Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
At Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:07:45 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:22:40PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote: > [ ... ] > > > > OK. > > I made h8300-*-linux target patch for release version. > > Please apply and rebuild to "h8300-unknown-linux" > > http://sourceforge.jp/projects/uclinux-h8/releases/p14625 > > > > My toolchain configure options bellow > > * binutils > > ../configure --prefix=/home/ysato/h8-linux --target=h8300-unknown-linux > > > > * gcc > > ../configure --target=h8300-unknown-linux --prefix=/home/ysato/h8-linux \ > > --disable-ssp --disable-libssp --disable-mpc --disable-gmp --disable-mpfr \ > > --disable-threads --disable-shared --disable-libmudflap --disable-libgomp \ > > --disable-zlib --disable-libquadmath --without-libc --disable-libatomic \ > > --enable-languages=c > > > Compilation passes with those patches - thanks a lot! > > I get lots of warnings if I compile with C=1. Might be worthwhile looking at > those. It might also be a good idea to provide the functions found missing > when building "make allyesconfig". > > Thanks, > Guenter OK. I trying allyesconfig. Thanks. -- Yoshinori Sato -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:22:40PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote: [ ... ] > > OK. > I made h8300-*-linux target patch for release version. > Please apply and rebuild to "h8300-unknown-linux" > http://sourceforge.jp/projects/uclinux-h8/releases/p14625 > > My toolchain configure options bellow > * binutils > ../configure --prefix=/home/ysato/h8-linux --target=h8300-unknown-linux > > * gcc > ../configure --target=h8300-unknown-linux --prefix=/home/ysato/h8-linux \ > --disable-ssp --disable-libssp --disable-mpc --disable-gmp --disable-mpfr \ > --disable-threads --disable-shared --disable-libmudflap --disable-libgomp \ > --disable-zlib --disable-libquadmath --without-libc --disable-libatomic \ > --enable-languages=c > Compilation passes with those patches - thanks a lot! I get lots of warnings if I compile with C=1. Might be worthwhile looking at those. It might also be a good idea to provide the functions found missing when building "make allyesconfig". Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
On 04/28/2015 11:22 PM, Yoshinori Sato wrote: OK. I made h8300-*-linux target patch for release version. Please apply and rebuild to "h8300-unknown-linux" http://sourceforge.jp/projects/uclinux-h8/releases/p14625 The binutils patch is similar to the one upstream, but I think you might want to check if the latest upstream code is still working as intended. The patch was later augmented with 'Fix recent h8300 configury changes' which, among other changes, removed the GENSCRIPTS lines. Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
At Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:33:12 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 04/28/2015 10:25 AM, Yoshinori Sato wrote: > > At Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:22:10 -0700, > > Guenter Roeck wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:35:07PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote: > >>> Hello. > >>> I will re-introducing h8300. > >>> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> can you provide a link to a working toolchain, or provide directions > >> on how to build one ? > > > > h8300-unknown-linux in gcc / binutils development version. > > Patch of a release version has not been prepared yet. > > > > Hi, > > With a toolchain based on binutils 2.25 (patched), gcc 5.1 (unpatched), and > newlib 1.20 > (unpatched), I get for both h8300h-sim_defconfig and h8s-sim_defconfig: > > ./arch/h8300/kernel/vmlinux.lds:247: undefined symbol `jiffies_64' referenced > in expression > > I had to modify arch/h8300/Makefile a bit since the linker does not understand > -mh8300helf_linux and -mh8300self_linux; I had to use -mh8300helf and > -mh8300self > instead. Maybe I am missing a binutils patch. I also had to use > h8300-linux-elf > as target to convince gcc to accept it as valid target. Both should not result > in the undefined symbol error, though. OK. I made h8300-*-linux target patch for release version. Please apply and rebuild to "h8300-unknown-linux" http://sourceforge.jp/projects/uclinux-h8/releases/p14625 My toolchain configure options bellow * binutils ../configure --prefix=/home/ysato/h8-linux --target=h8300-unknown-linux * gcc ../configure --target=h8300-unknown-linux --prefix=/home/ysato/h8-linux \ --disable-ssp --disable-libssp --disable-mpc --disable-gmp --disable-mpfr \ --disable-threads --disable-shared --disable-libmudflap --disable-libgomp \ --disable-zlib --disable-libquadmath --without-libc --disable-libatomic \ --enable-languages=c Thanks. > Guenter > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
At Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:33:12 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 04/28/2015 10:25 AM, Yoshinori Sato wrote: At Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:22:10 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:35:07PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote: Hello. I will re-introducing h8300. Hi, can you provide a link to a working toolchain, or provide directions on how to build one ? h8300-unknown-linux in gcc / binutils development version. Patch of a release version has not been prepared yet. Hi, With a toolchain based on binutils 2.25 (patched), gcc 5.1 (unpatched), and newlib 1.20 (unpatched), I get for both h8300h-sim_defconfig and h8s-sim_defconfig: ./arch/h8300/kernel/vmlinux.lds:247: undefined symbol `jiffies_64' referenced in expression I had to modify arch/h8300/Makefile a bit since the linker does not understand -mh8300helf_linux and -mh8300self_linux; I had to use -mh8300helf and -mh8300self instead. Maybe I am missing a binutils patch. I also had to use h8300-linux-elf as target to convince gcc to accept it as valid target. Both should not result in the undefined symbol error, though. OK. I made h8300-*-linux target patch for release version. Please apply and rebuild to h8300-unknown-linux http://sourceforge.jp/projects/uclinux-h8/releases/p14625 My toolchain configure options bellow * binutils ../configure --prefix=/home/ysato/h8-linux --target=h8300-unknown-linux * gcc ../configure --target=h8300-unknown-linux --prefix=/home/ysato/h8-linux \ --disable-ssp --disable-libssp --disable-mpc --disable-gmp --disable-mpfr \ --disable-threads --disable-shared --disable-libmudflap --disable-libgomp \ --disable-zlib --disable-libquadmath --without-libc --disable-libatomic \ --enable-languages=c Thanks. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-arch in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:22:40PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote: [ ... ] OK. I made h8300-*-linux target patch for release version. Please apply and rebuild to h8300-unknown-linux http://sourceforge.jp/projects/uclinux-h8/releases/p14625 My toolchain configure options bellow * binutils ../configure --prefix=/home/ysato/h8-linux --target=h8300-unknown-linux * gcc ../configure --target=h8300-unknown-linux --prefix=/home/ysato/h8-linux \ --disable-ssp --disable-libssp --disable-mpc --disable-gmp --disable-mpfr \ --disable-threads --disable-shared --disable-libmudflap --disable-libgomp \ --disable-zlib --disable-libquadmath --without-libc --disable-libatomic \ --enable-languages=c Compilation passes with those patches - thanks a lot! I get lots of warnings if I compile with C=1. Might be worthwhile looking at those. It might also be a good idea to provide the functions found missing when building make allyesconfig. Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
On 04/28/2015 11:22 PM, Yoshinori Sato wrote: OK. I made h8300-*-linux target patch for release version. Please apply and rebuild to h8300-unknown-linux http://sourceforge.jp/projects/uclinux-h8/releases/p14625 The binutils patch is similar to the one upstream, but I think you might want to check if the latest upstream code is still working as intended. The patch was later augmented with 'Fix recent h8300 configury changes' which, among other changes, removed the GENSCRIPTS lines. Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
At Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:07:45 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:22:40PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote: [ ... ] OK. I made h8300-*-linux target patch for release version. Please apply and rebuild to h8300-unknown-linux http://sourceforge.jp/projects/uclinux-h8/releases/p14625 My toolchain configure options bellow * binutils ../configure --prefix=/home/ysato/h8-linux --target=h8300-unknown-linux * gcc ../configure --target=h8300-unknown-linux --prefix=/home/ysato/h8-linux \ --disable-ssp --disable-libssp --disable-mpc --disable-gmp --disable-mpfr \ --disable-threads --disable-shared --disable-libmudflap --disable-libgomp \ --disable-zlib --disable-libquadmath --without-libc --disable-libatomic \ --enable-languages=c Compilation passes with those patches - thanks a lot! I get lots of warnings if I compile with C=1. Might be worthwhile looking at those. It might also be a good idea to provide the functions found missing when building make allyesconfig. Thanks, Guenter OK. I trying allyesconfig. Thanks. -- Yoshinori Sato ys...@users.sourceforge.jp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
