Re: [PATCH v5 WIP 2/5] staging: panel: use new parport device model
Hi Sudip, On Wed, 6 May 2015 15:46:14 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > converted to use the new device-model parallel port. Hmm, leading capital? :-D > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee > --- > drivers/staging/panel/panel.c | 20 +++- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c b/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c > index 1d8ed8b..772a82a 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c > @@ -2188,6 +2188,18 @@ static struct notifier_block panel_notifier = { > 0 > }; > > +static int panel_probe(struct pardevice *par_dev) > +{ > + if (strcmp(par_dev->name, "panel")) > + return -ENODEV; > + return 0; > +} > + > +struct pardev_cb panel_cb = { If this stays there, it should be static. And it could be const as you never modify it. But as with i2c-parport I believe this variable should be local to function panel_attach(). > + .flags = 0, /*PARPORT_DEV_EXCL */ 0/NULL fields don't need to be explicitly initialized. > + .private = , > +}; > + > static void panel_attach(struct parport *port) > { > if (port->number != parport) > @@ -2199,10 +2211,7 @@ static void panel_attach(struct parport *port) > return; > } > > - pprt = parport_register_device(port, "panel", NULL, NULL, /* pf, kf */ > -NULL, > -/*PARPORT_DEV_EXCL */ > -0, (void *)); > + pprt = parport_register_dev_model(port, "panel", _cb, 0); > if (pprt == NULL) { > pr_err("%s: port->number=%d parport=%d, > parport_register_device() failed\n", > __func__, port->number, parport); > @@ -2256,8 +2265,9 @@ static void panel_detach(struct parport *port) > > static struct parport_driver panel_driver = { > .name = "panel", > - .attach = panel_attach, > + .match_port = panel_attach, > .detach = panel_detach, > + .probe = panel_probe, > }; > > /* init function */ -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v5 WIP 2/5] staging: panel: use new parport device model
Hi Sudip, On Wed, 6 May 2015 15:46:14 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: converted to use the new device-model parallel port. Hmm, leading capital? :-D Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee su...@vectorindia.org --- drivers/staging/panel/panel.c | 20 +++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c b/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c index 1d8ed8b..772a82a 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c +++ b/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c @@ -2188,6 +2188,18 @@ static struct notifier_block panel_notifier = { 0 }; +static int panel_probe(struct pardevice *par_dev) +{ + if (strcmp(par_dev-name, panel)) + return -ENODEV; + return 0; +} + +struct pardev_cb panel_cb = { If this stays there, it should be static. And it could be const as you never modify it. But as with i2c-parport I believe this variable should be local to function panel_attach(). + .flags = 0, /*PARPORT_DEV_EXCL */ 0/NULL fields don't need to be explicitly initialized. + .private = pprt, +}; + static void panel_attach(struct parport *port) { if (port-number != parport) @@ -2199,10 +2211,7 @@ static void panel_attach(struct parport *port) return; } - pprt = parport_register_device(port, panel, NULL, NULL, /* pf, kf */ -NULL, -/*PARPORT_DEV_EXCL */ -0, (void *)pprt); + pprt = parport_register_dev_model(port, panel, panel_cb, 0); if (pprt == NULL) { pr_err(%s: port-number=%d parport=%d, parport_register_device() failed\n, __func__, port-number, parport); @@ -2256,8 +2265,9 @@ static void panel_detach(struct parport *port) static struct parport_driver panel_driver = { .name = panel, - .attach = panel_attach, + .match_port = panel_attach, .detach = panel_detach, + .probe = panel_probe, }; /* init function */ -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v5 WIP 2/5] staging: panel: use new parport device model
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:46:14PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > converted to use the new device-model parallel port. > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee > --- > drivers/staging/panel/panel.c | 20 +++- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c b/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c > index 1d8ed8b..772a82a 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c > @@ -2188,6 +2188,18 @@ static struct notifier_block panel_notifier = { > 0 > }; > > +static int panel_probe(struct pardevice *par_dev) > +{ > + if (strcmp(par_dev->name, "panel")) > + return -ENODEV; > + return 0; > +} > + > +struct pardev_cb panel_cb = { > + .flags = 0, /*PARPORT_DEV_EXCL */ I don't understand this comment. PARPORT_DEV_EXCL is BIT(2). Update: Oh, I see this comment is just copied from the earlier code and probably means that it maybe should be set to PARPORT_DEV_EXCL. Just put something like this: .flags = 0, /* should be PARPORT_DEV_EXCL? */ regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v5 WIP 2/5] staging: panel: use new parport device model
