Re: [PATCH v4] net/ipv4/inet_fragment: Batch fqdir destroy works

2020-12-12 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:36:53 +0100 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:24 PM SeongJae Park  wrote:
> > From: SeongJae Park 
> >
> > On a few of our systems, I found frequent 'unshare(CLONE_NEWNET)' calls
> > make the number of active slab objects including 'sock_inode_cache' type
> > rapidly and continuously increase.  As a result, memory pressure occurs.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet 
> 
> Jakub or David might change the patch title, no need to resend.

"inet: frags: batch fqdir destroy works" it is.

Applied, thanks!


Re: [PATCH v4] net/ipv4/inet_fragment: Batch fqdir destroy works

2020-12-11 Thread SeongJae Park
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:36:53 +0100 Eric Dumazet  wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:24 PM SeongJae Park  wrote:
> >
> > From: SeongJae Park 
> >
> > On a few of our systems, I found frequent 'unshare(CLONE_NEWNET)' calls
> > make the number of active slab objects including 'sock_inode_cache' type
> > rapidly and continuously increase.  As a result, memory pressure occurs.
> >
> 
> > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park 
> > ---
> >
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet 
> 
> Jakub or David might change the patch title, no need to resend.
> 
> Thanks for this nice improvement.

My very best pleasure!  Thank you always for your nice advices and reviews!


Thanks,
SeongJae Park


Re: [PATCH v4] net/ipv4/inet_fragment: Batch fqdir destroy works

2020-12-11 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:24 PM SeongJae Park  wrote:
>
> From: SeongJae Park 
>
> On a few of our systems, I found frequent 'unshare(CLONE_NEWNET)' calls
> make the number of active slab objects including 'sock_inode_cache' type
> rapidly and continuously increase.  As a result, memory pressure occurs.
>

> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park 
> ---
>

Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet 

Jakub or David might change the patch title, no need to resend.

Thanks for this nice improvement.


[PATCH v4] net/ipv4/inet_fragment: Batch fqdir destroy works

2020-12-11 Thread SeongJae Park
From: SeongJae Park 

On a few of our systems, I found frequent 'unshare(CLONE_NEWNET)' calls
make the number of active slab objects including 'sock_inode_cache' type
rapidly and continuously increase.  As a result, memory pressure occurs.

In more detail, I made an artificial reproducer that resembles the
workload that we found the problem and reproduce the problem faster.  It
merely repeats 'unshare(CLONE_NEWNET)' 50,000 times in a loop.  It takes
about 2 minutes.  On 40 CPU cores / 70GB DRAM machine, the available
memory continuously reduced in a fast speed (about 120MB per second,
15GB in total within the 2 minutes).  Note that the issue don't
reproduce on every machine.  On my 6 CPU cores machine, the problem
didn't reproduce.

'cleanup_net()' and 'fqdir_work_fn()' are functions that deallocate the
relevant memory objects.  They are asynchronously invoked by the work
queues and internally use 'rcu_barrier()' to ensure safe destructions.
'cleanup_net()' works in a batched maneer in a single thread worker,
while 'fqdir_work_fn()' works for each 'fqdir_exit()' call in the
'system_wq'.  Therefore, 'fqdir_work_fn()' called frequently under the
workload and made the contention for 'rcu_barrier()' high.  In more
detail, the global mutex, 'rcu_state.barrier_mutex' became the
bottleneck.

This commit avoids such contention by doing the 'rcu_barrier()' and
subsequent lightweight works in a batched manner, as similar to that of
'cleanup_net()'.  The fqdir hashtable destruction, which is done before
the 'rcu_barrier()', is still allowed to run in parallel for fast
processing, but this commit makes it to use a dedicated work queue
instead of the 'system_wq', to make sure that the number of threads is
bounded.

Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park 
---

Changes from v3
(https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201211082032.26965-1-sjp...@amazon.com/)
- Use system_wq for the batched works and a dedicated non-ordered work
  queue for rhashtable destruction (Eric Dumazet)

Changes from v2
(https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201210080844.23741-1-sjp...@amazon.com/)
- Add numbers after the patch (Eric Dumazet)
- Make only 'rcu_barrier()' and subsequent lightweight works serialized
  (Eric Dumazet)

Changes from v1
(https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201208094529.23266-1-sjp...@amazon.com/)
- Keep xmas tree variable ordering (Jakub Kicinski)
- Add more numbers (Eric Dumazet)
- Use 'llist_for_each_entry_safe()' (Eric Dumazet)

---
 include/net/inet_frag.h  |  1 +
 net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c | 47 +---
 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/inet_frag.h b/include/net/inet_frag.h
index bac79e817776..48cc5795ceda 100644
--- a/include/net/inet_frag.h
+++ b/include/net/inet_frag.h
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ struct fqdir {
/* Keep atomic mem on separate cachelines in structs that include it */
atomic_long_t   mem cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
struct work_struct  destroy_work;
+   struct llist_node   free_list;
 };
 
 /**
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
index 10d31733297d..05cd198d7a6b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
@@ -145,12 +145,16 @@ static void inet_frags_free_cb(void *ptr, void *arg)
inet_frag_destroy(fq);
 }
 
-static void fqdir_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
+static LLIST_HEAD(fqdir_free_list);
+
+static void fqdir_free_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 {
-   struct fqdir *fqdir = container_of(work, struct fqdir, destroy_work);
-   struct inet_frags *f = fqdir->f;
+   struct llist_node *kill_list;
+   struct fqdir *fqdir, *tmp;
+   struct inet_frags *f;
 
-   rhashtable_free_and_destroy(&fqdir->rhashtable, inet_frags_free_cb, 
NULL);
+   /* Atomically snapshot the list of fqdirs to free */
+   kill_list = llist_del_all(&fqdir_free_list);
 
/* We need to make sure all ongoing call_rcu(..., inet_frag_destroy_rcu)
 * have completed, since they need to dereference fqdir.
@@ -158,10 +162,25 @@ static void fqdir_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 */
rcu_barrier();
 
-   if (refcount_dec_and_test(&f->refcnt))
-   complete(&f->completion);
+   llist_for_each_entry_safe(fqdir, tmp, kill_list, free_list) {
+   f = fqdir->f;
+   if (refcount_dec_and_test(&f->refcnt))
+   complete(&f->completion);
 
-   kfree(fqdir);
+   kfree(fqdir);
+   }
+}
+
+static DECLARE_WORK(fqdir_free_work, fqdir_free_fn);
+
+static void fqdir_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+   struct fqdir *fqdir = container_of(work, struct fqdir, destroy_work);
+
+   rhashtable_free_and_destroy(&fqdir->rhashtable, inet_frags_free_cb, 
NULL);
+
+   if (llist_add(&fqdir->free_list, &fqdir_free_list))
+   queue_work(system_wq, &fqdir_free_work);
 }
 
 int fqdir_init(struct fqdir **fqdirp, struct inet_frags *f, struct net *net)
@@ -184,1