On 04/28/2015 09:33 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 04/28/2015 10:25 AM, Yoshinori Sato wrote: At Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:22:10 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:35:07PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote: Hello. I will re-introducing h8300. Hi, can you provide a link to a working toolchain, or provide directions on how to build one ? h8300-unknown-linux in gcc / binutils development version. Patch of a release version has not been prepared yet. Hi, With a toolchain based on binutils 2.25 (patched), gcc 5.1 (unpatched), and newlib 1.20 (unpatched), I get for both h8300h-sim_defconfig and h8s-sim_defconfig: ./arch/h8300/kernel/vmlinux.lds:247: undefined symbol `jiffies_64' referenced in expression I had to modify arch/h8300/Makefile a bit since the linker does not understand -mh8300helf_linux and -mh8300self_linux; I had to use -mh8300helf and -mh8300self instead. Maybe I am missing a binutils patch. I also had to use h8300-linux-elf as target to convince gcc to accept it as valid target. Both should not result in the undefined symbol error, though. Also, a build after "make allyesconfig" shows a few missing functions. writel_relaxed readl_relaxed ioread32be iowrite32be I should have mentioned that I used branch 'h8300' of git://git.sourceforge.jp/gitroot/uclinux-h8/linux.git for the build tests. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
On 04/28/2015 10:25 AM, Yoshinori Sato wrote: At Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:22:10 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:35:07PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote: Hello. I will re-introducing h8300. Hi, can you provide a link to a working toolchain, or provide directions on how to build one ? h8300-unknown-linux in gcc / binutils development version. Patch of a release version has not been prepared yet. Hi, With a toolchain based on binutils 2.25 (patched), gcc 5.1 (unpatched), and newlib 1.20 (unpatched), I get for both h8300h-sim_defconfig and h8s-sim_defconfig: ./arch/h8300/kernel/vmlinux.lds:247: undefined symbol `jiffies_64' referenced in expression I had to modify arch/h8300/Makefile a bit since the linker does not understand -mh8300helf_linux and -mh8300self_linux; I had to use -mh8300helf and -mh8300self instead. Maybe I am missing a binutils patch. I also had to use h8300-linux-elf as target to convince gcc to accept it as valid target. Both should not result in the undefined symbol error, though. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
At Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:22:10 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:35:07PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote: > > Hello. > > I will re-introducing h8300. > > > > Hi, > > can you provide a link to a working toolchain, or provide directions > on how to build one ? h8300-unknown-linux in gcc / binutils development version. Patch of a release version has not been prepared yet. > Thanks, > Guenter > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Yoshinori Sato -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:35:07PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote: > Hello. > I will re-introducing h8300. > Hi, can you provide a link to a working toolchain, or provide directions on how to build one ? Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
At Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:11:28 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Monday 27 April 2015 14:35:07 Yoshinori Sato wrote: > > Hello. > > I will re-introducing h8300. > > > > I've done one more pass through all of your code. Generally I think you > should at this point ask Stephen Rothwell to add your git tree to linux-next, > and not rewrite the patches any more but instead add patches on top to fix > the remaining issues. OK. > My comments are in several areas: > > - device initialization. This should be updated to use a more modern version > and replace the use of early_platform and static platform_device > definitions. > Hmm... A variant isn't probably added, so I think there are no advantages that DeviceTree is adopted. It's considered. > - asm/io.h needs should be rethought OK. > - header files that are functionally identical to the asm-generic variant > and could be replaced with a 'generic-y' Makefile statement OK. > I think all of these should be addressed, but they are not big issues that > would stop you from merging the code in linux-4.2. > > Arnd Thanks. -- Yoshinori Sato -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:35:07PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote: Hello. I will re-introducing h8300. Hi, can you provide a link to a working toolchain, or provide directions on how to build one ? Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
