Re: [RESEND][PATCH] pinctrl: exynos: remove duplicate calls in irq handler

2016-08-16 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On 08/16/2016 08:49 AM, perr perr wrote:
> Because chained_irq_enter() has already called chip->irq_mask() and 
> chip->irq_ack(), also chained_irq_exit() will call chip->irq_unmask(), 
> so it's not necessary to call chip->irq_*() here. 
>  
> Signed-off-by: Perr Zhang 
>  
> --- 
>  drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 6 +- 
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) 

Hi,

Thanks for fixing Signed-off-by but now the commiter name does not match
Signed-off-by. In the same time you skipped the tags you got already
(Tomasz's ack and my reviewed-by).

BR,
Krzysztof

>  
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
> b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
> index 051b5bf..d32fa2b 100644 
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
> @@ -428,14 +428,10 @@ static void exynos_irq_eint0_15(struct irq_desc *desc) 
>  int eint_irq; 
>   
>  chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); 
> -chip->irq_mask(>irq_data); 
> - 
> -if (chip->irq_ack) 
> -chip->irq_ack(>irq_data); 
>   
>  eint_irq = irq_linear_revmap(bank->irq_domain, eintd->irq); 
>  generic_handle_irq(eint_irq); 
> -chip->irq_unmask(>irq_data); 
> + 
>  chained_irq_exit(chip, desc); 
>  } 
>   
> --  
> 1.9.3 
>  
> 
> 
> 



Re: [RESEND][PATCH] pinctrl: exynos: remove duplicate calls in irq handler

2016-08-16 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On 08/16/2016 08:49 AM, perr perr wrote:
> Because chained_irq_enter() has already called chip->irq_mask() and 
> chip->irq_ack(), also chained_irq_exit() will call chip->irq_unmask(), 
> so it's not necessary to call chip->irq_*() here. 
>  
> Signed-off-by: Perr Zhang 
>  
> --- 
>  drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 6 +- 
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) 

Hi,

Thanks for fixing Signed-off-by but now the commiter name does not match
Signed-off-by. In the same time you skipped the tags you got already
(Tomasz's ack and my reviewed-by).

BR,
Krzysztof

>  
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
> b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
> index 051b5bf..d32fa2b 100644 
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
> @@ -428,14 +428,10 @@ static void exynos_irq_eint0_15(struct irq_desc *desc) 
>  int eint_irq; 
>   
>  chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); 
> -chip->irq_mask(>irq_data); 
> - 
> -if (chip->irq_ack) 
> -chip->irq_ack(>irq_data); 
>   
>  eint_irq = irq_linear_revmap(bank->irq_domain, eintd->irq); 
>  generic_handle_irq(eint_irq); 
> -chip->irq_unmask(>irq_data); 
> + 
>  chained_irq_exit(chip, desc); 
>  } 
>   
> --  
> 1.9.3 
>  
> 
> 
> 



[RESEND][PATCH] pinctrl: exynos: remove duplicate calls in irq handler

2016-08-16 Thread perr perr
Because chained_irq_enter() has already called chip->irq_mask() and 
chip->irq_ack(), also chained_irq_exit() will call chip->irq_unmask(), 
so it's not necessary to call chip->irq_*() here. 
 
Signed-off-by: Perr Zhang 
 
--- 
 drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 6 +- 
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) 
 
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
index 051b5bf..d32fa2b 100644 
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
@@ -428,14 +428,10 @@ static void exynos_irq_eint0_15(struct irq_desc *desc) 
 int eint_irq; 
  
 chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); 
-chip->irq_mask(>irq_data); 
- 
-if (chip->irq_ack) 
-chip->irq_ack(>irq_data); 
  
 eint_irq = irq_linear_revmap(bank->irq_domain, eintd->irq); 
 generic_handle_irq(eint_irq); 
-chip->irq_unmask(>irq_data); 
+ 
 chained_irq_exit(chip, desc); 
 } 
  
--  
1.9.3 
 



[RESEND][PATCH] pinctrl: exynos: remove duplicate calls in irq handler

2016-08-16 Thread perr perr
Because chained_irq_enter() has already called chip->irq_mask() and 
chip->irq_ack(), also chained_irq_exit() will call chip->irq_unmask(), 
so it's not necessary to call chip->irq_*() here. 
 
Signed-off-by: Perr Zhang 
 
--- 
 drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 6 +- 
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) 
 
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
index 051b5bf..d32fa2b 100644 
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
@@ -428,14 +428,10 @@ static void exynos_irq_eint0_15(struct irq_desc *desc) 
 int eint_irq; 
  
 chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); 
-chip->irq_mask(>irq_data); 
- 
-if (chip->irq_ack) 
-chip->irq_ack(>irq_data); 
  
 eint_irq = irq_linear_revmap(bank->irq_domain, eintd->irq); 
 generic_handle_irq(eint_irq); 
-chip->irq_unmask(>irq_data); 
+ 
 chained_irq_exit(chip, desc); 
 } 
  
--  
1.9.3 
 



[Resend][PATCH] pinctrl: exynos: remove duplicate calls in irq handler

2016-08-15 Thread perr perr
Because chained_irq_enter() has already called chip->irq_mask() and 
chip->irq_ack(), also chained_irq_exit() will call chip->irq_unmask(), 
so it's not necessary to call chip->irq_*() here. 
 
Signed-off-by: Perr Zhang 
 
--- 
 drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 6 +- 
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) 
 
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
index 051b5bf..d32fa2b 100644 
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
@@ -428,14 +428,10 @@ static void exynos_irq_eint0_15(struct irq_desc *desc) 
 int eint_irq; 
  
 chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); 
-chip->irq_mask(>irq_data); 
- 
-if (chip->irq_ack) 
-chip->irq_ack(>irq_data); 
  
 eint_irq = irq_linear_revmap(bank->irq_domain, eintd->irq); 
 generic_handle_irq(eint_irq); 
-chip->irq_unmask(>irq_data); 
+ 
 chained_irq_exit(chip, desc); 
 } 
  
--  
1.9.3 
 



[Resend][PATCH] pinctrl: exynos: remove duplicate calls in irq handler

2016-08-15 Thread perr perr
Because chained_irq_enter() has already called chip->irq_mask() and 
chip->irq_ack(), also chained_irq_exit() will call chip->irq_unmask(), 
so it's not necessary to call chip->irq_*() here. 
 
Signed-off-by: Perr Zhang 
 
--- 
 drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 6 +- 
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) 
 
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
index 051b5bf..d32fa2b 100644 
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c 
@@ -428,14 +428,10 @@ static void exynos_irq_eint0_15(struct irq_desc *desc) 
 int eint_irq; 
  
 chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); 
-chip->irq_mask(>irq_data); 
- 
-if (chip->irq_ack) 
-chip->irq_ack(>irq_data); 
  
 eint_irq = irq_linear_revmap(bank->irq_domain, eintd->irq); 
 generic_handle_irq(eint_irq); 
-chip->irq_unmask(>irq_data); 
+ 
 chained_irq_exit(chip, desc); 
 } 
  
--  
1.9.3