Re: [PATCHv5 1/3] mfd: sec-core: Add support for S2MPU02 device
Hi Lee,
On 06/16/2014 10:03 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>
>> Add support for Samsung S2MPU02 PMIC device to the MFD sec-core driver.
>> The S2MPU02 device includes PMIC/RTC/Clock devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/sec-core.c | 19 +
>> drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c| 88
>>
>> include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h | 1 +
>> include/linux/mfd/samsung/irq.h | 24 +++
>> 4 files changed, 132 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
>> index be06d0a..5e8784b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
>> @@ -89,6 +89,17 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mpa01_devs[] = {
>> },
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct mfd_cell s2mpu02_devs[] = {
>> +{
>> +.name = "s2mpu02-pmic",
>> +}, {
>> +.name = "s2mpu02-rtc",
>
> Make these two one liners, so:
>
> { .name = "s2mpu02-pmic" },
> { .name = "s2mpu02-rtc" ),
OK, I'll modify it.
>
>> +}, {
>> +.name = "s2mpu02-clk",
>> +.of_compatible = "samsung,s2mpu02-clk",
>> +}
>> +};
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> static const struct of_device_id sec_dt_match[] = {
>> { .compatible = "samsung,s5m8767-pmic",
>> @@ -103,6 +114,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id sec_dt_match[] = {
>> .compatible = "samsung,s2mpa01-pmic",
>> .data = (void *)S2MPA01,
>> }, {
>> +.compatible = "samsung,s2mpu02-pmic",
>> +.data = (void *)S2MPU02,
>> +}, {
>> /* Sentinel */
>> },
>> };
>> @@ -342,6 +356,11 @@ static int sec_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
>> ret = mfd_add_devices(sec_pmic->dev, -1, s2mps14_devs,
>>ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps14_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
>> break;
>> +case S2MPU02:
>> +ret = mfd_add_devices(sec_pmic->dev, -1, s2mpu02_devs,
>> + ARRAY_SIZE(s2mpu02_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
>> +break;
>
> This is a bit bonkers. Instead of passing S2MPU02, why don't you pass
> a new container which holds s2mpu02_devs and s2mpu02_irq_chip, then
> you won't need new mfd_add_devices() and regmap_add_irq_chip() calls
> for every device you want to support.
OK, I'll remove duplicate code of mfd_add_devices() and regmap_add_irq_chip().
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCHv5 1/3] mfd: sec-core: Add support for S2MPU02 device
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Add support for Samsung S2MPU02 PMIC device to the MFD sec-core driver.
> The S2MPU02 device includes PMIC/RTC/Clock devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
> ---
> drivers/mfd/sec-core.c | 19 +
> drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c| 88
>
> include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h | 1 +
> include/linux/mfd/samsung/irq.h | 24 +++
> 4 files changed, 132 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> index be06d0a..5e8784b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,17 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mpa01_devs[] = {
> },
> };
>
> +static const struct mfd_cell s2mpu02_devs[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "s2mpu02-pmic",
> + }, {
> + .name = "s2mpu02-rtc",
Make these two one liners, so:
{ .name = "s2mpu02-pmic" },
{ .name = "s2mpu02-rtc" ),
> + }, {
> + .name = "s2mpu02-clk",
> + .of_compatible = "samsung,s2mpu02-clk",
> + }
> +};
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> static const struct of_device_id sec_dt_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "samsung,s5m8767-pmic",
> @@ -103,6 +114,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id sec_dt_match[] = {
> .compatible = "samsung,s2mpa01-pmic",
> .data = (void *)S2MPA01,
> }, {
> + .compatible = "samsung,s2mpu02-pmic",
> + .data = (void *)S2MPU02,
> + }, {
> /* Sentinel */
> },
> };
> @@ -342,6 +356,11 @@ static int sec_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
> ret = mfd_add_devices(sec_pmic->dev, -1, s2mps14_devs,
> ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps14_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
> break;
> + case S2MPU02:
> + ret = mfd_add_devices(sec_pmic->dev, -1, s2mpu02_devs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(s2mpu02_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
> + break;
This is a bit bonkers. Instead of passing S2MPU02, why don't you pass
a new container which holds s2mpu02_devs and s2mpu02_irq_chip, then
you won't need new mfd_add_devices() and regmap_add_irq_chip() calls
for every device you want to support.
