Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] loop: Refactor loop_set_status() size calculation

2020-05-06 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig 


Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] loop: Refactor loop_set_status() size calculation

2020-05-05 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 09:33:23PM +0200, Martijn Coenen wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 7:30 PM Christoph Hellwig  wrote:
> >
> > For some reason this fails to apply for me against both
> > Jens' for-5.8/block and Linus' current tree.
> >
> > What is the baseline for this series?
> 
> This was based on Linus' tree from a week or two ago or so, but I
> think you're most likely missing this one?
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/31/755
> 
> (I mentioned it in the cover letter, but can make it a part of this
> series if you prefer).

Yes, I missed that one.


Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] loop: Refactor loop_set_status() size calculation

2020-05-01 Thread Martijn Coenen
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 7:30 PM Christoph Hellwig  wrote:
>
> For some reason this fails to apply for me against both
> Jens' for-5.8/block and Linus' current tree.
>
> What is the baseline for this series?

This was based on Linus' tree from a week or two ago or so, but I
think you're most likely missing this one?

https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/31/755

(I mentioned it in the cover letter, but can make it a part of this
series if you prefer).


Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] loop: Refactor loop_set_status() size calculation

2020-05-01 Thread Christoph Hellwig
For some reason this fails to apply for me against both
Jens' for-5.8/block and Linus' current tree.

What is the baseline for this series?


[PATCH v4 04/10] loop: Refactor loop_set_status() size calculation

2020-04-29 Thread Martijn Coenen
figure_loop_size() calculates the loop size based on the passed in
parameters, but at the same time it updates the offset and sizelimit
parameters in the loop device configuration. That is a somewhat
unexpected side effect of a function with this name, and it is only only
needed by one of the two callers of this function - loop_set_status().

Move the lo_offset and lo_sizelimit assignment back into loop_set_status(),
and use the newly factored out functions to validate and apply the newly
calculated size. This allows us to get rid of figure_loop_size() in a
follow-up commit.

Signed-off-by: Martijn Coenen 
---
 drivers/block/loop.c | 44 +++-
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index 8f3194c2b8aa..9f5913879921 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -268,11 +268,6 @@ figure_loop_size(struct loop_device *lo, loff_t offset, 
loff_t sizelimit)
if (err)
return err;
 
-   if (lo->lo_offset != offset)
-   lo->lo_offset = offset;
-   if (lo->lo_sizelimit != sizelimit)
-   lo->lo_sizelimit = sizelimit;
-
loop_set_size(lo, size);
 
return 0;
@@ -1294,6 +1289,8 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct 
loop_info64 *info)
kuid_t uid = current_uid();
struct block_device *bdev;
bool partscan = false;
+   bool size_changed = false;
+   loff_t validated_size;
 
err = mutex_lock_killable(_ctl_mutex);
if (err)
@@ -1315,6 +1312,13 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct 
loop_info64 *info)
 
if (lo->lo_offset != info->lo_offset ||
lo->lo_sizelimit != info->lo_sizelimit) {
+   loff_t size = get_size(info->lo_offset, info->lo_sizelimit,
+  lo->lo_backing_file);
+   err = loop_validate_size(size);
+   if (err)
+   goto out_unlock;
+   size_changed = true;
+   validated_size = size;
sync_blockdev(lo->lo_device);
kill_bdev(lo->lo_device);
}
@@ -1322,6 +1326,15 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct 
loop_info64 *info)
/* I/O need to be drained during transfer transition */
blk_mq_freeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
 
+   if (size_changed && lo->lo_device->bd_inode->i_mapping->nrpages) {
+   /* If any pages were dirtied after kill_bdev(), try again */
+   err = -EAGAIN;
+   pr_warn("%s: loop%d (%s) has still dirty pages (nrpages=%lu)\n",
+   __func__, lo->lo_number, lo->lo_file_name,
+   lo->lo_device->bd_inode->i_mapping->nrpages);
+   goto out_unfreeze;
+   }
+
err = loop_release_xfer(lo);
if (err)
goto out_unfreeze;
@@ -1345,22 +1358,8 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct 
loop_info64 *info)
if (err)
goto out_unfreeze;
 
-   if (lo->lo_offset != info->lo_offset ||
-   lo->lo_sizelimit != info->lo_sizelimit) {
-   /* kill_bdev should have truncated all the pages */
-   if (lo->lo_device->bd_inode->i_mapping->nrpages) {
-   err = -EAGAIN;
-   pr_warn("%s: loop%d (%s) has still dirty pages 
(nrpages=%lu)\n",
-   __func__, lo->lo_number, lo->lo_file_name,
-   lo->lo_device->bd_inode->i_mapping->nrpages);
-   goto out_unfreeze;
-   }
-   if (figure_loop_size(lo, info->lo_offset, info->lo_sizelimit)) {
-   err = -EFBIG;
-   goto out_unfreeze;
-   }
-   }
-
+   lo->lo_offset = info->lo_offset;
+   lo->lo_sizelimit = info->lo_sizelimit;
memcpy(lo->lo_file_name, info->lo_file_name, LO_NAME_SIZE);
memcpy(lo->lo_crypt_name, info->lo_crypt_name, LO_NAME_SIZE);
lo->lo_file_name[LO_NAME_SIZE-1] = 0;
@@ -1384,6 +1383,9 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct 
loop_info64 *info)
lo->lo_key_owner = uid;
}
 
+   if (size_changed)
+   loop_set_size(lo, validated_size);
+
loop_config_discard(lo);
 
/* update dio if lo_offset or transfer is changed */
-- 
2.26.2.303.gf8c07b1a785-goog