Re: [PATCHv2] dmaengine: dmatest: Remove use of VLAs

2018-04-16 Thread Vinod Koul
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 06:02:16PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> There's an ongoing effort to remove VLAs from the kernel
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621) to eventually turn on -Wvla.
> The test already pre-allocates some buffers with kmalloc so turn
> the two VLAs in to pre-allocated kmalloc buffers.

Applied, thanks

-- 
~Vinod


Re: [PATCHv2] dmaengine: dmatest: Remove use of VLAs

2018-04-16 Thread Vinod Koul
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 06:02:16PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> There's an ongoing effort to remove VLAs from the kernel
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621) to eventually turn on -Wvla.
> The test already pre-allocates some buffers with kmalloc so turn
> the two VLAs in to pre-allocated kmalloc buffers.

Applied, thanks

-- 
~Vinod


Re: [PATCHv2] dmaengine: dmatest: Remove use of VLAs

2018-04-11 Thread Sinan Kaya
On 4/10/2018 9:02 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> There's an ongoing effort to remove VLAs from the kernel
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621) to eventually turn on -Wvla.
> The test already pre-allocates some buffers with kmalloc so turn
> the two VLAs in to pre-allocated kmalloc buffers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott 
> ---
> v2: Switch to using kmalloc buffers instead of putting a large array on
> the stack.
> ---
>  drivers/dma/dmatest.c | 16 +---
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Sinan Kaya 


-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm 
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux 
Foundation Collaborative Project.


Re: [PATCHv2] dmaengine: dmatest: Remove use of VLAs

2018-04-11 Thread Sinan Kaya
On 4/10/2018 9:02 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> There's an ongoing effort to remove VLAs from the kernel
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621) to eventually turn on -Wvla.
> The test already pre-allocates some buffers with kmalloc so turn
> the two VLAs in to pre-allocated kmalloc buffers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott 
> ---
> v2: Switch to using kmalloc buffers instead of putting a large array on
> the stack.
> ---
>  drivers/dma/dmatest.c | 16 +---
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Sinan Kaya 


-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm 
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux 
Foundation Collaborative Project.


[PATCHv2] dmaengine: dmatest: Remove use of VLAs

2018-04-10 Thread Laura Abbott
There's an ongoing effort to remove VLAs from the kernel
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621) to eventually turn on -Wvla.
The test already pre-allocates some buffers with kmalloc so turn
the two VLAs in to pre-allocated kmalloc buffers.

Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott 
---
v2: Switch to using kmalloc buffers instead of putting a large array on
the stack.
---
 drivers/dma/dmatest.c | 16 +---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmatest.c b/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
index 80cc2be6483c..9730956dfbe3 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
@@ -463,6 +463,8 @@ static int dmatest_func(void *data)
unsigned long long  total_len = 0;
u8  align = 0;
boolis_memset = false;
+   dma_addr_t  *srcs;
+   dma_addr_t  *dma_pq;
 
set_freezable();
 
@@ -546,6 +548,14 @@ static int dmatest_func(void *data)
 
set_user_nice(current, 10);
 
+   srcs = kcalloc(src_cnt, sizeof(dma_addr_t), GFP_KERNEL);
+   if (!srcs)
+   goto err_dstbuf;
+
+   dma_pq = kcalloc(dst_cnt, sizeof(dma_addr_t), GFP_KERNEL);
+   if (!dma_pq)
+   goto err_srcs_array;
+
/*
 * src and dst buffers are freed by ourselves below
 */
@@ -556,7 +566,6 @@ static int dmatest_func(void *data)
   && !(params->iterations && total_tests >= params->iterations)) {
struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx = NULL;
struct dmaengine_unmap_data *um;
-   dma_addr_t srcs[src_cnt];
dma_addr_t *dsts;
unsigned int src_off, dst_off, len;
 
@@ -669,8 +678,6 @@ static int dmatest_func(void *data)
  srcs, src_cnt,
  len, flags);
else if (thread->type == DMA_PQ) {
-   dma_addr_t dma_pq[dst_cnt];
-
for (i = 0; i < dst_cnt; i++)
dma_pq[i] = dsts[i] + dst_off;
tx = dev->device_prep_dma_pq(chan, dma_pq, srcs,
@@ -772,6 +779,9 @@ static int dmatest_func(void *data)
runtime = ktime_to_us(ktime);
 
ret = 0;
+   kfree(dma_pq);
+err_srcs_array:
+   kfree(srcs);
 err_dstbuf:
for (i = 0; thread->udsts[i]; i++)
kfree(thread->udsts[i]);
-- 
2.14.3



[PATCHv2] dmaengine: dmatest: Remove use of VLAs

2018-04-10 Thread Laura Abbott
There's an ongoing effort to remove VLAs from the kernel
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621) to eventually turn on -Wvla.
The test already pre-allocates some buffers with kmalloc so turn
the two VLAs in to pre-allocated kmalloc buffers.

Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott 
---
v2: Switch to using kmalloc buffers instead of putting a large array on
the stack.
---
 drivers/dma/dmatest.c | 16 +---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmatest.c b/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
index 80cc2be6483c..9730956dfbe3 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
@@ -463,6 +463,8 @@ static int dmatest_func(void *data)
unsigned long long  total_len = 0;
u8  align = 0;
boolis_memset = false;
+   dma_addr_t  *srcs;
+   dma_addr_t  *dma_pq;
 
set_freezable();
 
@@ -546,6 +548,14 @@ static int dmatest_func(void *data)
 
set_user_nice(current, 10);
 
+   srcs = kcalloc(src_cnt, sizeof(dma_addr_t), GFP_KERNEL);
+   if (!srcs)
+   goto err_dstbuf;
+
+   dma_pq = kcalloc(dst_cnt, sizeof(dma_addr_t), GFP_KERNEL);
+   if (!dma_pq)
+   goto err_srcs_array;
+
/*
 * src and dst buffers are freed by ourselves below
 */
@@ -556,7 +566,6 @@ static int dmatest_func(void *data)
   && !(params->iterations && total_tests >= params->iterations)) {
struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx = NULL;
struct dmaengine_unmap_data *um;
-   dma_addr_t srcs[src_cnt];
dma_addr_t *dsts;
unsigned int src_off, dst_off, len;
 
@@ -669,8 +678,6 @@ static int dmatest_func(void *data)
  srcs, src_cnt,
  len, flags);
else if (thread->type == DMA_PQ) {
-   dma_addr_t dma_pq[dst_cnt];
-
for (i = 0; i < dst_cnt; i++)
dma_pq[i] = dsts[i] + dst_off;
tx = dev->device_prep_dma_pq(chan, dma_pq, srcs,
@@ -772,6 +779,9 @@ static int dmatest_func(void *data)
runtime = ktime_to_us(ktime);
 
ret = 0;
+   kfree(dma_pq);
+err_srcs_array:
+   kfree(srcs);
 err_dstbuf:
for (i = 0; thread->udsts[i]; i++)
kfree(thread->udsts[i]);
-- 
2.14.3