> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Li [mailto:philip...@intel.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 6, 2020 3:47 PM
> To: Dan Carpenter
> Cc: Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) ;
> kbu...@lists.01.org; h...@lst.de; m.szyprow...@samsung.com;
> robin.mur...@arm.com; catalin.mari...@arm.com; l...@intel.com; Dan
> Carpenter ; kbuild-...@lists.01.org;
> io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Linuxarm ; Jonathan
> Cameron ; John Garry
>
> Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH 1/3] dma-direct: provide the ability to
> reserve per-numa CMA
>
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 11:57:51AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:04:31AM +, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpen...@oracle.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 11:37 PM
> > > > To: kbu...@lists.01.org; Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
> > > > ; h...@lst.de;
> > > > m.szyprow...@samsung.com; robin.mur...@arm.com;
> > > > catalin.mari...@arm.com
> > > > Cc: l...@intel.com; Dan Carpenter ;
> > > > kbuild-...@lists.01.org; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org;
> > > > linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> > > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Linuxarm ;
> > > > Jonathan Cameron ; John Garry
> > > >
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dma-direct: provide the ability to
> > > > reserve per-numa CMA
> > > >
> > > > Hi Barry,
> > > >
> > > > url:
> > > > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Barry-Song/support-per-nu
> > > > ma-CM
> > > > A-for-ARM-server/20200603-104821
> > > > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
> > > > for-next/core
> > > > config: x86_64-randconfig-m001-20200603 (attached as .config)
> > > > compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-13) 9.3.0
> > > >
> > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot
> > > > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter
> > >
> > > Dan, thanks! Good catch!
> > > as this patch has not been in mainline yet, is it correct to add these
> "reported-by" in patch v2?
> Hi Barry, we provides the suggestion here, but you may decide to add or not as
> appropriate for your situation. For the patch still under development, it is
> not
> that necessary to add i think.
Hi Philip, Dan,
Thanks for clarification.
>
> >
> > These are just an automated email from the zero day bot. I look over
> > the Smatch warnings and then forward them on.
> >
> > regards,
> > dan carpenter
Best regards
Barry