[...]
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCHv5 1/3] mfd: sec-core: Add support for S2MPU02 device
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Add support for Samsung S2MPU02 PMIC device to the MFD sec-core driver.
The S2MPU02 device includes PMIC/RTC/Clock devices.
Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi cw00.c...@samsung.com
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski k.kozlow...@samsung.com
---
drivers/mfd/sec-core.c | 19 +
drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c| 88
include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h | 1 +
include/linux/mfd/samsung/irq.h | 24 +++
4 files changed, 132 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
index be06d0a..5e8784b 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
@@ -89,6 +89,17 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mpa01_devs[] = {
},
};
+static const struct mfd_cell s2mpu02_devs[] = {
+ {
+ .name = s2mpu02-pmic,
+ }, {
+ .name = s2mpu02-rtc,
Make these two one liners, so:
{ .name = s2mpu02-pmic },
{ .name = s2mpu02-rtc ),
+ }, {
+ .name = s2mpu02-clk,
+ .of_compatible = samsung,s2mpu02-clk,
+ }
+};
+
#ifdef CONFIG_OF
static const struct of_device_id sec_dt_match[] = {
{ .compatible = samsung,s5m8767-pmic,
@@ -103,6 +114,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id sec_dt_match[] = {
.compatible = samsung,s2mpa01-pmic,
.data = (void *)S2MPA01,
}, {
+ .compatible = samsung,s2mpu02-pmic,
+ .data = (void *)S2MPU02,
+ }, {
/* Sentinel */
},
};
@@ -342,6 +356,11 @@ static int sec_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
ret = mfd_add_devices(sec_pmic-dev, -1, s2mps14_devs,
ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps14_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
break;
+ case S2MPU02:
+ ret = mfd_add_devices(sec_pmic-dev, -1, s2mpu02_devs,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(s2mpu02_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
+ break;
This is a bit bonkers. Instead of passing S2MPU02, why don't you pass
a new container which holds s2mpu02_devs and s2mpu02_irq_chip, then
you won't need new mfd_add_devices() and regmap_add_irq_chip() calls
for every device you want to support.
[...]
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCHv5 1/3] mfd: sec-core: Add support for S2MPU02 device
Hi Lee,
On 06/16/2014 10:03 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Add support for Samsung S2MPU02 PMIC device to the MFD sec-core driver.
The S2MPU02 device includes PMIC/RTC/Clock devices.
Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi cw00.c...@samsung.com
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski k.kozlow...@samsung.com
---
drivers/mfd/sec-core.c | 19 +
drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c| 88
include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h | 1 +
include/linux/mfd/samsung/irq.h | 24 +++
4 files changed, 132 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
index be06d0a..5e8784b 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
@@ -89,6 +89,17 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mpa01_devs[] = {
},
};
+static const struct mfd_cell s2mpu02_devs[] = {
+{
+.name = s2mpu02-pmic,
+}, {
+.name = s2mpu02-rtc,
Make these two one liners, so:
{ .name = s2mpu02-pmic },
{ .name = s2mpu02-rtc ),
OK, I'll modify it.
+}, {
+.name = s2mpu02-clk,
+.of_compatible = samsung,s2mpu02-clk,
+}
+};
+
#ifdef CONFIG_OF
static const struct of_device_id sec_dt_match[] = {
{ .compatible = samsung,s5m8767-pmic,
@@ -103,6 +114,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id sec_dt_match[] = {
.compatible = samsung,s2mpa01-pmic,
.data = (void *)S2MPA01,
}, {
+.compatible = samsung,s2mpu02-pmic,
+.data = (void *)S2MPU02,
+}, {
/* Sentinel */
},
};
@@ -342,6 +356,11 @@ static int sec_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
ret = mfd_add_devices(sec_pmic-dev, -1, s2mps14_devs,
ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps14_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
break;
+case S2MPU02:
+ret = mfd_add_devices(sec_pmic-dev, -1, s2mpu02_devs,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(s2mpu02_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
+break;
This is a bit bonkers. Instead of passing S2MPU02, why don't you pass
a new container which holds s2mpu02_devs and s2mpu02_irq_chip, then
you won't need new mfd_add_devices() and regmap_add_irq_chip() calls
for every device you want to support.