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:46:14PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: converted to use the new device-model parallel port. Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee su...@vectorindia.org --- drivers/staging/panel/panel.c | 20 +++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c b/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c index 1d8ed8b..772a82a 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c +++ b/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c @@ -2188,6 +2188,18 @@ static struct notifier_block panel_notifier = { 0 }; +static int panel_probe(struct pardevice *par_dev) +{ + if (strcmp(par_dev-name, panel)) + return -ENODEV; + return 0; +} + +struct pardev_cb panel_cb = { + .flags = 0, /*PARPORT_DEV_EXCL */ I don't understand this comment. PARPORT_DEV_EXCL is BIT(2). Update: Oh, I see this comment is just copied from the earlier code and probably means that it maybe should be set to PARPORT_DEV_EXCL. Just put something like this: .flags = 0, /* should be PARPORT_DEV_EXCL? */ regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH v5 WIP 2/5] staging: panel: use new parport device model
converted to use the new device-model parallel port. Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee --- drivers/staging/panel/panel.c | 20 +++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c b/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c index 1d8ed8b..772a82a 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c +++ b/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c @@ -2188,6 +2188,18 @@ static struct notifier_block panel_notifier = { 0 }; +static int panel_probe(struct pardevice *par_dev) +{ + if (strcmp(par_dev->name, "panel")) + return -ENODEV; + return 0; +} + +struct pardev_cb panel_cb = { + .flags = 0, /*PARPORT_DEV_EXCL */ + .private = , +}; + static void panel_attach(struct parport *port) { if (port->number != parport) @@ -2199,10 +2211,7 @@ static void panel_attach(struct parport *port) return; } - pprt = parport_register_device(port, "panel", NULL, NULL, /* pf, kf */ - NULL, - /*PARPORT_DEV_EXCL */ - 0, (void *)); + pprt = parport_register_dev_model(port, "panel", _cb, 0); if (pprt == NULL) { pr_err("%s: port->number=%d parport=%d, parport_register_device() failed\n", __func__, port->number, parport); @@ -2256,8 +2265,9 @@ static void panel_detach(struct parport *port) static struct parport_driver panel_driver = { .name = "panel", - .attach = panel_attach, + .match_port = panel_attach, .detach = panel_detach, + .probe = panel_probe, }; /* init function */ -- 1.8.1.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH v5 WIP 2/5] staging: panel: use new parport device model
converted to use the new device-model parallel port. Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee su...@vectorindia.org --- drivers/staging/panel/panel.c | 20 +++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c b/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c index 1d8ed8b..772a82a 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c +++ b/drivers/staging/panel/panel.c @@ -2188,6 +2188,18 @@ static struct notifier_block panel_notifier = { 0 }; +static int panel_probe(struct pardevice *par_dev) +{ + if (strcmp(par_dev-name, panel)) + return -ENODEV; + return 0; +} + +struct pardev_cb panel_cb = { + .flags = 0, /*PARPORT_DEV_EXCL */ + .private = pprt, +}; + static void panel_attach(struct parport *port) { if (port-number != parport) @@ -2199,10 +2211,7 @@ static void panel_attach(struct parport *port) return; } - pprt = parport_register_device(port, panel, NULL, NULL, /* pf, kf */ - NULL, - /*PARPORT_DEV_EXCL */ - 0, (void *)pprt); + pprt = parport_register_dev_model(port, panel, panel_cb, 0); if (pprt == NULL) { pr_err(%s: port-number=%d parport=%d, parport_register_device() failed\n, __func__, port-number, parport); @@ -2256,8 +2265,9 @@ static void panel_detach(struct parport *port) static struct parport_driver panel_driver = { .name = panel, - .attach = panel_attach, + .match_port = panel_attach, .detach = panel_detach, + .probe = panel_probe, }; /* init function */ -- 1.8.1.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/