Re: [PATCH v20 02/20] mm/memcg: bail early from swap accounting if memcg disabled

2020-10-30 Thread Alex Shi



在 2020/10/30 下午10:04, Johannes Weiner 写道:
>>> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner 
>>>
>>> This should go in before the previous patch that adds the WARN for it.
>> Right, but than the long ops may not weird. Should I remove the ops and 
>> resend the whole patchset?
> You mean the warning in the changelog? I think that's alright. You can
> just say that you're about to remove the !page->memcg check in the
> next patch because the original reasons for having it are gone, and
> memcg being disabled is the only remaining exception, so this patch
> makes that check explicit in preparation for the next.
> 
> Sorry, it's all a bit of a hassle, I just wouldn't want to introduce a
> known warning into the kernel between those two patches (could confuse
> bisection runs, complicates partial reverts etc.)

H Johannes,

I see, I will exchange the 1st and 2nd patch place with above comments in 
commit log.
I guess you could give more comments on other patches, so I am going to wait 
you for
more comments and send v21 as a whole. :)

Many thanks!
Alex 


Re: [PATCH v20 02/20] mm/memcg: bail early from swap accounting if memcg disabled

2020-10-30 Thread Johannes Weiner
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 10:27:51AM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2020/10/29 下午9:46, Johannes Weiner 写道:
> >>  ? release_pages+0x1ae/0x410
> >>  shmem_alloc_and_acct_page+0x77/0x1c0
> >>  shmem_getpage_gfp+0x162/0x910
> >>  shmem_fault+0x74/0x210
> >>  ? filemap_map_pages+0x29c/0x410
> >>  __do_fault+0x37/0x190
> >>  handle_mm_fault+0x120a/0x1770
> >>  exc_page_fault+0x251/0x450
> >>  ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x8/0x30
> >>  asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi 
> >> Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin 
> >> Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
> >> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins 
> >> Cc: Johannes Weiner 
> >> Cc: Michal Hocko 
> >> Cc: Vladimir Davydov 
> >> Cc: Andrew Morton 
> >> Cc: cgro...@vger.kernel.org
> >> Cc: linux...@kvack.org
> >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Acked-by: Johannes Weiner 
> > 
> > This should go in before the previous patch that adds the WARN for it.
> 
> Right, but than the long ops may not weird. Should I remove the ops and 
> resend the whole patchset?

You mean the warning in the changelog? I think that's alright. You can
just say that you're about to remove the !page->memcg check in the
next patch because the original reasons for having it are gone, and
memcg being disabled is the only remaining exception, so this patch
makes that check explicit in preparation for the next.

Sorry, it's all a bit of a hassle, I just wouldn't want to introduce a
known warning into the kernel between those two patches (could confuse
bisection runs, complicates partial reverts etc.)


Re: [PATCH v20 02/20] mm/memcg: bail early from swap accounting if memcg disabled

2020-10-29 Thread Alex Shi



在 2020/10/29 下午9:46, Johannes Weiner 写道:
>>  ? release_pages+0x1ae/0x410
>>  shmem_alloc_and_acct_page+0x77/0x1c0
>>  shmem_getpage_gfp+0x162/0x910
>>  shmem_fault+0x74/0x210
>>  ? filemap_map_pages+0x29c/0x410
>>  __do_fault+0x37/0x190
>>  handle_mm_fault+0x120a/0x1770
>>  exc_page_fault+0x251/0x450
>>  ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x8/0x30
>>  asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi 
>> Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin 
>> Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
>> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins 
>> Cc: Johannes Weiner 
>> Cc: Michal Hocko 
>> Cc: Vladimir Davydov 
>> Cc: Andrew Morton 
>> Cc: cgro...@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux...@kvack.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner 
> 
> This should go in before the previous patch that adds the WARN for it.

Right, but than the long ops may not weird. Should I remove the ops and resend 
the whole patchset?

Which way is convenient for you?

Thanks
Alex


Re: [PATCH v20 02/20] mm/memcg: bail early from swap accounting if memcg disabled

2020-10-29 Thread Johannes Weiner
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 06:44:47PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> If we disabled memcg by cgroup_disable=memory, page->memcg will be NULL
> and so the charge is skipped and that will trigger a warning like below.
> Let's return from the funcs earlier.
> 
>  anon flags:0x5005b48008000d(locked|uptodate|dirty|swapbacked)
>  raw: 005005b48008000d dead0100 dead0122 8897c7c76ad1
>  raw: 0022  0002 
>  page dumped because: VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE(!memcg)
> ...
>  RIP: 0010:vprintk_emit+0x1f7/0x260
>  Code: 00 84 d2 74 72 0f b6 15 27 58 64 01 48 c7 c0 00 d4 72 82 84 d2 74 09 
> f3 90 0f b6 10 84 d2 75 f7 e8 de 0d 00 00 4c 89 e7 57 9d <0f> 1f 44 00 00 e9 
> 62 ff ff ff 80 3d 88 c9 3a 01 00 0f 85 54 fe ff
>  RSP: 0018:c9000faab358 EFLAGS: 0202
>  RAX: 8272d400 RBX: 005e RCX: 88afd80d0040
>  RDX:  RSI: 0002 RDI: 0202
>  RBP: c9000faab3a8 R08: 8272d440 R09: 00022480
>  R10: 00120c77be68bfac R11: 00cd7568 R12: 0202
>  R13: 0057c0080005 R14: 820a0130 R15: c9000faab3e8
>  ? vprintk_emit+0x140/0x260
>  vprintk_default+0x1a/0x20
>  vprintk_func+0x4f/0xc4
>  ? vprintk_func+0x4f/0xc4
>  printk+0x53/0x6a
>  ? xas_load+0xc/0x80
>  __dump_page.cold.6+0xff/0x4ee
>  ? xas_init_marks+0x23/0x50
>  ? xas_store+0x30/0x40
>  ? free_swap_slot+0x43/0xd0
>  ? put_swap_page+0x119/0x320
>  ? update_load_avg+0x82/0x580
>  dump_page+0x9/0xb
>  mem_cgroup_try_charge_swap+0x16e/0x1d0
>  get_swap_page+0x130/0x210
>  add_to_swap+0x41/0xc0
>  shrink_page_list+0x99e/0xdf0
>  shrink_inactive_list+0x199/0x360
>  shrink_lruvec+0x40d/0x650
>  ? _cond_resched+0x14/0x30
>  ? _cond_resched+0x14/0x30
>  shrink_node+0x226/0x6e0
>  do_try_to_free_pages+0xd0/0x400
>  try_to_free_pages+0xef/0x130
>  __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.127+0x38d/0xbd0
>  ? ___slab_alloc+0x31d/0x6f0
>  __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x27f/0x2c0
>  alloc_pages_vma+0x75/0x220
>  shmem_alloc_page+0x46/0x90
>  ? release_pages+0x1ae/0x410
>  shmem_alloc_and_acct_page+0x77/0x1c0
>  shmem_getpage_gfp+0x162/0x910
>  shmem_fault+0x74/0x210
>  ? filemap_map_pages+0x29c/0x410
>  __do_fault+0x37/0x190
>  handle_mm_fault+0x120a/0x1770
>  exc_page_fault+0x251/0x450
>  ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x8/0x30
>  asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi 
> Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin 
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins 
> Cc: Johannes Weiner 
> Cc: Michal Hocko 
> Cc: Vladimir Davydov 
> Cc: Andrew Morton 
> Cc: cgro...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux...@kvack.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner 

