Re: [PATCH v3] btusb: fix wrong use of PTR_ERR()

2013-07-10 Thread Gustavo Padovan
Hi Adam,

* Adam Lee  [2013-07-10 10:02:12 +0800]:

> PTR_ERR() returns a signed long type value which is limited by IS_ERR(),
> it must be a negative number whose range is [-MAX_ERRNO, 0).
> 
> The bug here returns negative numbers as error codes, then check it by
> "if (ret < 0)", but -PTR_ERR() is actually positive. The wrong use here
> leads to failure as below, even panic.
> 
> [   12.958920] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
> [   14.961765] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
> [   16.964688] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
> [   20.954501] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
> (-110)
> [   22.957358] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
> [   30.948922] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
> (-110)
> [   32.951780] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
> [   40.943359] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
> (-110)
> [   42.946219] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
> [   50.937812] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
> (-110)
> [   52.940670] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
> [   60.932236] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
> (-110)
> [   62.935092] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
> [   70.926688] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
> (-110)
> [   72.929545] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
> [   80.92] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
> (-110)
> [   82.923969] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc2f tx timeout
> [   90.915542] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc2f) failed 
> (-110)
> [   92.918406] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc11 tx timeout
> [  100.909955] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc11) failed 
> (-110)
> [  102.912858] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc60 tx timeout
> [  110.904394] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc60) failed 
> (-110)
> [  112.907293] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc11 tx timeout
> [  120.898831] Bluetooth: hci0 exiting Intel manufacturer mode failed (-110)
> [  120.904757] bluetoothd[1030]: segfault at 4 ip 7f8b2eb55236 sp 
> 7fff53ff6920 error 4 in bluetoothd[7f8b2eaff000+cb000]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adam Lee 
> ---
>  drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 14 +++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Patch has been applied to bluetooth.git. Thanks.

Gustavo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH v3] btusb: fix wrong use of PTR_ERR()

2013-07-10 Thread Gustavo Padovan
Hi Adam,

* Adam Lee adam8...@gmail.com [2013-07-10 10:02:12 +0800]:

 PTR_ERR() returns a signed long type value which is limited by IS_ERR(),
 it must be a negative number whose range is [-MAX_ERRNO, 0).
 
 The bug here returns negative numbers as error codes, then check it by
 if (ret  0), but -PTR_ERR() is actually positive. The wrong use here
 leads to failure as below, even panic.
 
 [   12.958920] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
 [   14.961765] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
 [   16.964688] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
 [   20.954501] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
 (-110)
 [   22.957358] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
 [   30.948922] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
 (-110)
 [   32.951780] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
 [   40.943359] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
 (-110)
 [   42.946219] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
 [   50.937812] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
 (-110)
 [   52.940670] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
 [   60.932236] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
 (-110)
 [   62.935092] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
 [   70.926688] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
 (-110)
 [   72.929545] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
 [   80.92] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
 (-110)
 [   82.923969] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc2f tx timeout
 [   90.915542] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc2f) failed 
 (-110)
 [   92.918406] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc11 tx timeout
 [  100.909955] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc11) failed 
 (-110)
 [  102.912858] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc60 tx timeout
 [  110.904394] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc60) failed 
 (-110)
 [  112.907293] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc11 tx timeout
 [  120.898831] Bluetooth: hci0 exiting Intel manufacturer mode failed (-110)
 [  120.904757] bluetoothd[1030]: segfault at 4 ip 7f8b2eb55236 sp 
 7fff53ff6920 error 4 in bluetoothd[7f8b2eaff000+cb000]
 
 Signed-off-by: Adam Lee adam@canonical.com
 ---
  drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 14 +++---
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Patch has been applied to bluetooth.git. Thanks.

Gustavo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH v3] btusb: fix wrong use of PTR_ERR()

2013-07-09 Thread Adam Lee
PTR_ERR() returns a signed long type value which is limited by IS_ERR(),
it must be a negative number whose range is [-MAX_ERRNO, 0).

