Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/2] ASoC: simple-card: Add documentation for force-dpcm property
Hi > > > > DPCM is an implementation detail of Linux (and one that we want to phase > > > > out going forwards too), we shouldn't be putting it in the DT bindings > > > > where it becomes an ABI. > > > > > I see your point. This is way I marked the patch series as RFC. I need to > > > find > > > another way to reuse simple-card as machine driver for SOF. > > > > Have a look at the way the Renesas systems are using this and the audio > > graph card - they have DPCM. > > Indeed we (= Renesas) are using this as DPCM, but unfortunately > it is not upstreamed. Using local patch. I mean DT part. Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto
Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/2] ASoC: simple-card: Add documentation for force-dpcm property
Hi > > > DPCM is an implementation detail of Linux (and one that we want to phase > > > out going forwards too), we shouldn't be putting it in the DT bindings > > > where it becomes an ABI. > > > I see your point. This is way I marked the patch series as RFC. I need to > > find > > another way to reuse simple-card as machine driver for SOF. > > Have a look at the way the Renesas systems are using this and the audio > graph card - they have DPCM. Indeed we (= Renesas) are using this as DPCM, but unfortunately it is not upstreamed. Using local patch. Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto
Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/2] ASoC: simple-card: Add documentation for force-dpcm property
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 04:17:31PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 2:57 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > DPCM is an implementation detail of Linux (and one that we want to phase > > out going forwards too), we shouldn't be putting it in the DT bindings > > where it becomes an ABI. > I see your point. This is way I marked the patch series as RFC. I need to find > another way to reuse simple-card as machine driver for SOF. Have a look at the way the Renesas systems are using this and the audio graph card - they have DPCM. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/2] ASoC: simple-card: Add documentation for force-dpcm property
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 2:57 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 10:00:14PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote: > > > This property can be global in which case all links created will be DPCM > > or present in certian dai-link subnode in which case only that specific > > link is forced to be DPCM. > > > +- force-dpcm : Indicates dai-link is always DPCM. > > DPCM is an implementation detail of Linux (and one that we want to phase > out going forwards too), we shouldn't be putting it in the DT bindings > where it becomes an ABI. Hi Mark, I see your point. This is way I marked the patch series as RFC. I need to find another way to reuse simple-card as machine driver for SOF. thanks, Daniel.