This should go in before the previous patch that adds the WARN for it.


[PATCH v20 02/20] mm/memcg: bail early from swap accounting if memcg disabled

2020-10-29 Thread Alex Shi
If we disabled memcg by cgroup_disable=memory, page->memcg will be NULL
and so the charge is skipped and that will trigger a warning like below.
Let's return from the funcs earlier.

 anon flags:0x5005b48008000d(locked|uptodate|dirty|swapbacked)
 raw: 005005b48008000d dead0100 dead0122 8897c7c76ad1
 raw: 0022  0002 
 page dumped because: VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE(!memcg)
...
 RIP: 0010:vprintk_emit+0x1f7/0x260
 Code: 00 84 d2 74 72 0f b6 15 27 58 64 01 48 c7 c0 00 d4 72 82 84 d2 74 09 f3 
90 0f b6 10 84 d2 75 f7 e8 de 0d 00 00 4c 89 e7 57 9d <0f> 1f 44 00 00 e9 62 ff 
ff ff 80 3d 88 c9 3a 01 00 0f 85 54 fe ff
 RSP: 0018:c9000faab358 EFLAGS: 0202
 RAX: 8272d400 RBX: 005e RCX: 88afd80d0040
 RDX:  RSI: 0002 RDI: 0202
 RBP: c9000faab3a8 R08: 8272d440 R09: 00022480
 R10: 00120c77be68bfac R11: 00cd7568 R12: 0202
 R13: 0057c0080005 R14: 820a0130 R15: c9000faab3e8
 ? vprintk_emit+0x140/0x260
 vprintk_default+0x1a/0x20
 vprintk_func+0x4f/0xc4
 ? vprintk_func+0x4f/0xc4
 printk+0x53/0x6a
 ? xas_load+0xc/0x80
 __dump_page.cold.6+0xff/0x4ee
 ? xas_init_marks+0x23/0x50
 ? xas_store+0x30/0x40
 ? free_swap_slot+0x43/0xd0
 ? put_swap_page+0x119/0x320
 ? update_load_avg+0x82/0x580
 dump_page+0x9/0xb
 mem_cgroup_try_charge_swap+0x16e/0x1d0
 get_swap_page+0x130/0x210
 add_to_swap+0x41/0xc0
 shrink_page_list+0x99e/0xdf0
 shrink_inactive_list+0x199/0x360
 shrink_lruvec+0x40d/0x650
 ? _cond_resched+0x14/0x30
 ? _cond_resched+0x14/0x30
 shrink_node+0x226/0x6e0
 do_try_to_free_pages+0xd0/0x400
 try_to_free_pages+0xef/0x130
 __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.127+0x38d/0xbd0
 ? ___slab_alloc+0x31d/0x6f0
 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x27f/0x2c0
 alloc_pages_vma+0x75/0x220
 shmem_alloc_page+0x46/0x90
 ? release_pages+0x1ae/0x410
 shmem_alloc_and_acct_page+0x77/0x1c0
 shmem_getpage_gfp+0x162/0x910
 shmem_fault+0x74/0x210
 ? filemap_map_pages+0x29c/0x410
 __do_fault+0x37/0x190
 handle_mm_fault+0x120a/0x1770
 exc_page_fault+0x251/0x450
 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x8/0x30
 asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi 
Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin 
Acked-by: Michal Hocko 
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins 
Cc: Johannes Weiner 
Cc: Michal Hocko 
Cc: Vladimir Davydov 
Cc: Andrew Morton 
Cc: cgro...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux...@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 6 ++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 6b67da305958..e46b9f9501c2 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -7169,6 +7169,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_swapout(struct page *page, swp_entry_t 
entry)
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page), page);
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_count(page), page);
 
+   if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
+   return;
+
if (cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys))
return;
 
@@ -7233,6 +7236,9 @@ int mem_cgroup_try_charge_swap(struct page *page, 
swp_entry_t entry)
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
unsigned short oldid;
 
+   if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
+   return 0;
+
if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys))
return 0;
 
-- 
1.8.3.1