On 04/28/2015 09:33 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 04/28/2015 10:25 AM, Yoshinori Sato wrote: At Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:22:10 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:35:07PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote: Hello. I will re-introducing h8300. Hi, can you provide a link to a working toolchain, or provide directions on how to build one ? h8300-unknown-linux in gcc / binutils development version. Patch of a release version has not been prepared yet. Hi, With a toolchain based on binutils 2.25 (patched), gcc 5.1 (unpatched), and newlib 1.20 (unpatched), I get for both h8300h-sim_defconfig and h8s-sim_defconfig: ./arch/h8300/kernel/vmlinux.lds:247: undefined symbol `jiffies_64' referenced in expression I had to modify arch/h8300/Makefile a bit since the linker does not understand -mh8300helf_linux and -mh8300self_linux; I had to use -mh8300helf and -mh8300self instead. Maybe I am missing a binutils patch. I also had to use h8300-linux-elf as target to convince gcc to accept it as valid target. Both should not result in the undefined symbol error, though. Also, a build after make allyesconfig shows a few missing functions. writel_relaxed readl_relaxed ioread32be iowrite32be I should have mentioned that I used branch 'h8300' of git://git.sourceforge.jp/gitroot/uclinux-h8/linux.git for the build tests. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
On 04/28/2015 10:25 AM, Yoshinori Sato wrote: At Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:22:10 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:35:07PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote: Hello. I will re-introducing h8300. Hi, can you provide a link to a working toolchain, or provide directions on how to build one ? h8300-unknown-linux in gcc / binutils development version. Patch of a release version has not been prepared yet. Hi, With a toolchain based on binutils 2.25 (patched), gcc 5.1 (unpatched), and newlib 1.20 (unpatched), I get for both h8300h-sim_defconfig and h8s-sim_defconfig: ./arch/h8300/kernel/vmlinux.lds:247: undefined symbol `jiffies_64' referenced in expression I had to modify arch/h8300/Makefile a bit since the linker does not understand -mh8300helf_linux and -mh8300self_linux; I had to use -mh8300helf and -mh8300self instead. Maybe I am missing a binutils patch. I also had to use h8300-linux-elf as target to convince gcc to accept it as valid target. Both should not result in the undefined symbol error, though. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
At Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:22:10 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:35:07PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote: Hello. I will re-introducing h8300. Hi, can you provide a link to a working toolchain, or provide directions on how to build one ? h8300-unknown-linux in gcc / binutils development version. Patch of a release version has not been prepared yet. Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Yoshinori Sato ys...@users.sourceforge.jp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
At Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:11:28 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Monday 27 April 2015 14:35:07 Yoshinori Sato wrote: Hello. I will re-introducing h8300. I've done one more pass through all of your code. Generally I think you should at this point ask Stephen Rothwell to add your git tree to linux-next, and not rewrite the patches any more but instead add patches on top to fix the remaining issues. OK. My comments are in several areas: - device initialization. This should be updated to use a more modern version and replace the use of early_platform and static platform_device definitions. Hmm... A variant isn't probably added, so I think there are no advantages that DeviceTree is adopted. It's considered. - asm/io.h needs should be rethought OK. - header files that are functionally identical to the asm-generic variant and could be replaced with a 'generic-y' Makefile statement OK. I think all of these should be addressed, but they are not big issues that would stop you from merging the code in linux-4.2. Arnd Thanks. -- Yoshinori Sato ys...@users.sourceforge.jp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
On Monday 27 April 2015 14:35:07 Yoshinori Sato wrote: > Hello. > I will re-introducing h8300. > I've done one more pass through all of your code. Generally I think you should at this point ask Stephen Rothwell to add your git tree to linux-next, and not rewrite the patches any more but instead add patches on top to fix the remaining issues. My comments are in several areas: - device initialization. This should be updated to use a more modern version and replace the use of early_platform and static platform_device definitions. - asm/io.h needs should be rethought - header files that are functionally identical to the asm-generic variant and could be replaced with a 'generic-y' Makefile statement I think all of these should be addressed, but they are not big issues that would stop you from merging the code in linux-4.2. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