The bug here returns negative numbers as error codes, then check it by
"if (ret < 0)", but -PTR_ERR() is actually positive. The wrong use here
leads to failure as below, even panic.

[   12.958920] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
[   14.961765] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
[   16.964688] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
[   20.954501] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
(-110)
[   22.957358] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
[   30.948922] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
(-110)
[   32.951780] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
[   40.943359] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
(-110)
[   42.946219] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
[   50.937812] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
(-110)
[   52.940670] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
[   60.932236] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
(-110)
[   62.935092] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
[   70.926688] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
(-110)
[   72.929545] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
[   80.92] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
(-110)
[   82.923969] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc2f tx timeout
[   90.915542] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc2f) failed 
(-110)
[   92.918406] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc11 tx timeout
[  100.909955] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc11) failed 
(-110)
[  102.912858] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc60 tx timeout
[  110.904394] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc60) failed 
(-110)
[  112.907293] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc11 tx timeout
[  120.898831] Bluetooth: hci0 exiting Intel manufacturer mode failed (-110)
[  120.904757] bluetoothd[1030]: segfault at 4 ip 7f8b2eb55236 sp 
7fff53ff6920 error 4 in bluetoothd[7f8b2eaff000+cb000]

Signed-off-by: Adam Lee 
---
 drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 14 +++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
index 7a7e5f8..23df968 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ static int btusb_setup_intel_patching(struct hci_dev 
*hdev,
if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
BT_ERR("%s sending Intel patch command (0x%4.4x) failed (%ld)",
   hdev->name, cmd->opcode, PTR_ERR(skb));
-   return -PTR_ERR(skb);
+   return PTR_ERR(skb);
}
 
/* It ensures that the returned event matches the event data read from
@@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ static int btusb_setup_intel(struct hci_dev *hdev)
if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
BT_ERR("%s sending initial HCI reset command failed (%ld)",
   hdev->name, PTR_ERR(skb));
-   return -PTR_ERR(skb);
+   return PTR_ERR(skb);
}
kfree_skb(skb);
 
@@ -1158,7 +1158,7 @@ static int btusb_setup_intel(struct hci_dev *hdev)
if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
BT_ERR("%s reading Intel fw version command failed (%ld)",
   hdev->name, PTR_ERR(skb));
-   return -PTR_ERR(skb);
+   return PTR_ERR(skb);
}
 
if (skb->len != sizeof(*ver)) {
@@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ static int btusb_setup_intel(struct hci_dev *hdev)
BT_ERR("%s entering Intel manufacturer mode failed (%ld)",
   hdev->name, PTR_ERR(skb));
release_firmware(fw);
-   return -PTR_ERR(skb);
+   return PTR_ERR(skb);
}
 
if (skb->data[0]) {
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ static int btusb_setup_intel(struct hci_dev *hdev)
if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
BT_ERR("%s exiting Intel manufacturer mode failed (%ld)",
   hdev->name, PTR_ERR(skb));
-   return -PTR_ERR(skb);
+   return PTR_ERR(skb);
}
kfree_skb(skb);
 
@@ -1289,7 +1289,7 @@ exit_mfg_disable:
if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
BT_ERR("%s exiting Intel manufacturer mode failed (%ld)",
   hdev->name, PTR_ERR(skb));
-   return -PTR_ERR(skb);
+   return PTR_ERR(skb);
}
kfree_skb(skb);
 
@@ -1307,7 +1307,7 @@ exit_mfg_deactivate:
if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
BT_ERR("%s exiting Intel manufacturer mode failed (%ld)",
   hdev->name, PTR_ERR(skb));
-   return -PTR_ERR(skb);
+   return PTR_ERR(skb);
}
kfree_skb(skb);
 
-- 
1.8.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v3] btusb: fix wrong use of PTR_ERR()

2013-07-09 Thread Adam Lee
PTR_ERR() returns a signed long type value which is limited by IS_ERR(),
it must be a negative number whose range is [-MAX_ERRNO, 0).

