Re: [PATCH v5] Fix INT1 Recursion with unregistered breakpoints
> /* > + * Check if we got an execute breakpoint, if so > + * set the resume flag to avoid int1 recursion. > + */ > + if ((dr7 & (DR_RW_MASK << ((i * DR_CONTROL_SIZE) + > + DR_CONTROL_SHIFT))) == DR_RW_EXECUTE) > + args->regs->flags |= X86_EFLAGS_RF; > + > + /* This patch is functionaly correct but I still need to make it perfect. I more try and test run. I tested this and it works, but I need to shift it the other way (right) rather than (left) since DR_RW_EXECUTE is always 0 this will always work but to be perfect I need to do: if (((dr7 >> ((i * DR_CONTROL_SIZE) + DR_CONTROL_SHIFT)) & DR_RW_MASK) == DR_RW_EXECUTE) and that is perfect syntax. Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH v5] Fix INT1 Recursion with unregistered breakpoints
Please consider the attached patch. SUMMARY This patch corrects a hard lockup failure of the system kernel if the operating system receives a breakpoint exception at a code execution address which was not registered with the operating system. The patch allows kernel debuggers, application profiling and performance modules, and external debugging tools to work better together at sharing the breakpoint registers on the platform in a way that they do not cause errors and system faults, and enables the full feature set in the breakpoint API. If a kernel application triggers a breakpoint or programs one in error, this patch will catch the condition and report it to the system log without the operating system experiencing a system fault. There are several consumers of the Linux Breakpoint API and all of them can and sometimes do cause the condition this patch corrects. CONDITIONS WHICH RESULT IN THIS SYSTEM FAULT This system fault can be caused from several sources. Any kernel code can access the debug registers and trigger a breakpoint directly by writing to these registers and trigger a hard system hang if no breakpoint was registered via arch_install_hw_breakpoint(). kgdb/kdb and the perf event system both present garbage status in dr6 then subsequently write this status into the thread.debugreg6 variable, then in some cases call hw_breakpoint_restore() which writes this status back into the dr6 hardware register. arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c static void kgdb_hw_overflow_handler(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_sample_data *data, struct pt_regs *regs) { struct task_struct *tsk = current; int i; for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) if (breakinfo[i].enabled) tsk->thread.debugreg6 |= (DR_TRAP0 << i); } arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c static void kgdb_correct_hw_break(void) { ... snip ... if (!dbg_is_early) hw_breakpoint_restore(); ... snip ... } arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c void hw_breakpoint_restore(void) { set_debugreg(__this_cpu_read(cpu_debugreg[0]), 0); set_debugreg(__this_cpu_read(cpu_debugreg[1]), 1); set_debugreg(__this_cpu_read(cpu_debugreg[2]), 2); set_debugreg(__this_cpu_read(cpu_debugreg[3]), 3); set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg6, 6); set_debugreg(__this_cpu_read(cpu_dr7), 7); } The hardware only altars those bits that change, the rest of the altered dr6 value remains in the register. Upon the next int1 exception, dr6 presents this manufactured status to the int1 handler in hw_breakpoint.c which calls the non-existent breakpoint exceptions and any handlers which may have validly registered, creating phantom events. If other subsystems which call the perf handlers also have breakpoints registered, this manufactured status causes erroneous events to be signaled to the layers above. arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c static int hw_breakpoint_handler(struct die_args *args) { ... snip ... /* Handle all the breakpoints that were triggered */ for (i = 0; i < HBP_NUM; ++i) { if (likely(!(dr6 & (DR_TRAP0 << i continue; ... snip ... perf_bp_event(bp, args->regs); ... snip ... } After a few iterations of this cycling through the system, the thread.debugreg6 variable starts to resemble a random number generator as far as to which breakpoint just occurred. The perf handlers cause a different incarnation of this problem and create the situation by triggering a stale breakpoint set in dr7 for which the perf bp is NULL (not registered) or late and for which there is a single code path that fails to set the resume flag and clear the int1 exception status. TESTING AND REVIEW PERFORMED I have reviewed all the code that touches this patch and have determined it will function and support all of the software that depends on this handler properly. I have compiled and tested this patch with a test harness that tests the robustness of the linux breakpoint API and handlers in the following ways: 1. Setting multiple conditional breakpoints through arch_install_hw_breakpoint API across four processors to test the rate at which the interface can handle breakpoint exceptions 2. Setting unregistered breakpoints to test the handlers robustness in dealing with error handling conditions and errant or spurious hardware conditions and to simulate actual "lazy debug register switching" with null bp handlers to test the robustness of the handlers. 3. Clearing and setting breakpoints across multiple processors then triggering concurrent exceptions in both interrupt and process contexts. This patch improves robustness in several ways in the linux kernel: 1. Corrects bug in handling unregistered breakpoints. 2. Provides hardware check of dr7 to determine source of breakpoint if OS cannot ascertain the int1 source from its own state
