Re: [PATCH v4 26/34] tools/testing/nvdimm: Convert to printbuf

2022-07-01 Thread Shivaprasad G Bhat

On 6/25/22 05:12, Santosh Sivaraj wrote:
I don't have setup to test this now. Adding Shiva and Vaibhav who could 
probably help. Thanks, Santosh On Sat, 25 Jun, 2022, 1:03 am Dan 
Williams,  wrote: [ add Santosh ] Kent 
Overstreet wrote: ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
I don't have setup to test this now. Adding Shiva and Vaibhav who could 
probably help.


Thanks,
Santosh

On Sat, 25 Jun, 2022, 1:03 am Dan Williams, > wrote:


[ add Santosh ]

Kent Overstreet wrote:
 > This converts from seq_buf to printbuf. Here we're using printbuf
with
 > an external buffer, meaning it's a direct conversion.
 >
 > Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet mailto:kent.overstr...@gmail.com>>
 > Cc: Dan Williams mailto:dan.j.willi...@intel.com>>
 > Cc: Dave Hansen mailto:dave.han...@linux.intel.com>>
 > Cc: nvd...@lists.linux.dev 

Acked-by: Dan Williams mailto:dan.j.willi...@intel.com>>



The ndtest build requires [1] as the build is currently broken from 
nd_namespace_blk/blk_region infrastructure removal.


Dan, Could you review [1] and see if it can be included as well ?

With [1], the this patch is tested, and works fine.

Tested-By: Shivaprasad G Bhat 

References:
[1] 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-nvdimm/patch/165025395730.2821159.14794984437851867426.st...@lep8c.aus.stglabs.ibm.com/




This probably also wants a Tested-by from Santosh, but it looks ok
to me.





RE: [PATCH v4 26/34] tools/testing/nvdimm: Convert to printbuf

2022-06-24 Thread Dan Williams
[ add Santosh ]

Kent Overstreet wrote:
> This converts from seq_buf to printbuf. Here we're using printbuf with
> an external buffer, meaning it's a direct conversion.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet 
> Cc: Dan Williams 
> Cc: Dave Hansen 
> Cc: nvd...@lists.linux.dev

Acked-by: Dan Williams 

This probably also wants a Tested-by from Santosh, but it looks ok to me.



[PATCH v4 26/34] tools/testing/nvdimm: Convert to printbuf

2022-06-19 Thread Kent Overstreet
This converts from seq_buf to printbuf. Here we're using printbuf with
an external buffer, meaning it's a direct conversion.

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet 
Cc: Dan Williams 
Cc: Dave Hansen 
Cc: nvd...@lists.linux.dev
---
 tools/testing/nvdimm/test/ndtest.c | 22 ++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/ndtest.c 
b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/ndtest.c
index 4d1a947367..a2097955da 100644
--- a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/ndtest.c
+++ b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/ndtest.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
-#include 
+#include 
 
 #include "../watermark.h"
 #include "nfit_test.h"
@@ -740,32 +740,30 @@ static ssize_t flags_show(struct device *dev,
 {
struct nvdimm *nvdimm = to_nvdimm(dev);
struct ndtest_dimm *dimm = nvdimm_provider_data(nvdimm);
-   struct seq_buf s;
+   struct printbuf s = PRINTBUF_EXTERN(buf, PAGE_SIZE);
u64 flags;
 
flags = dimm->flags;
 
-   seq_buf_init(&s, buf, PAGE_SIZE);
if (flags & PAPR_PMEM_UNARMED_MASK)
-   seq_buf_printf(&s, "not_armed ");
+   prt_printf(&s, "not_armed ");
 
if (flags & PAPR_PMEM_BAD_SHUTDOWN_MASK)
-   seq_buf_printf(&s, "flush_fail ");
+   prt_printf(&s, "flush_fail ");
 
if (flags & PAPR_PMEM_BAD_RESTORE_MASK)
-   seq_buf_printf(&s, "restore_fail ");
+   prt_printf(&s, "restore_fail ");
 
if (flags & PAPR_PMEM_SAVE_MASK)
-   seq_buf_printf(&s, "save_fail ");
+   prt_printf(&s, "save_fail ");
 
if (flags & PAPR_PMEM_SMART_EVENT_MASK)
-   seq_buf_printf(&s, "smart_notify ");
+   prt_printf(&s, "smart_notify ");
 
+   if (printbuf_written(&s))
+   prt_printf(&s, "\n");
 
-   if (seq_buf_used(&s))
-   seq_buf_printf(&s, "\n");
-
-   return seq_buf_used(&s);
+   return printbuf_written(&s);
 }
 static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(flags);
 
-- 
2.36.1