The bug here returns negative numbers as error codes, then check it by
if (ret  0), but -PTR_ERR() is actually positive. The wrong use here
leads to failure as below, even panic.

[   12.958920] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
[   14.961765] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
[   16.964688] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
[   20.954501] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
(-110)
[   22.957358] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
[   30.948922] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
(-110)
[   32.951780] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
[   40.943359] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
(-110)
[   42.946219] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
[   50.937812] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
(-110)
[   52.940670] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
[   60.932236] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
(-110)
[   62.935092] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
[   70.926688] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
(-110)
[   72.929545] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc8e tx timeout
[   80.92] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc8e) failed 
(-110)
[   82.923969] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc2f tx timeout
[   90.915542] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc2f) failed 
(-110)
[   92.918406] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc11 tx timeout
[  100.909955] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc11) failed 
(-110)
[  102.912858] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc60 tx timeout
[  110.904394] Bluetooth: hci0 sending Intel patch command (0xfc60) failed 
(-110)
[  112.907293] Bluetooth: hci0 command 0xfc11 tx timeout
[  120.898831] Bluetooth: hci0 exiting Intel manufacturer mode failed (-110)
[  120.904757] bluetoothd[1030]: segfault at 4 ip 7f8b2eb55236 sp 
7fff53ff6920 error 4 in bluetoothd[7f8b2eaff000+cb000]

Signed-off-by: Adam Lee adam@canonical.com
---
 drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 14 +++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
index 7a7e5f8..23df968 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ static int btusb_setup_intel_patching(struct hci_dev 
*hdev,
if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
BT_ERR(%s sending Intel patch command (0x%4.4x) failed (%ld),
   hdev-name, cmd-opcode, PTR_ERR(skb));
-   return -PTR_ERR(skb);
+   return PTR_ERR(skb);
}
 
/* It ensures that the returned event matches the event data read from
@@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ static int btusb_setup_intel(struct hci_dev *hdev)
if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
BT_ERR(%s sending initial HCI reset command failed (%ld),
   hdev-name, PTR_ERR(skb));
-   return -PTR_ERR(skb);
+   return PTR_ERR(skb);
}
kfree_skb(skb);
 
@@ -1158,7 +1158,7 @@ static int btusb_setup_intel(struct hci_dev *hdev)
if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
BT_ERR(%s reading Intel fw version command failed (%ld),
   hdev-name, PTR_ERR(skb));
-   return -PTR_ERR(skb);
+   return PTR_ERR(skb);
}
 
if (skb-len != sizeof(*ver)) {
@@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ static int btusb_setup_intel(struct hci_dev *hdev)
BT_ERR(%s entering Intel manufacturer mode failed (%ld),
   hdev-name, PTR_ERR(skb));
release_firmware(fw);
-   return -PTR_ERR(skb);
+   return PTR_ERR(skb);
}
 
if (skb-data[0]) {
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ static int btusb_setup_intel(struct hci_dev *hdev)
if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
BT_ERR(%s exiting Intel manufacturer mode failed (%ld),
   hdev-name, PTR_ERR(skb));
-   return -PTR_ERR(skb);
+   return PTR_ERR(skb);
}
kfree_skb(skb);
 
@@ -1289,7 +1289,7 @@ exit_mfg_disable:
if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
BT_ERR(%s exiting Intel manufacturer mode failed (%ld),
   hdev-name, PTR_ERR(skb));
-   return -PTR_ERR(skb);
+   return PTR_ERR(skb);
}
kfree_skb(skb);
 
@@ -1307,7 +1307,7 @@ exit_mfg_deactivate:
if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
BT_ERR(%s exiting Intel manufacturer mode failed (%ld),
   hdev-name, PTR_ERR(skb));
-   return -PTR_ERR(skb);
+   return PTR_ERR(skb);
}
kfree_skb(skb);
 
-- 
1.8.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read