Re: [PATCH v5] Fix INT1 Recursion with unregistered breakpoints
> /* > + * Check if we got an execute breakpoint, if so > + * set the resume flag to avoid int1 recursion. > + */ > + if ((dr7 & (DR_RW_MASK << ((i * DR_CONTROL_SIZE) + > + DR_CONTROL_SHIFT))) == DR_RW_EXECUTE) > + args->regs->flags |= X86_EFLAGS_RF; > + > + /* This patch is functionaly correct but I still need to make it perfect. I more try and test run. I tested this and it works, but I need to shift it the other way (right) rather than (left) since DR_RW_EXECUTE is always 0 this will always work but to be perfect I need to do: if (((dr7 >> ((i * DR_CONTROL_SIZE) + DR_CONTROL_SHIFT)) & DR_RW_MASK) == DR_RW_EXECUTE) and that is perfect syntax. Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH v5] Fix INT1 Recursion with unregistered breakpoints
Please consider the attached patch. SUMMARY This patch corrects a hard lockup failure of the system kernel if the operating system receives a breakpoint exception at a code execution address which was not registered with the operating system. The patch allows kernel debuggers, application profiling and performance modules, and external debugging tools to work better together at sharing the breakpoint registers on the platform in a way that they do not cause errors and system faults, and enables the full feature set in the breakpoint API. If a kernel application triggers a breakpoint or programs one in error, this patch will catch the condition and report it to the system log without the operating system experiencing a system fault. There are several consumers of the Linux Breakpoint API and all of them can and sometimes do cause the condition this patch corrects. CONDITIONS WHICH RESULT IN THIS SYSTEM FAULT This system fault can be caused from several sources. Any kernel code can access the debug registers and trigger a breakpoint directly by writing to these registers and trigger a hard system hang if no breakpoint was registered via arch_install_hw_breakpoint(). kgdb/kdb and the perf event system both present garbage status in dr6 then subsequently write this status into the thread.debugreg6 variable, then in some cases call hw_breakpoint_restore() which writes this status back into the dr6 hardware register. arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c static void kgdb_hw_overflow_handler(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_sample_data *data, struct pt_regs *regs) { struct task_struct *tsk = current; int i; for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) if (breakinfo[i].enabled) tsk->thread.debugreg6 |= (DR_TRAP0 << i); } arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c static void kgdb_correct_hw_break(void) { ... snip ... if (!dbg_is_early) hw_breakpoint_restore(); ... snip ... } arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c void hw_breakpoint_restore(void) { set_debugreg(__this_cpu_read(cpu_debugreg[0]), 0); set_debugreg(__this_cpu_read(cpu_debugreg[1]), 1); set_debugreg(__this_cpu_read(cpu_debugreg[2]), 2); set_debugreg(__this_cpu_read(cpu_debugreg[3]), 3); set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg6, 6); set_debugreg(__this_cpu_read(cpu_dr7), 7); } The hardware only altars those bits that change, the rest of the altered dr6 value remains in the register. Upon the next int1 exception, dr6 presents this manufactured status to the int1 handler in hw_breakpoint.c which calls the non-existent breakpoint exceptions and any handlers which may have validly registered, creating phantom events. If other subsystems which call the perf handlers also have breakpoints registered, this manufactured status causes erroneous events to be signaled to the layers above. arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c static int hw_breakpoint_handler(struct die_args *args) { ... snip ... /* Handle all the breakpoints that were triggered */ for (i = 0; i < HBP_NUM; ++i) { if (likely(!(dr6 & (DR_TRAP0 << i continue; ... snip ... perf_bp_event(bp, args->regs); ... snip ... } After a few iterations of this cycling through the system, the thread.debugreg6 variable starts to resemble a random number generator as far as to which breakpoint just occurred. The perf handlers cause a different incarnation of this problem and create the situation by triggering a stale breakpoint set in dr7 for which the perf bp is NULL (not registered) or late and for which there is a single code path that fails to set the resume flag and clear the int1 exception status. TESTING AND REVIEW PERFORMED I have reviewed all the code that touches this patch and have determined it will function and support all of the software that depends on this handler properly. I have compiled and tested this patch with a test harness that tests the robustness of the linux breakpoint API and handlers in the following ways: 1. Setting multiple conditional breakpoints through arch_install_hw_breakpoint API across four processors to test the rate at which the interface can handle breakpoint exceptions 2. Setting unregistered breakpoints to test the handlers robustness in dealing with error handling conditions and errant or spurious hardware conditions and to simulate actual "lazy debug register switching" with null bp handlers to test the robustness of the handlers. 3. Clearing and setting breakpoints across multiple processors then triggering concurrent exceptions in both interrupt and process contexts. This patch improves robustness in several ways in the linux kernel: 1. Corrects bug in handling unregistered breakpoints. 2. Provides hardware check of dr7 to determine source of breakpoint if OS cannot ascertain the int1 source from its own state