Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3399: fix pd_tcpc0 and pd_tcpc1 node position

2020-05-18 Thread Caesar Wang

Hi Heiko,

在 2020/5/19 上午6:29, Heiko Stübner 写道:

Hi Kever, Caesar,

could you double check where the type-c power-domains are located
in the power-tree, as Caesar did add them under pd_vio back in 2016.


Johan's patch is correct, the pd_tcpc0 and pd_tcpc1 are grouped by VDD_LOGIC.
I have a passed test for pd_vio without pd_tcpc*.



Thanks
Heiko

Am Dienstag, 28. April 2020, 22:30:03 CEST schrieb Johan Jonker:

The pd_tcpc0 and pd_tcpc1 nodes are currently a sub node of pd_vio.
In the rk3399 TRM figure of the 'Power Domain Partition' and in the
table of 'Power Domain and Voltage Domain Summary' these power domains
are positioned directly under VD_LOGIC, so fix that in 'rk3399.dtsi'.

Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker 



Reviewed-by: Caesar Wang 

Thanks,

-Caesar


---
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 20 ++--
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi 
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
index 37279db53..a4dc1bf2e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
@@ -1056,6 +1056,16 @@
clocks = < HCLK_SDIO>;
pm_qos = <_sdioaudio>;
};
+   pd_tcpc0@RK3399_PD_TCPD0 {
+   reg = ;
+   clocks = < SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDCORE>,
+< SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDPHY_REF>;
+   };
+   pd_tcpc1@RK3399_PD_TCPD1 {
+   reg = ;
+   clocks = < SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDCORE>,
+< SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDPHY_REF>;
+   };
pd_usb3@RK3399_PD_USB3 {
reg = ;
clocks = < ACLK_USB3>;
@@ -1088,16 +1098,6 @@
pm_qos = <_isp1_m0>,
 <_isp1_m1>;
};
-   pd_tcpc0@RK3399_PD_TCPD0 {
-   reg = ;
-   clocks = < SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDCORE>,
-< SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDPHY_REF>;
-   };
-   pd_tcpc1@RK3399_PD_TCPD1 {
-   reg = ;
-   clocks = < SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDCORE>,
-< SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDPHY_REF>;
-   };
pd_vo@RK3399_PD_VO {
reg = ;
#address-cells = <1>;












Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3399: fix pd_tcpc0 and pd_tcpc1 node position

2020-05-18 Thread Heiko Stübner
Hi Kever, Caesar,

could you double check where the type-c power-domains are located
in the power-tree, as Caesar did add them under pd_vio back in 2016.

Thanks
Heiko

Am Dienstag, 28. April 2020, 22:30:03 CEST schrieb Johan Jonker:
> The pd_tcpc0 and pd_tcpc1 nodes are currently a sub node of pd_vio.
> In the rk3399 TRM figure of the 'Power Domain Partition' and in the
> table of 'Power Domain and Voltage Domain Summary' these power domains
> are positioned directly under VD_LOGIC, so fix that in 'rk3399.dtsi'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker 
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 20 ++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> index 37279db53..a4dc1bf2e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> @@ -1056,6 +1056,16 @@
>   clocks = < HCLK_SDIO>;
>   pm_qos = <_sdioaudio>;
>   };
> + pd_tcpc0@RK3399_PD_TCPD0 {
> + reg = ;
> + clocks = < SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDCORE>,
> +  < SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDPHY_REF>;
> + };
> + pd_tcpc1@RK3399_PD_TCPD1 {
> + reg = ;
> + clocks = < SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDCORE>,
> +  < SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDPHY_REF>;
> + };
>   pd_usb3@RK3399_PD_USB3 {
>   reg = ;
>   clocks = < ACLK_USB3>;
> @@ -1088,16 +1098,6 @@
>   pm_qos = <_isp1_m0>,
><_isp1_m1>;
>   };
> - pd_tcpc0@RK3399_PD_TCPD0 {
> - reg = ;
> - clocks = < SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDCORE>,
> -  < SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDPHY_REF>;
> - };
> - pd_tcpc1@RK3399_PD_TCPD1 {
> - reg = ;
> - clocks = < SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDCORE>,
> -  < SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDPHY_REF>;
> - };
>   pd_vo@RK3399_PD_VO {
>   reg = ;
>   #address-cells = <1>;
> 






[PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3399: fix pd_tcpc0 and pd_tcpc1 node position

2020-04-28 Thread Johan Jonker
The pd_tcpc0 and pd_tcpc1 nodes are currently a sub node of pd_vio.
In the rk3399 TRM figure of the 'Power Domain Partition' and in the
table of 'Power Domain and Voltage Domain Summary' these power domains
are positioned directly under VD_LOGIC, so fix that in 'rk3399.dtsi'.

Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker 
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 20 ++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi 
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
index 37279db53..a4dc1bf2e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
@@ -1056,6 +1056,16 @@
clocks = < HCLK_SDIO>;
pm_qos = <_sdioaudio>;
};
+   pd_tcpc0@RK3399_PD_TCPD0 {
+   reg = ;
+   clocks = < SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDCORE>,
+< SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDPHY_REF>;
+   };
+   pd_tcpc1@RK3399_PD_TCPD1 {
+   reg = ;
+   clocks = < SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDCORE>,
+< SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDPHY_REF>;
+   };
pd_usb3@RK3399_PD_USB3 {
reg = ;
clocks = < ACLK_USB3>;
@@ -1088,16 +1098,6 @@
pm_qos = <_isp1_m0>,
 <_isp1_m1>;
};
-   pd_tcpc0@RK3399_PD_TCPD0 {
-   reg = ;
-   clocks = < SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDCORE>,
-< SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDPHY_REF>;
-   };
-   pd_tcpc1@RK3399_PD_TCPD1 {
-   reg = ;
-   clocks = < SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDCORE>,
-< SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDPHY_REF>;
-   };
pd_vo@RK3399_PD_VO {
reg = ;
#address-cells = <1>;
-- 
2.11.0