On Monday 27 April 2015 14:35:07 Yoshinori Sato wrote: Hello. I will re-introducing h8300. I've done one more pass through all of your code. Generally I think you should at this point ask Stephen Rothwell to add your git tree to linux-next, and not rewrite the patches any more but instead add patches on top to fix the remaining issues. My comments are in several areas: - device initialization. This should be updated to use a more modern version and replace the use of early_platform and static platform_device definitions. - asm/io.h needs should be rethought - header files that are functionally identical to the asm-generic variant and could be replaced with a 'generic-y' Makefile statement I think all of these should be addressed, but they are not big issues that would stop you from merging the code in linux-4.2. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
Hello. I will re-introducing h8300. Changes for v9 - remove exec domain - timer update - rebase to v4.1-rc1 Changes for v8 - rebase to v4.0 Changes for v7 - Add MAINTAINERS Changes for v6 - rebase to v4.0-rc3 - remove unused headers - optimized atomic operation - System.map cleanup Changes for v5 - Signal handling fix - LD script cleanup Changes for v4 - Remove signal mapping - Organize Kconfig - Coding style fix Changes for v3 - Fix clone - Add dma functions - Add missing library - Fix various errors Changes for v2 - Use Common Clock Framework - Use common unistd.h - Use common ptrace function - clocksource driver move to drivers/clocksource - some cleanup Changes for latest relase (v3.12) - standard ELF toolchain (h8300-linux) - use common driver support - exception handling fix - too many cleanup git repository git://git.sourceforge.jp/gitroot/uclinux-h8/linux.git h8300 Yoshinori Sato (17): h8300: Assembly headers. h8300: UAPI headers h8300: Exception and Interrupt handling h8300: kernel booting h8300: process and signals h8300: CPU depend helpers h8300: miscellaneous functions h8300: Memory management h8300: library functions h8300: Build scripts h8300: clock driver h8300: clocksource h8300: configs serial: Add H8300. Add ELF machine mksysmap: Add h8300 local symbol pattern Add H8/300 entry CREDITS| 5 - MAINTAINERS| 11 + arch/h8300/Kconfig | 73 + arch/h8300/Kconfig.cpu | 111 arch/h8300/Makefile| 45 arch/h8300/boot/Makefile | 26 ++ arch/h8300/boot/compressed/Makefile| 37 +++ arch/h8300/boot/compressed/head.S | 48 arch/h8300/boot/compressed/misc.c | 74 ++ arch/h8300/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds | 32 +++ arch/h8300/boot/compressed/vmlinux.scr | 9 + arch/h8300/configs/h8300h-sim_defconfig| 53 arch/h8300/configs/h8s-sim_defconfig | 53 arch/h8300/include/asm/Kbuild | 66 + arch/h8300/include/asm/asm-offsets.h | 1 + arch/h8300/include/asm/atomic.h| 159 +++ arch/h8300/include/asm/bitops.h| 185 + arch/h8300/include/asm/bootparams.h| 17 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/bug.h | 12 + arch/h8300/include/asm/cache.h | 11 + arch/h8300/include/asm/checksum.h | 102 +++ arch/h8300/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 65 + arch/h8300/include/asm/delay.h | 38 +++ arch/h8300/include/asm/device.h| 6 + arch/h8300/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 124 + arch/h8300/include/asm/elf.h | 101 +++ arch/h8300/include/asm/emergency-restart.h | 6 + arch/h8300/include/asm/flat.h | 27 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/io.h| 314 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/irq.h | 26 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/irqflags.h | 96 +++ arch/h8300/include/asm/mc146818rtc.h | 9 + arch/h8300/include/asm/mutex.h | 9 + arch/h8300/include/asm/page.h | 18 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/page_offset.h | 2 + arch/h8300/include/asm/pci.h | 19 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/pgtable.h | 49 arch/h8300/include/asm/processor.h | 144 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/ptrace.h| 36 +++ arch/h8300/include/asm/segment.h | 49 arch/h8300/include/asm/signal.h| 22 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/smp.h | 1 + arch/h8300/include/asm/spinlock.h | 6 + arch/h8300/include/asm/string.h| 17 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/switch_to.h | 51 arch/h8300/include/asm/syscall.h | 56 arch/h8300/include/asm/thread_info.h | 108 arch/h8300/include/asm/timer.h | 31 +++ arch/h8300/include/asm/tlb.h | 8 + arch/h8300/include/asm/topology.h | 6 + arch/h8300/include/asm/traps.h | 41 +++ arch/h8300/include/asm/uaccess.h | 136 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/unaligned.h | 11 + arch/h8300/include/asm/user.h | 74 ++ arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild | 29 ++ arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/auxvec.h | 4 + arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/byteorder.h| 6 + arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 42 +++ arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h | 18 ++ arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/signal.h | 115 arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/swab.h | 1 + arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h | 3 + arch/h8300/kernel/Makefile | 16 ++ arch/h8300/kernel/asm-offsets.c| 67 + arch/h8300/kernel/cpu/Makefile | 4 + arch/h8300/kernel/cpu/h83069/Makefile | 1 +
