregister(>dma_dev); + debugfs_remove_recursive(sba->root); + sba_freeup_channel_resources(sba); for (i = 0; i < sba->mchans_count; i++) -- 2.7.4