OK, I'll remove duplicate code of mfd_add_devices() and regmap_add_irq_chip().
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[PATCHv5 1/3] mfd: sec-core: Add support for S2MPU02 device
Add support for Samsung S2MPU02 PMIC device to the MFD sec-core driver.
The S2MPU02 device includes PMIC/RTC/Clock devices.
Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
---
drivers/mfd/sec-core.c | 19 +
drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c| 88
include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h | 1 +
include/linux/mfd/samsung/irq.h | 24 +++
4 files changed, 132 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
index be06d0a..5e8784b 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
@@ -89,6 +89,17 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mpa01_devs[] = {
},
};
+static const struct mfd_cell s2mpu02_devs[] = {
+ {
+ .name = "s2mpu02-pmic",
+ }, {
+ .name = "s2mpu02-rtc",
+ }, {
+ .name = "s2mpu02-clk",
+ .of_compatible = "samsung,s2mpu02-clk",
+ }
+};
+
#ifdef CONFIG_OF
static const struct of_device_id sec_dt_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "samsung,s5m8767-pmic",
@@ -103,6 +114,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id sec_dt_match[] = {
.compatible = "samsung,s2mpa01-pmic",
.data = (void *)S2MPA01,
}, {
+ .compatible = "samsung,s2mpu02-pmic",
+ .data = (void *)S2MPU02,
+ }, {
/* Sentinel */
},
};
@@ -342,6 +356,11 @@ static int sec_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
ret = mfd_add_devices(sec_pmic->dev, -1, s2mps14_devs,
ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps14_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
break;
+ case S2MPU02:
+ ret = mfd_add_devices(sec_pmic->dev, -1, s2mpu02_devs,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(s2mpu02_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
+ break;
+
default:
/* If this happens the probe function is problem */
BUG();
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c
index 654e2c1..0cabd03 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
#include
#include
@@ -161,6 +162,77 @@ static const struct regmap_irq s2mps14_irqs[] = {
},
};
+static const struct regmap_irq s2mpu02_irqs[] = {
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_PWRONF] = {
+ .reg_offset = 0,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_PWRONF_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_PWRONR] = {
+ .reg_offset = 0,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_PWRONR_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_JIGONBF] = {
+ .reg_offset = 0,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_JIGONBF_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_JIGONBR] = {
+ .reg_offset = 0,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_JIGONBR_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_ACOKBF] = {
+ .reg_offset = 0,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_ACOKBF_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_ACOKBR] = {
+ .reg_offset = 0,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_ACOKBR_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_PWRON1S] = {
+ .reg_offset = 0,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_PWRON1S_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_MRB] = {
+ .reg_offset = 0,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_MRB_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_RTC60S] = {
+ .reg_offset = 1,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_RTC60S_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_RTCA1] = {
+ .reg_offset = 1,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_RTCA1_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_RTCA0] = {
+ .reg_offset = 1,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_RTCA0_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_SMPL] = {
+ .reg_offset = 1,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_SMPL_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_RTC1S] = {
+ .reg_offset = 1,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_RTC1S_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_WTSR] = {
+ .reg_offset = 1,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_WTSR_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_INT120C] = {
+ .reg_offset = 2,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_INT120C_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_INT140C] = {
+ .reg_offset = 2,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_INT140C_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_TSD] = {
+ .reg_offset = 2,
+ .mask = S2MPS14_IRQ_TSD_MASK,
+ },
+};
+
static const struct regmap_irq s5m8767_irqs[] = {
[S5M8767_IRQ_PWRR] = {
.reg_offset = 0,
@@ -327,6 +399,16 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip s2mps14_irq_chip = {
.ack_base = S2MPS14_REG_INT1,
};
+static const struct regmap_irq_chip s2mpu02_irq_chip = {
+ .name = "s2mpu02",
+ .irqs = s2mpu02_irqs,
+ .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(s2mpu02_irqs),
+ .num_regs = 3,
+ .status_base = S2MPU02_REG_INT1,
+ .mask_base = S2MPU02_REG_INT1M,
+ .ack_base =
[PATCHv5 1/3] mfd: sec-core: Add support for S2MPU02 device
Add support for Samsung S2MPU02 PMIC device to the MFD sec-core driver.