[PATCH v9 00/17] Re-introduce h8300 architecture
Hello. I will re-introducing h8300. Changes for v9 - remove exec domain - timer update - rebase to v4.1-rc1 Changes for v8 - rebase to v4.0 Changes for v7 - Add MAINTAINERS Changes for v6 - rebase to v4.0-rc3 - remove unused headers - optimized atomic operation - System.map cleanup Changes for v5 - Signal handling fix - LD script cleanup Changes for v4 - Remove signal mapping - Organize Kconfig - Coding style fix Changes for v3 - Fix clone - Add dma functions - Add missing library - Fix various errors Changes for v2 - Use Common Clock Framework - Use common unistd.h - Use common ptrace function - clocksource driver move to drivers/clocksource - some cleanup Changes for latest relase (v3.12) - standard ELF toolchain (h8300-linux) - use common driver support - exception handling fix - too many cleanup git repository git://git.sourceforge.jp/gitroot/uclinux-h8/linux.git h8300 Yoshinori Sato (17): h8300: Assembly headers. h8300: UAPI headers h8300: Exception and Interrupt handling h8300: kernel booting h8300: process and signals h8300: CPU depend helpers h8300: miscellaneous functions h8300: Memory management h8300: library functions h8300: Build scripts h8300: clock driver h8300: clocksource h8300: configs serial: Add H8300. Add ELF machine mksysmap: Add h8300 local symbol pattern Add H8/300 entry CREDITS| 5 - MAINTAINERS| 11 + arch/h8300/Kconfig | 73 + arch/h8300/Kconfig.cpu | 111 arch/h8300/Makefile| 45 arch/h8300/boot/Makefile | 26 ++ arch/h8300/boot/compressed/Makefile| 37 +++ arch/h8300/boot/compressed/head.S | 48 arch/h8300/boot/compressed/misc.c | 74 ++ arch/h8300/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds | 32 +++ arch/h8300/boot/compressed/vmlinux.scr | 9 + arch/h8300/configs/h8300h-sim_defconfig| 53 arch/h8300/configs/h8s-sim_defconfig | 53 arch/h8300/include/asm/Kbuild | 66 + arch/h8300/include/asm/asm-offsets.h | 1 + arch/h8300/include/asm/atomic.h| 159 +++ arch/h8300/include/asm/bitops.h| 185 + arch/h8300/include/asm/bootparams.h| 17 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/bug.h | 12 + arch/h8300/include/asm/cache.h | 11 + arch/h8300/include/asm/checksum.h | 102 +++ arch/h8300/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 65 + arch/h8300/include/asm/delay.h | 38 +++ arch/h8300/include/asm/device.h| 6 + arch/h8300/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 124 + arch/h8300/include/asm/elf.h | 101 +++ arch/h8300/include/asm/emergency-restart.h | 6 + arch/h8300/include/asm/flat.h | 27 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/io.h| 314 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/irq.h | 26 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/irqflags.h | 96 +++ arch/h8300/include/asm/mc146818rtc.h | 9 + arch/h8300/include/asm/mutex.h | 9 + arch/h8300/include/asm/page.h | 18 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/page_offset.h | 2 + arch/h8300/include/asm/pci.h | 19 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/pgtable.h | 49 arch/h8300/include/asm/processor.h | 144 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/ptrace.h| 36 +++ arch/h8300/include/asm/segment.h | 49 arch/h8300/include/asm/signal.h| 22 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/smp.h | 1 + arch/h8300/include/asm/spinlock.h | 6 + arch/h8300/include/asm/string.h| 17 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/switch_to.h | 51 arch/h8300/include/asm/syscall.h | 56 arch/h8300/include/asm/thread_info.h | 108 arch/h8300/include/asm/timer.h | 31 +++ arch/h8300/include/asm/tlb.h | 8 + arch/h8300/include/asm/topology.h | 6 + arch/h8300/include/asm/traps.h | 41 +++ arch/h8300/include/asm/uaccess.h | 136 ++ arch/h8300/include/asm/unaligned.h | 11 + arch/h8300/include/asm/user.h | 74 ++ arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild | 29 ++ arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/auxvec.h | 4 + arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/byteorder.h| 6 + arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 42 +++ arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h | 18 ++ arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/signal.h | 115 arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/swab.h | 1 + arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h | 3 + arch/h8300/kernel/Makefile | 16 ++ arch/h8300/kernel/asm-offsets.c| 67 + arch/h8300/kernel/cpu/Makefile | 4 + arch/h8300/kernel/cpu/h83069/Makefile | 1 +