The S2MPU02 device includes PMIC/RTC/Clock devices.
Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi cw00.c...@samsung.com
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski k.kozlow...@samsung.com
---
drivers/mfd/sec-core.c | 19 +
drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c| 88
include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h | 1 +
include/linux/mfd/samsung/irq.h | 24 +++
4 files changed, 132 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
index be06d0a..5e8784b 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
@@ -89,6 +89,17 @@ static const struct mfd_cell s2mpa01_devs[] = {
},
};
+static const struct mfd_cell s2mpu02_devs[] = {
+ {
+ .name = s2mpu02-pmic,
+ }, {
+ .name = s2mpu02-rtc,
+ }, {
+ .name = s2mpu02-clk,
+ .of_compatible = samsung,s2mpu02-clk,
+ }
+};
+
#ifdef CONFIG_OF
static const struct of_device_id sec_dt_match[] = {
{ .compatible = samsung,s5m8767-pmic,
@@ -103,6 +114,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id sec_dt_match[] = {
.compatible = samsung,s2mpa01-pmic,
.data = (void *)S2MPA01,
}, {
+ .compatible = samsung,s2mpu02-pmic,
+ .data = (void *)S2MPU02,
+ }, {
/* Sentinel */
},
};
@@ -342,6 +356,11 @@ static int sec_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
ret = mfd_add_devices(sec_pmic-dev, -1, s2mps14_devs,
ARRAY_SIZE(s2mps14_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
break;
+ case S2MPU02:
+ ret = mfd_add_devices(sec_pmic-dev, -1, s2mpu02_devs,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(s2mpu02_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
+ break;
+
default:
/* If this happens the probe function is problem */
BUG();
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c
index 654e2c1..0cabd03 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include linux/mfd/samsung/irq.h
#include linux/mfd/samsung/s2mps11.h
#include linux/mfd/samsung/s2mps14.h
+#include linux/mfd/samsung/s2mpu02.h
#include linux/mfd/samsung/s5m8763.h
#include linux/mfd/samsung/s5m8767.h
@@ -161,6 +162,77 @@ static const struct regmap_irq s2mps14_irqs[] = {
},
};
+static const struct regmap_irq s2mpu02_irqs[] = {
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_PWRONF] = {
+ .reg_offset = 0,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_PWRONF_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_PWRONR] = {
+ .reg_offset = 0,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_PWRONR_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_JIGONBF] = {
+ .reg_offset = 0,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_JIGONBF_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_JIGONBR] = {
+ .reg_offset = 0,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_JIGONBR_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_ACOKBF] = {
+ .reg_offset = 0,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_ACOKBF_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_ACOKBR] = {
+ .reg_offset = 0,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_ACOKBR_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_PWRON1S] = {
+ .reg_offset = 0,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_PWRON1S_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_MRB] = {
+ .reg_offset = 0,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_MRB_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_RTC60S] = {
+ .reg_offset = 1,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_RTC60S_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_RTCA1] = {
+ .reg_offset = 1,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_RTCA1_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_RTCA0] = {
+ .reg_offset = 1,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_RTCA0_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_SMPL] = {
+ .reg_offset = 1,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_SMPL_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_RTC1S] = {
+ .reg_offset = 1,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_RTC1S_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_WTSR] = {
+ .reg_offset = 1,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_WTSR_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_INT120C] = {
+ .reg_offset = 2,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_INT120C_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_INT140C] = {
+ .reg_offset = 2,
+ .mask = S2MPS11_IRQ_INT140C_MASK,
+ },
+ [S2MPU02_IRQ_TSD] = {
+ .reg_offset = 2,
+ .mask = S2MPS14_IRQ_TSD_MASK,
+ },
+};
+
static const struct regmap_irq s5m8767_irqs[] = {
[S5M8767_IRQ_PWRR] = {
.reg_offset = 0,
@@ -327,6 +399,16 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip s2mps14_irq_chip = {
.ack_base = S2MPS14_REG_INT1,
};
+static const struct regmap_irq_chip s2mpu02_irq_chip = {
+ .name = s2mpu02,
+ .irqs =
